Apache Subversion vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

2,632 Views
2,632 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Apache Subversion and Git compete in the version control systems category. Git seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and powerful features, despite appreciation for Apache Subversion's stability and simplicity.

Features: Apache Subversion offers atomic commits, directory versioning, and efficient handling of binary files. Git provides a distributed system, branching capabilities, and speed which gives it a notable advantage for advanced control needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion needs better handling of merging conflicts and more modern integrations. Git users find its command set complex and face occasional performance issues in very large repositories.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Subversion is straightforward to deploy with dependable customer support. Git deployment is well-regarded but more complex to configure. Git's customer service is effective but varies by provider.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion involves lower setup costs, providing strong ROI through reliability. Git may have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI due to its advanced features and performance gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Git Report (Updated: April 2026).

Apache Subversion vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 4.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 12.6%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Git	12.6%
Apache Subversion	4.2%
Other	83.2%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Dimitris Iracleous

Lead Technical Instructor at Code.Hub

A powerful and mature solution that helps to collaborate and eliminate issues with code

Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

"The ease of installation, configuration, and user friendliness."

"As an open source solution it's very effective, will be very useful for individual and for small teams."

"I find the strong point of Apache Subversion to be that it is a centralized version control system, allowing us to keep our code repositories at a central server."

"The implementation is easy."

"All of the features in Git are useful."

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

"My advice to others is Git is the industry standard for source code versioning and my recommendation for them is to learn it and use it."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

More Git pros

Cons

"It's easy, cost effective but not a enterprise tool therefore the community has to work with that direction."

"Its handling of complex merging needs work."

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."

"The most valuable feature is CLI."

"The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes and so forth."

"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"It's not very user-friendly."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"The tool is free."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"Git is completely free."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"The platform is less expensive."

"We use the open-source version."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?

The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

What is your primary use case for Git?

I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.

GitHub vs Apache Subversion

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Compared 15% of the time

Helix Core vs Apache Subversion

Compared 10% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Apache Subversion

Compared 7% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 13% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 13% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Version Control

Download Apache Subversion product report

Download Git product report

Overview

Apache Subversion is a version control system that helps manage file versions and collaborate effectively. It is widely used to store historical changes and track project versions efficiently.

Apache Subversion offers robust support for version tracking and collaborative development across teams. Known for its reliability, it allows managing multiple file and directory versions. Its powerful merging and branching capabilities enable teams to handle concurrent development streams with ease, ensuring integrity and consistency in project workflows.

What are the core features of Apache Subversion?

Version Tracking: Keeps a history of all changes and supports version rollbacks.
Branching and Merging: Facilitates working on different project paths without conflict.
Directory Versioning: Manages directory changes alongside file updates.
Atomic Commits: Ensures complete changeset commits, minimizing errors.

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews for Apache Subversion?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces overhead with open-source accessibility.
Collaborative Workflow: Enhances team productivity through shared repositories.
Data Integrity: Maintains project data accuracy and reliability.

Apache Subversion is integral in sectors like IT and development, where version control and collaboration are crucial. It supports development cycles in companies that require stringent version management, ensuring seamless project transitions from initial stages to deployment.

Apache

Git offers branch management, version control, and automation to facilitate quick deployments and team collaboration. Supporting CLI and GUI, it integrates seamlessly with platforms like GitHub, providing a stable environment for code management and deployment.

Git's branch management, version control, and seamless integration with other platforms like GitHub make it a fundamental tool for software development. Its capabilities allow multiple users to work simultaneously, making it ideal for collaborative environments. Git is easy to learn and supports both command-line and graphical interfaces, providing flexibility in usage. It maintains a detailed log of modifications, assisting in efficient code tracking and troubleshooting. While its pricing model and merging capabilities could see improvements, as well as UI enhancements, Git still stands out for its reliability and performance.

What are Git's most valuable features?

Branch Management: Facilitates organized work on different features concurrently.
Version Control: Easily track changes and revert to previous versions.
Integration: Compatible with GitHub for enhanced collaboration.
CLI & GUI Support: Offers versatility in user preferences.
Comprehensive Log: Aids in detailed code tracking and issue resolution.

What benefits can users expect from Git?

Stability: Provides a reliable platform for development.
Performance: Efficiently handles multiple users and large projects.
Ecosystem: Extensive resources and community support.
Easy Learning Curve: User-friendly for new developers.

Git is employed extensively in software development for version control and collaborative coding. It's integral in web design and configuration management where maintaining multiple code versions offline is crucial. Organizations leverage Git for project and application development, benefiting IT departments and research activities with its robust repository management capabilities. Both cloud and on-premise deployments enhance productivity across industries.

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Apache Subversion vs. Git