Apache Subversion vs GitHub comparison

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
1,207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Apache Subversion and GitHub are both prominent version control systems, with GitHub being superior due to its diverse collaboration features, distributed model, and integrations that simplify development workflows.

Features: Apache Subversion offers centralized version control, making it straightforward, with strong binary file management and improved stability. GitHub has a distributed version control system and supports features like advanced collaboration, code review tools, and a rich set of integrations, making it ideal for modern development needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion could benefit from improved user interface, better community engagement, and enhanced workflow integrations. GitHub needs to address its pricing complexities, improve support for large binary files, and strengthen offline capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Apache Subversion can be simpler for on-premise setups requiring dedicated infrastructure. It primarily relies on community support. GitHub offers streamlined cloud-based deployment with comprehensive support options and numerous resources, making it easier for teams seeking minimal maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion generally has low initial costs being open-source, but server maintenance can add expenses. GitHub uses a subscription model reflecting continuous innovation, with projects like GitHub Free and GitHub Pro starting at no cost and $4/month respectively, popular for reducing collaboration overhead and enhancing development speed, offering a favorable ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2025).

Apache Subversion vs. GitHub

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,511 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.0

Apache Subversion offers a cost-free solution for small teams but lacks ROI compared to Bitbucket's CI/CD integrations.

Sentiment score

3.3

GitHub improves efficiency and cost savings with enhanced code management, secure storage, and streamlined version control for faster releases.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.8

Apache Subversion users often rely on community support and online resources, rating direct support between 5 to 8 out of 10.

Sentiment score

4.7

GitHub's customer service is generally efficient, with community forums often preferred due to quick, effective solutions.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.5

Apache Subversion is scalable, supporting multiple instances and accommodating 10-20 users per instance, and is well-rated for scalability.

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub excels in scalability, seamlessly supporting large user bases and complex projects with robust performance and adaptability.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

4.5

Feedback on Apache Subversion's stability is mixed, with ratings ranging from six to eight out of ten.

Sentiment score

8.3

GitHub is highly reliable, praised for seamless performance and minimal issues, with users rating its reliability very high.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Apache Subversion users seek improved merging, ease of use, and features like CI/CD integration and customized configurations akin to GitHub.

Users recommend improvements in GitHub's interface, integration, documentation, and tools addressing performance, learning curve, and licensing issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice.

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

If they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

I am providing this feedback for Copilot because it seems more widespread and more companies allow it rather than Amp, and it would be beneficial if they catch up with Amp on this capability.

reviewer2760345

Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Setup Cost

Apache Subversion is valued by enterprises for being open-source, cost-effective, and providing quality without licensing fees.

GitHub provides cost-effective pricing options for enterprises with free public repositories and paid private ones, despite licensing challenges.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

Valuable Features

Apache Subversion provides centralized version control, easy collaboration, and integration capabilities, enhancing code management and team productivity.

GitHub enhances collaboration with features like version control, automation, security, cloud access, and integration with Azure and Jenkins.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The pull request facility for code review.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 4.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 9.3%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	9.3%
Apache Subversion	4.2%
Other	86.5%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?

The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

Git vs Apache Subversion

Compared 27% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 17% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Apache Subversion product report

Version Control

January 2026

Download GitHub product report

January 2026

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent