


Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools.
With Apache JMeter, I have gained great statistics for performance and server metrics.
I have not seen a return on investment right now, as there is no improvement in Apache JMeter and reduction in cost, but I save time and reduce costs with Apache JMeter.
BlazeMeter has positively affected my ROI, significantly saving time, resources, and money.
With AI models ChatGPT, troubleshooting issues has become very easy for us.
The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.
Apache JMeter has strong support through its vast Java-based community on platforms like Stack Overflow.
Customer support for BlazeMeter is commendable, offering 24/7 assistance.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
I can rate it around eight because I think they are much faster than OpenText or Micro Focus.
We do have some methods where we can distribute the complete load between multiple systems and then try to do our testing.
JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.
This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
For scalability, I can rate Tricentis NeoLoad around three.
JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.
Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.
Previous versions of Apache JMeter were a little unstable, but the new versions are very stable.
BlazeMeter is incredibly stable and delivers accurate results consistently.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
With AI becoming more prominent, they can implement features where it can generate code by itself based on the results or provide suggestions.
Currently, we need to use multiple separate JMeter instances to simulate reductions in load, which isn't ideal.
The tool needs improvements related to client-side metrics, integrating with tools like YSlow or HTTP Watch, and enhancing mobile testing capabilities.
If BlazeMeter could automate integration across multiple pipelines and fetch the latest builds automatically, it would significantly enhance my experience.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
I would probably like to see some new functionalities for Tricentis NeoLoad, such as a converting mechanism.
Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost and license are free because Apache JMeter is open source.
It's a cost-effective solution.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
Regarding pricing, it is favorable compared to other tools, providing good value.
JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.
It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test.
Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
Unlike JMeter, which has limitations on user simulations, BlazeMeter allows me to test any number of users, helping my e-commerce website manage unpredictable traffic loads effectively while delivering accurate results I can trust to improve my systems.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
I find that my team is using the features at Tricentis NeoLoad most effectively, as my role is to get that data out of the tool, and they do the analysis.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Apache JMeter | 10.4% |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 10.7% |
| BlazeMeter | 5.8% |
| Other | 73.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 61 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
Apache JMeter is a versatile, open-source tool designed for performance and load testing, widely recognized for its user-friendly interface and robust test automation capabilities. It supports a range of protocols and integrates seamlessly into various environments, making it ideal for high-load scenarios.
Apache JMeter stands out in performance testing for its ability to handle high transactions per second and perform distributed load testing effectively. Its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness are enhanced by its user-friendly GUI, which simplifies the testing process. Despite memory consumption concerns, Apache JMeter remains a top choice due to its large community support, comprehensive scripting capabilities, and easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, allowing for continuous automated testing. Its robust protocol support meets diverse testing needs.
What are Apache JMeter's key features?In industries like finance and banking, Apache JMeter is used extensively for performance validation to ensure system robustness under heavy user loads. It's integrated into CI/CD pipelines for automated testing processes, allowing organizations to simulate real-world scenarios and ensure high-performance standards.
BlazeMeter offers cloud-based load generation with flexibility through open-source tools, supporting high concurrent user tests with a user-friendly interface. Its integrations enhance performance testing capabilities significantly, although challenges remain in speed and load generator provisioning.
BlazeMeter is a comprehensive performance testing platform that supports JMeter test scalability and integrates smoothly with tools like New Relic for detailed analytics. It supports API and performance testing, providing detailed reports and a scriptless testing feature. While known for global scalability and efficiency, users note delays in test execution, load provisioning, and seek improvements in mobile testing and integration capabilities with other tools. Pricing, documentation, customization options, and test scheduling features are areas for enhancement.
What are the most important features of BlazeMeter?BlazeMeter is utilized across industries for performance testing web and mobile applications to handle high loads and user behavior simulation. Companies use it for functional and regression testing, leveraging its capabilities for large-scale test orchestration and load distribution optimization. Testing applications across multiple networks and environments helps businesses meet their specific performance benchmarks.
Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.
Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.
What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.