We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product."
"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its capabilities."
"The initial deployment is rather straightforward and only takes 30 minutes to an hour."
"The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"The solution is not user-friendly. Right now, the solution is not so easy to understand. It needs to update its design and overall user experience."
"One of the areas the solution could improve on is when there is a merging conflict it is quite confusing. When I am having a merging conflict I get stuck on the page, then I need to search how to handle the particular problem. For example, finding what the commands are which can be used."
"I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap."
"There are many places where the product could be expanded to make it a more complete solution."
"There is room for improvement in the workflow. Other similar tools offer automation and more streamlined workflows, which Bitbucket currently lacks."
"Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Git and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.