Apache Subversion vs Bitbucket Server comparison

Apache and Atlassian are both solutions in the Version Control category. Apache is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.5, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Apache holds a 2.2% mindshare in VC, compared to Atlassian’s 22.3% mindshare. Additionally, 42% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Apache Subversion

Read 5 Apache Subversion reviews

232 Views
232 Comparison Views

42% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Read 26 Bitbucket Server reviews

2,774 Views
2,774 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Apache Subversion are competitors in the version control category. Bitbucket Server has the upper hand due to its modern features and integrations.

Features: Bitbucket Server includes integration with other Atlassian products, pull requests, branch permissions, and seamless Git support. Apache Subversion offers centralized version control, consistent version management, and robustness.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server needs improved performance, better support for large repositories, and faster load times. Apache Subversion requires better merging capabilities, a more intuitive user experience, and an updated interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server is easy to deploy, especially with existing Atlassian tools, and has responsive customer service. Apache Subversion has a steep learning curve but provides detailed documentation; its customer support could be more accessible.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server's setup cost is justified by features and integrations, offering good ROI. Apache Subversion's lower setup costs attract budget-conscious users, though Bitbucket Server's features lead to higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 2.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 22.3%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."

"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."

"Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration."

"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."

"It is an easily scalable solution."

"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."

More Bitbucket Server pros

Cons

"The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."

"The most valuable feature is CLI."

"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."

"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."

"The product's initial setup phase is complex."

"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."

"The product interface consists of multiple features that are complicated to navigate for new users."

"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."

"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

More Bitbucket Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"We pay around $6 per user."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Subversion?

We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

See all answers

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub vs Apache Subversion

Compared 43% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Compared 34% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 23% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 86% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 7% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

August 2025

Download Apache Subversion product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server

August 2025

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Stash

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server

July 2025

Free Report: Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.