We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."
"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."
"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."
"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."
"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."
"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."
"Synchronization could be better. Sometimes when you create a branch and merge it into another branch, I think it's a bit complex for no reason. The initial setup is also tricky when you do it for the first time."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."
"The solution works perfectly fine so far."
"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM and Helix Core. See our Apache Subversion vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.