Apache Subversion vs Bitbucket Server comparison

Apache and Atlassian are both solutions in the Version Control category. Apache is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.0, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7. Apache holds a 4.2% mindshare in VC, compared to Atlassian’s 14.3% mindshare. Additionally, 42% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Apache Subversion

Read 5 Apache Subversion reviews

325 Views
325 Comparison Views

42% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Read 27 Bitbucket Server reviews

1,997 Views
1,997 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Apache Subversion are competitors in the version control category. Bitbucket Server has the upper hand due to its modern features and integrations.

Features: Bitbucket Server includes integration with other Atlassian products, pull requests, branch permissions, and seamless Git support. Apache Subversion offers centralized version control, consistent version management, and robustness.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server needs improved performance, better support for large repositories, and faster load times. Apache Subversion requires better merging capabilities, a more intuitive user experience, and an updated interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server is easy to deploy, especially with existing Atlassian tools, and has responsive customer service. Apache Subversion has a steep learning curve but provides detailed documentation; its customer support could be more accessible.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server's setup cost is justified by features and integrations, offering good ROI. Apache Subversion's lower setup costs attract budget-conscious users, though Bitbucket Server's features lead to higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.0

Apache Subversion offers a cost-free solution for small teams but lacks ROI compared to Bitbucket's CI/CD integrations.

Sentiment score

1.0

Bitbucket Server offers cost savings, improved collaboration, and reduced maintenance, surpassing Perforce or GitLab alternatives in efficiency and value.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.8

Apache Subversion users often rely on community support and online resources, rating direct support between 5 to 8 out of 10.

Sentiment score

5.5

Bitbucket Server's support receives mixed reviews, with inconsistencies reported, but overall satisfaction and desire for improved responsiveness.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

Finding the right solution becomes difficult because there are so many things that create confusion.

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

If they encounter problems beyond their scope, they contact the vendor directly.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.5

Apache Subversion is scalable, supporting multiple instances and accommodating 10-20 users per instance, and is well-rated for scalability.

Sentiment score

8.0

Bitbucket Server is highly rated for scalability, supporting various project sizes and accommodating growth with minor adjustments.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

Bitbucket Server is quite scalable because it is a server-side solution, and we can scale it vertically easily.

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Bitbucket Server has been working efficiently for us so far, and I would rate it an eight or nine for scalability.

Dan Berg

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

4.5

Feedback on Apache Subversion's stability is mixed, with ratings ranging from six to eight out of ten.

Sentiment score

5.3

Bitbucket Server is highly stable, often rated 9-10/10, with minor issues mostly related to indexing and linked system downtimes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Room For Improvement

Apache Subversion users seek improved merging, ease of use, and features like CI/CD integration and customized configurations akin to GitHub.

Bitbucket Server requires better scaling, modernization, integration, user support, and enhanced features for competitiveness and improved user experience.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

Bitbucket Server should provide more flexible configuration for granular permissions.

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Collaboration could be improved as the main aspect.

Dan Berg

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Setup Cost

Apache Subversion is valued by enterprises for being open-source, cost-effective, and providing quality without licensing fees.

Bitbucket Server pricing varies by user count, affecting costs, with on-premises options considered expensive, yet competitive.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

It's probably slightly expensive, and the cost depends on what you compare it with.

Dan Berg

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Bitbucket Server license is affordable.

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Valuable Features

Apache Subversion provides centralized version control, easy collaboration, and integration capabilities, enhancing code management and team productivity.

Bitbucket Server offers integration, a user-friendly interface, efficient code management, scalability, and flexible pricing, ideal for developers.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort.

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

The pull request feature in Bitbucket Server is necessary.

Dan Berg

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 4.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 14.3%, down from 28.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	14.3%
Apache Subversion	4.2%
Other	81.5%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Integrated code tracking has streamlined our development workflows and supports project visibility

The biggest benefit I see from Bitbucket Server is that it is providing all the features which Git is providing. Bitbucket Server is using Git as a source code main tool, and it has all the features that any source code repository can provide. A plus point is that we can install it on-premises and manage it easily. Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort. Without Bitbucket Server, it is very difficult to track the code and changes. The integration with Jira helps me personally with project tracking because Bitbucket Server is a source code repository. We have our SDLC lifecycle in Jira. Every change or every feature request is created as a ticket in Jira, and this ticket is linked with Bitbucket Server repository. Any changes to the code linked to that feature will go to the repository, and we can track that this is the code changed by this feature.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?

The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to appr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

We use Bitbucket Server for storing code. It is a way to manage configuration items, keep track of code, commits, and pull requests.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub vs Apache Subversion

Compared 29% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Compared 27% of the time

Git vs Apache Subversion

Compared 26% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 18% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 66% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 7% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 5% of the time

Surround SCM vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

January 2026

Download Apache Subversion product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server

January 2026

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Stash

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server

December 2025

Free Report: Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.