Amazon MSK vs Apache Flink comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
7,940 views|6,237 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Apache Logo
10,777 views|7,316 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon MSK and Apache Flink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MSK vs. Apache Flink Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.""Overall, it is very cost-effective based on the workflow.""It offers good stability.""MSK has a private network that's an out-of-box feature.""It is a stable product.""The most valuable feature of Amazon MSK is the integration."

More Amazon MSK Pros →

"The top feature of Apache Flink is its low latency for fast, real-time data. Another great feature is the real-time indicators and alerts which make a big difference when it comes to data processing and analysis.""Allows us to process batch data, stream to real-time and build pipelines.""The setup was not too difficult.""This is truly a real-time solution.""Apache Flink's best feature is its data streaming tool.""It is user-friendly and the reporting is good.""It provides us the flexibility to deploy it on any cluster without being constrained by cloud-based limitations.""Apache Flink is meant for low latency applications. You take one event opposite if you want to maintain a certain state. When another event comes and you want to associate those events together, in-memory state management was a key feature for us."

More Apache Flink Pros →

Cons
"It does not autoscale. Because if you do keep it manually when you add a note to the cluster and then you register it, then it is scalable, but the fact that you have to go and do it, I think, makes it, again, a bit of some operational overhead when managing the cluster.""It should be more flexible, integration-wise.""It would be really helpful if Amazon MSK could provide a single installation that covers all the servers.""The product's schema support needs enhancement. It will help enhance integration with many kinds of languages of programming languages, especially for environments using languages like .NET.""Amazon MSK could improve on the features they offer. They are still lagging behind Confluence.""The configuration seems a little complex and the documentation on the product is not available."

More Amazon MSK Cons →

"Apache Flink's documentation should be available in more languages.""In terms of stability with Flink, it is something that you have to deal with every time. Stability is the number one problem that we have seen with Flink, and it really depends on the kind of problem that you're trying to solve.""The machine learning library is not very flexible.""There is a learning curve. It takes time to learn.""We have a machine learning team that works with Python, but Apache Flink does not have full support for the language.""The state maintains checkpoints and they use RocksDB or S3. They are good but sometimes the performance is affected when you use RocksDB for checkpointing.""One way to improve Flink would be to enhance integration between different ecosystems. For example, there could be more integration with other big data vendors and platforms similar in scope to how Apache Flink works with Cloudera. Apache Flink is a part of the same ecosystem as Cloudera, and for batch processing it's actually very useful but for real-time processing there could be more development with regards to the big data capabilities amongst the various ecosystems out there.""In terms of improvement, there should be better reporting. You can integrate with reporting solutions but Flink doesn't offer it themselves."

More Apache Flink Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of Amazon MSK is less than some competitor solutions, such as Confluence."
  • "The platform has better pricing than one of its competitors."
  • More Amazon MSK Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is an open-source platform that can be used free of charge."
  • "The solution is open-source, which is free."
  • "Apache Flink is open source so we pay no licensing for the use of the software."
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "It's an open source."
  • More Apache Flink Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.
    Top Answer:The product's schema support needs enhancement. It will help enhance integration with many kinds of languages of programming languages, especially for environments using languages like .NET. They… more »
    Top Answer:We use the software to facilitate building integrations between systems.
    Top Answer:The product helps us to create both simple and complex data processing tasks. Over time, it has facilitated integration and navigation across multiple data sources tailored to each client's needs. We… more »
    Top Answer:Flink is free, it's open source. Flink is open source.
    Top Answer:Apache Flink should improve its data capability and data migration.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    7,940
    Comparisons
    6,237
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    427
    Rating
    7.0
    5th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    10,777
    Comparisons
    7,316
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    423
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka
    Flink
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) is a fully managed service that enables you to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process streaming data. Amazon MSK provides the control-plane operations, such as those for creating, updating, and deleting clusters.

    Apache Flink is an open-source batch and stream data processing engine. It can be used for batch, micro-batch, and real-time processing. Flink is a programming model that combines the benefits of batch processing and streaming analytics by providing a unified programming interface for both data sources, allowing users to write programs that seamlessly switch between the two modes. It can also be used for interactive queries.

    Flink can be used as an alternative to MapReduce for executing iterative algorithms on large datasets in parallel. It was developed specifically for large to extremely large data sets that require complex iterative algorithms.

    Flink is a fast and reliable framework developed in Java, Scala, and Python. It runs on the cluster that consists of data nodes and managers. It has a rich set of features that can be used out of the box in order to build sophisticated applications.

    Flink has a robust API and is ready to be used with Hadoop, Cassandra, Hive, Impala, Kafka, MySQL/MariaDB, Neo4j, as well as any other NoSQL database.

    Apache Flink Features

    • Distributed execution of streaming programs on clusters of computers
    • Support for multiple data sources and sinks: this includes Hadoop file systems, databases, and other data sources
    • Streaming SQL query engine with support for windowing functions
    • Low latency query execution in milliseconds
    • Runs in a distributed fashion: it can be deployed on multiple machines or nodes to increase performance and reliability of data processing pipelines.
    • Powerful API that supports both batch and streaming applications
    • Runs on clusters of commodity hardware with minimal configuration
    • Can be integrated with other technologies, such as Apache Spark for complex data mining

    Apache Flink Benefits

    • Ease of use: Flink has an intuitive API and provides high-level abstractions for handling data streams. Even beginners in the field can work with the platform with ease.
    • Fault tolerance: Flink can automatically detect and recover from failures in the system.
    • Scalability: Flink scales to thousands of nodes. It can run on clusters of any size and the user does not have to worry about managing the cluster.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Apache Flink stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its low latency and its user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    The head of data and analytics at a computer software company notes, “The top feature of Apache Flink is its low latency for fast, real-time data. Another great feature is the real-time indicators and alerts which make a big difference when it comes to data processing and analysis.”

    Ertugrul A., manager at a computer software company, writes, “It's usable and affordable. It is user-friendly and the reporting is good.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    LogRhythm, Inc., Inter-American Development Bank, Scientific Technologies Corporation, LotLinx, Inc., Benevity, Inc.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Retailer5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon MSK vs. Apache Flink
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MSK vs. Apache Flink and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon MSK is ranked 6th in Streaming Analytics with 6 reviews while Apache Flink is ranked 5th in Streaming Analytics with 15 reviews. Amazon MSK is rated 7.2, while Apache Flink is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon MSK writes "Efficient real-time transaction tracking but time-consuming installation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apache Flink writes "A great solution with an intricate system and allows for batch data processing". Amazon MSK is most compared with Confluent, Amazon Kinesis, Azure Stream Analytics, Google Cloud Dataflow and Apache Spark Streaming, whereas Apache Flink is most compared with Amazon Kinesis, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Databricks, Azure Stream Analytics and IBM Streams. See our Amazon MSK vs. Apache Flink report.

    See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

    We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.