Apache Subversion vs GitHub comparison

Read 95 GitHub reviews

3,284 Views
1,248 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Subversion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Apache Subversion and GitHub are both prominent version control systems, with GitHub being superior due to its diverse collaboration features, distributed model, and integrations that simplify development workflows.

Features: Apache Subversion offers centralized version control, making it straightforward, with strong binary file management and improved stability. GitHub has a distributed version control system and supports features like advanced collaboration, code review tools, and a rich set of integrations, making it ideal for modern development needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache Subversion could benefit from improved user interface, better community engagement, and enhanced workflow integrations. GitHub needs to address its pricing complexities, improve support for large binary files, and strengthen offline capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Apache Subversion can be simpler for on-premise setups requiring dedicated infrastructure. It primarily relies on community support. GitHub offers streamlined cloud-based deployment with comprehensive support options and numerous resources, making it easier for teams seeking minimal maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Subversion generally has low initial costs being open-source, but server maintenance can add expenses. GitHub uses a subscription model reflecting continuous innovation, with projects like GitHub Free and GitHub Pro starting at no cost and $4/month respectively, popular for reducing collaboration overhead and enhancing development speed, offering a favorable ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Subversion vs. GitHub Report (Updated: November 2025).

Apache Subversion vs. GitHub

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.0

Apache Subversion offers a cost-free solution for small teams but lacks ROI compared to Bitbucket's CI/CD integrations.

Sentiment score

5.6

GitHub provides efficient code management, cost benefits, secure code, and organizational advantages, enhancing market delivery and user experience.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.8

Apache Subversion users often rely on community support and online resources, rating direct support between 5 to 8 out of 10.

Sentiment score

6.2

Users primarily rely on community resources for support, but some desire quicker access to GitHub's technical support.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.5

Apache Subversion is scalable, supporting multiple instances and accommodating 10-20 users per instance, and is well-rated for scalability.

Sentiment score

7.9

GitHub efficiently supports global teams with scalable, cloud-based infrastructure, ensuring performance and stability for diverse user and project sizes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at Boxpeg

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

4.5

Feedback on Apache Subversion's stability is mixed, with ratings ranging from six to eight out of ten.

Sentiment score

8.8

GitHub is stable, supports over 1,000 users effectively, with transparency and reliable updates appreciated, despite minor issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Apache Subversion users seek improved merging, ease of use, and features like CI/CD integration and customized configurations akin to GitHub.

GitHub needs improved security, integration, AI enhancements, UI/UX, search, docs, automation, and support for better user experience.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

If they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Setup Cost

Apache Subversion is valued by enterprises for being open-source, cost-effective, and providing quality without licensing fees.

GitHub provides cost-effective subscription options with a free basic version, ideal for public use, and competitive pricing for enterprises.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

Valuable Features

Apache Subversion provides centralized version control, easy collaboration, and integration capabilities, enhancing code management and team productivity.

GitHub offers robust community support, security, version control, integration with DevOps tools, and flexibility for distributed teams.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Apache Subversion report

When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Categories and Ranking

Apache Subversion

Ranking in Version Control

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Apache Subversion is 3.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 8.1%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	8.1%
Apache Subversion	3.3%
Other	88.6%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Enables centralized code management but lacks modern CI/CD integrations

There is room for improvement in Apache Subversion, especially when comparing it with other version control systems such as GitHub or GitLab, where many improvements could be made. Improvements I would like to see in Apache Subversion include configurations, customizations, and functionalities such as those provided by GitHub Actions for immediate pipeline triggers, as well as the version controlling and CI/CD platform offered by GitLab. In future updates of Apache Subversion, I would like to see CI/CD integrations as well as build and deployment servers. The lack of latest features includes basic requirements such as pull requests, CI/CD platform integration, and artifact storage such as GitHub packages, which it does not offer.

Read full review

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Subversion?

I am satisfied with the pricing and licensing cost of Apache Subversion; it is very low compared to other products.

What needs improvement with Apache Subversion?

What is your primary use case for Apache Subversion?

The typical use case for Apache Subversion is to store the application code repositories, which is how we use this product in our company. For multiple projects, we are using Apache Subversion, and...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

GitHub is very stable for me with no performance issues.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Apache Subversion

Comparisons

Compared 31% of the time

Bitbucket vs Apache Subversion

Compared 19% of the time

Git vs Apache Subversion

Compared 18% of the time

More Apache Subversion Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Apache Subversion product report

Version Control

October 2025

Download GitHub product report

October 2025

Overview

The Apache LuceneTM project develops open-source search software, including Lucene Core (provides Java-based indexing and search technology), Solr (a high performance search server built using Lucene Core), Open Relevance Project (a subproject with the aim of collecting and distributing free materials for relevance testing and performance) and PyLucene (a Python port of the Core project)

Apache

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

IBM, General Electric, Amazon, HP, Facebook, Bank of America, American Express, AT&T, Nike, PayPal, Wells Fargo, Best Buy, Tesla Motors, Citi, The Home Depot

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent