Apache Subversion vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,462 Views
1,462 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Apache Subversion and Git compete in the version control systems category. Git seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and powerful features, despite appreciation for Apache Subversion's stability and simplicity.

Features: Apache Subversion offers atomic commits, directory versioning, and efficient handling of binary files. Git provides a distributed system, branching capabilities, and speed which gives it a notable advantage for advanced control needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion needs better handling of merging conflicts and more modern integrations. Git users find its command set complex and face occasional performance issues in very large repositories.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Subversion is straightforward to deploy with dependable customer support. Git deployment is well-regarded but more complex to configure. Git's customer service is effective but varies by provider.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion involves lower setup costs, providing strong ROI through reliability. Git may have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI due to its advanced features and performance gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. Git Report (Updated: March 2026).

Apache Subversion vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 4.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 11.4%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Git	11.4%
Apache Subversion	4.2%
Other	84.4%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Vijaya Das

Director - Technical Product Management at Visa

A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments

Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."

"I find the strong point of Apache Subversion to be that it is a centralized version control system, allowing us to keep our code repositories at a central server."

"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

More Git pros

Cons

"The most valuable feature is CLI."

"The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer."

"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."

"The solution works perfectly fine so far."

"The product needs to improve its UI."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."

"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is good."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"We use the open-source version."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Git is an open-source software."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

19%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?

The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

What is your primary use case for Git?

I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub vs Apache Subversion

Compared 23% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 19% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 13% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Liquibase vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Version Control

Download Apache Subversion product report

Download Git product report

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Apache Subversion vs. Git