We performed a comparison between Amazon Macie and Zscaler DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool gives confidence that our configuration is safe."
"The tool's performance is good."
"As a cloud-based service, it is very easily implemented."
"On DLP terms, Zscaler Cloud DLP ensures that data doesn't go outside of the organization. So on the network level, Zscaler does a pretty good job."
"The product’s most valuable features are data discovery, activity control, and zero trust exchange."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It's one of the easier products on the market as far as set-ups and deployments. Even across their whole product suite, they've made it pretty simple."
"Zscaler Cloud DLP provides you with basic DLP features that you get out of the box such as keywords, regular expressions, and data identifiers, for example, your social security numbers, and credit card numbers, with everything built into the product, so you can directly use those features within the policies. You don't need to create it from scratch, and to me, this is the biggest benefit of Zscaler Cloud DLP. You have a lot of templates to choose from in the solution, rather than having to create templates from scratch or reinvent templates."
"Its impressive scalability allows the combination of multiple dictionaries and using them as one engine, resulting in narrower data loss gaps."
"The solution is the best for storage."
"Amazon Macie is expensive."
"You won't find anything that can help you with the configuration part and other areas related to the product if you search for proper or exact details of Zscaler Cloud DLP online in very easy language."
"The tool must provide IP-blocking features."
"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."
"In the next release, I would like to see RE2 Regex supported."
"On the improvement side, when we bypass certain internet traffic types, it's currently recommended to have a one-click option, but audio and video aren't always supported. Thus, we need to bypass that kind of traffic. So, it is an area of improvement."
"The customers would benefit from more robust documentation and conversations around configurations, as it is slightly complex."
"Zscaler Cloud DLP needs to improve its compatibility with other security tools."
"We have issues with the tool's maintenance and networking. It should be able to work in offline mode as well."
Amazon Macie is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Zscaler DLP is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Amazon Macie is rated 6.6, while Zscaler DLP is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon Macie writes "The solution's performance is good but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler DLP writes "Provides a range of security measures to protect network traffic". Amazon Macie is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas Zscaler DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Varonis Platform. See our Amazon Macie vs. Zscaler DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
