Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Subversion vs Git comparison

Apache and Git are both solutions in the Version Control category. Apache is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.0, while Git is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.7. Apache holds a 4.2% mindshare in VC, compared to Git’s 11.4% mindshare. Additionally, 42% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Git users who would recommend it.
Apache Subversion
Read 5 Apache Subversion reviews
  • 414 Views
  • 414 Comparison Views
42% willing to recommend
Git
Read 38 Git reviews
  • 1,462 Views
  • 1,462 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Apache Subversion and Git compete in the version control systems category. Git seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and powerful features, despite appreciation for Apache Subversion's stability and simplicity.

Features: Apache Subversion offers atomic commits, directory versioning, and efficient handling of binary files. Git provides a distributed system, branching capabilities, and speed which gives it a notable advantage for advanced control needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion needs better handling of merging conflicts and more modern integrations. Git users find its command set complex and face occasional performance issues in very large repositories.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Subversion is straightforward to deploy with dependable customer support. Git deployment is well-regarded but more complex to configure. Git's customer service is effective but varies by provider.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion involves lower setup costs, providing strong ROI through reliability. Git may have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI due to its advanced features and performance gains.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Git Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Apache Subversion vs. Git
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion
Ranking in Version Control
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Git
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 4.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 11.4%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Git11.4%
Apache Subversion4.2%
Other84.4%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Vijay Londhe
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.
Read full review
Vijaya Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Vijaya Das
Director - Technical Product Management at Visa
A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments
Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"I find the strong point of Apache Subversion to be that it is a centralized version control system, allowing us to keep our code repositories at a central server."
"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."
"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."
"I use the solution for website management."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."
"The product protects our data."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."
"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
More Git pros
 

Cons

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."
"The product needs to improve its UI."
"The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."
"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."
More Git cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."
"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."
"The tool is free."
"The tool is an open-source product."
"Git is completely free."
"Git is an open-source software."
"The platform is less expensive."
"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."
More Git pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
19%
Marketing Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?
I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?
There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I w...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?
The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?
Git is an open-source software.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Git?
There is nothing that could be improved at this time.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Git?
I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion
Compared 24% of the time
GitHub vs Apache Subversion Logo
GitHub vs Apache Subversion
Compared 23% of the time
Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion Logo
Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion
Compared 19% of the time
More Apache Subversion Competitors
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git Logo
IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git
Compared 15% of the time
Helix Core vs Git Logo
Helix Core vs Git
Compared 13% of the time
Surround SCM vs Git Logo
Surround SCM vs Git
Compared 11% of the time
Canonical Bazaar vs Git Logo
Canonical Bazaar vs Git
Compared 10% of the time
Liquibase vs Git Logo
Liquibase vs Git
Compared 8% of the time
More Git Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Version Control
March 2026
Apache Subversion reportDownload Apache Subversion product report
Buyer's Guide
Git
March 2026
Git reportDownload Git product report
 

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)
Apache
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.
Git
 

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse
Buyer's Guide
Apache Subversion vs. Git
March 2026
Free Report: Apache Subversion vs. Git
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Subversion vs. Git and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Apache Subversion vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.