Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Subversion vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.0
Apache Subversion offers a cost-free solution for small teams but lacks ROI compared to Bitbucket's CI/CD integrations.
Sentiment score
1.0
Bitbucket Server offers cost savings, improved collaboration, and reduced maintenance, surpassing Perforce or GitLab alternatives in efficiency and value.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Apache Subversion users often rely on community support and online resources, rating direct support between 5 to 8 out of 10.
Sentiment score
4.4
Bitbucket Server's support receives mixed reviews, with inconsistencies reported, but overall satisfaction and desire for improved responsiveness.
If they encounter problems beyond their scope, they contact the vendor directly.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Apache Subversion is scalable, supporting multiple instances and accommodating 10-20 users per instance, and is well-rated for scalability.
Sentiment score
8.5
Bitbucket Server is highly rated for scalability, supporting various project sizes and accommodating growth with minor adjustments.
Bitbucket Server has been working efficiently for us so far, and I would rate it an eight or nine for scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
4.5
Feedback on Apache Subversion's stability is mixed, with ratings ranging from six to eight out of ten.
Sentiment score
1.0
Bitbucket Server is highly stable, often rated 9-10/10, with minor issues mostly related to indexing and linked system downtimes.
 

Room For Improvement

Apache Subversion users seek improved merging, ease of use, and features like CI/CD integration and customized configurations akin to GitHub.
Bitbucket Server requires better scaling, modernization, integration, user support, and enhanced features for competitiveness and improved user experience.
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it.
Collaboration could be improved as the main aspect.
 

Setup Cost

Apache Subversion is valued by enterprises for being open-source, cost-effective, and providing quality without licensing fees.
Bitbucket Server pricing varies by user count, affecting costs, with on-premises options considered expensive, yet competitive.
It's probably slightly expensive, and the cost depends on what you compare it with.
 

Valuable Features

Apache Subversion provides centralized version control, easy collaboration, and integration capabilities, enhancing code management and team productivity.
Bitbucket Server offers integration, a user-friendly interface, efficient code management, scalability, and flexible pricing, ideal for developers.
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration.
The pull request feature in Bitbucket Server is necessary.
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion
Ranking in Version Control
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 2.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 19.1%, down from 27.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Bitbucket Server19.1%
Apache Subversion2.9%
Other78.0%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Subversion?
We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?
I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.
What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I w...
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to appr...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
We use Bitbucket Server for storing code. It is a way to manage configuration items, keep track of code, commits, and pull requests.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.