Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Amazon MSK offers a private network as an out-of-box feature.
The integration capabilities of Amazon MSK are highly valuable, allowing easy communication between systems.
Scalability in Amazon MSK is impressive, facilitating growth and adaptation within AWS.
Amazon MSK supports seamless installation, scaling, and deployment, providing ease of use.
Technical support offered by Amazon MSK is helpful, enhancing user experience.

CONS

Amazon MSK could be more flexible with integrations and offers fewer features compared to Confluence.
Amazon MSK does not autoscale automatically, leading to operational overhead when managing clusters manually.
Documentation for Amazon MSK is inadequate, making configuration challenging and confusing, especially with undocumented policy changes.
Amazon MSK's schema support requires enhancements to improve integration with various programming languages like .NET.
The cost of using Amazon MSK is high, with cloud costs increasing by 50% to 60%, outweighing any savings.
 

Amazon MSK Pros review quotes

reviewer2237604 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2024
Amazon MSK's scalability is very good.
Keorapetse Naane - PeerSpot reviewer
May 18, 2023
Overall, it is very cost-effective based on the workflow.
Aniruddh Kurundkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 19, 2023
It is a stable product.
Learn what your peers think about Amazon MSK. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
FW
Jun 12, 2024
Amazon MSK's separation of concerns and ease of creating and deploying new features are highly valuable. It just requires to assign them to the topic, and then anyone who needs to consume these messages can do so directly from Amazon MSK. This separation of concerns makes it very convenient, especially for new feature development, as developers can easily access the messages they need without having to deal with complex server communications or protocol setups.
FNU AKSHANSH - PeerSpot reviewer
May 9, 2024
Amazon MSK has good integration because our team has been undergoing significant changes. Coupling it with MSK within AWS is helpful. We don't have to set up additionals or monitor external environments. This
reviewer1500498 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 16, 2021
MSK has a private network that's an out-of-box feature.
PP
Feb 25, 2025
It provides installations, scaling, and other functionalities straight out of the box.
AnkurShukla - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 10, 2024
The solution's technical support was helpful.
Gustavo-Barbosa Dos Santos - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 8, 2024
Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.
reviewer2268408 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2023
It offers good stability.
 

Amazon MSK Cons review quotes

reviewer2237604 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2024
One of the reasons why we prefer Kafka is because the support is a little bit difficult to manage with Amazon MSK.
Keorapetse Naane - PeerSpot reviewer
May 18, 2023
It does not autoscale. Because if you do keep it manually when you add a note to the cluster and then you register it, then it is scalable, but the fact that you have to go and do it, I think, makes it, again, a bit of some operational overhead when managing the cluster.
Aniruddh Kurundkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 19, 2023
It would be really helpful if Amazon MSK could provide a single installation that covers all the servers.
Learn what your peers think about Amazon MSK. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RP
Jul 3, 2025
We need to create connectors in Amazon MSK, but there are no default connectors in AWS for that purpose.
FW
Jun 12, 2024
In my opinion, there are areas in Amazon MSK that could be improved, particularly in terms of configuration. Initially setting it up and getting it connected was quite challenging. The naming conventions for policies were updated by AWS, and some were undocumented, leading to confusion with outdated materials. It took us weeks of trial and error before discovering new methods through hidden tutorials and official documentation.
reviewer1500498 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 16, 2021
It should be more flexible, integration-wise.
PP
Feb 25, 2025
The cost of using Amazon MSK is high, which is a significant disadvantage, as the increase in cloud costs by 50% to 60% does not justify the savings.
AnkurShukla - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 10, 2024
Horizontal scale-out is actually not easy, making it an area where improvements are required.
Gustavo-Barbosa Dos Santos - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 8, 2024
The product's schema support needs enhancement. It will help enhance integration with many kinds of languages of programming languages, especially for environments using languages like .NET.
reviewer2268408 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2023
The configuration seems a little complex and the documentation on the product is not available.