Apache Subversion vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,073 Views
1,073 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Apache Subversion and Git compete in the version control systems category. Git seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and powerful features, despite appreciation for Apache Subversion's stability and simplicity.

Features: Apache Subversion offers atomic commits, directory versioning, and efficient handling of binary files. Git provides a distributed system, branching capabilities, and speed which gives it a notable advantage for advanced control needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion needs better handling of merging conflicts and more modern integrations. Git users find its command set complex and face occasional performance issues in very large repositories.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Subversion is straightforward to deploy with dependable customer support. Git deployment is well-regarded but more complex to configure. Git's customer service is effective but varies by provider.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion involves lower setup costs, providing strong ROI through reliability. Git may have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI due to its advanced features and performance gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Git Report (Updated: July 2025).

Apache Subversion vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 2.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 9.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Hari Kathireshan

Sr PHP Developer at GE

An easy-to-use solution that can be used for configuration management

We use Git for configuration management Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working. Git's user interface could be improved. I have been using Git for almost eight years. Git is a stable solution. Git is a scalable solution. Around 2,000 users use the solution in our…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Git is easy to use."

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

More Git pros

Cons

"The most valuable feature is CLI."

"The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."

"I would like more documentation."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."

"Git is completely free."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is an open-source software."

"We use the open-source version."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Subversion?

We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

GitHub vs Apache Subversion

Comparisons

Compared 43% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Compared 35% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 22% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 40% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Version Control

Download Apache Subversion product report

Download Git product report

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Apache Subversion vs. Git