Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Macie and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Forcepoint, CoSoSys and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP).
To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: September 2023).
735,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's performance is good."

More Amazon Macie Pros →

"The product is easy to configure.""I rate Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's stability a ten out of ten.""One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site.""It has helped our clients to reduce the time to action on insider threats because it can be integrated.""Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place.""There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems.""We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"Amazon Macie is expensive."

More Amazon Macie Cons →

"They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing.""There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful.""Technical support is awful.""The platform can be challenging to navigate and has the potential for improvement.""The solution should provide better integration with other systems.""I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database. It is seamless when it comes to Microsoft documents but is not so with third-party source codes. Microsoft needs to work on it a little bit more.""A site can have different containers where you store data. We have always wanted to apply compliance, labels, and policies at the container level, rather than to an outer shell or at the site level. That is something we have been looking forward to and I believe Microsoft is already planning something like that."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."
  • "The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."
  • "It's a little bit pricey compared to competitors, but it's not too high."
  • "We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."
  • More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    735,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's performance is good.
    Top Answer:Amazon Macie is expensive.
    Top Answer:I rate Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's stability a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on. The prices are quite reasonable, but unfortunately, I don't know the hourly rates since they are globally… more »
    Top Answer:I currently work in the financial domain, and we have very strict regulations from national banks and the group side. Domain-related improvements could be really useful for organizations and banks… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    911
    Comparisons
    715
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    172
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    7,407
    Comparisons
    4,539
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    889
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Macie is a security service that uses machine learning to automatically discover, classify, and protect sensitive data in AWS. Amazon Macie recognizes sensitive data such as personally identifiable information (PII) or intellectual property, and provides you with dashboards and alerts that give visibility into how this data is being accessed or moved. The fully managed service continuously monitors data access activity for anomalies, and generates detailed alerts when it detects risk of unauthorized access or inadvertent data leaks. Amazon Macie is available to protect data stored in Amazon S3.

    At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

    Offer
    Learn more about Amazon Macie
    Learn more about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
    Sample Customers
    EDMUNDS, AUTODESK
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government7%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Retailer14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
    September 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Forcepoint, CoSoSys and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: September 2023.
    735,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon Macie is ranked 17th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 1 review while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews. Amazon Macie is rated 5.0, while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon Macie writes "The solution's performance is good but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention writes "Integrates well, connects with iOS and Android devices, and takes into account critical regulations from around the world". Amazon Macie is most compared with SecureTrust Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and Nightfall, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Intune, Zscaler Cloud DLP and Digital Guardian.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.