"It's very stable and the performance is good."
"It is easy to use."
"It has a dynamic scaling capacity which is very helpful."
"The initial setup is easy. The deployment is fast."
"It scales well and is flexible."
"I like the storage, all the codes like Lambda and Amazon EMR."
"The features with Amazon AWS that I have found most valuable are its flexibility and high availability. These are the most important and attractive points for me."
"The solution can scale quite well."
"It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us."
"The feedback we are getting from our customers, especially here in Turkey where the exchange rate fluctuates regularly, is that the solution is quite expensive."
"They do not yet have a complete solution for APM monitoring. But this, along with real user monitoring, is something that they are actively working on improving."
"The features that should be improved are that there should be better clarity on their invoicing. There are so many things they charge for - high line items in the invoice. I think there should be more clarity and more ease of use with their billing. I'd like to see better ease of use of with the billing console and a clear dashboard to understand the usage."
"It should be easier to monitor the performance and generate analytic information so that we can determine how to provide better support for our clients."
"Amazon AWS is a very poor product for students. Microsoft Azure is a better solution."
"There is a feature called Kinesis, which has to do with image processing. There are a few artificial intelligence tools that Amazon AWS should improve on."
"The technical support should be better than what is on offer right now."
"The pricing is reasonable but there is always room to be better."
"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 167 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 20th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while QuickBase is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Flexible, scales well, and offers good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "A low-code platform for creating apps quickly and connecting work activities, but it needs a modern UI and better connectivity with other platforms". Amazon AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform, OpenShift, IBM Public Cloud and Linode, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, ServiceNow, OutSystems, Appian and Microsoft Azure.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
