We performed a comparison between Amazon Macie and Symantec Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool gives confidence that our configuration is safe."
"The tool's performance is good."
"The data-at-rest features are the most valuable because they let us identify data infected with ransomware and prevent employees from being exploited through phishing attacks. If an employee is compromised, the attacker can access servers and deposit ransomware. This enables the attacker to exfiltrate data remotely using employees' credentials. It might be valuable data that could cause a business reputational and financial damage if stolen and publicized. It could also be credit card data or personal health information stored on critical servers."
"Technical support is very professional and responsive."
"The dashboard, management section, and reporting are good."
"The most valuable feature is file-level DLP."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be partial enlisting."
"The product helps with blocking sensitive data transmission and permission management."
"The Network Monitor component is the most advanced on the market. Combined with the other Network DLP components."
"We work in the banking field. We deploy data loss prevention. Our branch protects our clients' data, credit card numbers, account numbers, and other confidential and sensitive data."
"Amazon Macie is expensive."
"Symantec DLP doesn't provide complete cloud coverage. We need another DLP solution to monitor our cloud applications."
"There is room for improvement in the remote control capabilities of the DLP solution."
"That fine tuning has to be done for the customer as well as the vendor. So if I take Symantec DLP, we have to have some final fine tuning but we may need some time developing this depending on the customer. This is an area where something can be done to improve the product."
"The product must improve its interface."
"Symantec could be better with infrastructure."
"I would like for the administrator management interface to improve. It's kind of old and slow. Updating it would make this solution better."
"The product's technical support services need improvement."
"The enforce service is difficult to understand, and free courses made available on the internet would be useful."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Macie is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews. Amazon Macie is rated 6.6, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon Macie writes "The solution's performance is good but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". Amazon Macie is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. See our Amazon Macie vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
