Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alteryx vs DataRobot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Alteryx users praise its quick ROI, process automation, AI opportunities, and efficiency despite its high cost.
Sentiment score
9.0
DataRobot enhanced prediction accuracy, reduced analysis time, simplified processes, and improved efficiency, leading to better decisions and cost savings.
Alteryx helps familiarize managers with artificial intelligence-driven possibilities.
On average, we're saving about 10 to 15 hours per project.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Alteryx offers responsive customer service and valuable community support, though some users note longer response times and premium service pushes.
Sentiment score
7.5
DataRobot excels in customer service and scalability, but could improve response speed and documentation for large datasets.
The customer service was not good because we weren't premium support users.
They could be improved with more examples of use cases, but they are fit for purpose.
I contacted customer support once or twice, and they were quick to respond.
They answer all my questions and share guidance on using DataRobot scripts if certain functionalities are not available in the UI.
Being cloud-hosted enables automatic resource scaling, which supports collaboration across teams.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Alteryx is praised for smooth scalability, efficient data management, integration flexibility despite noted high scaling costs by some.
Sentiment score
4.6
DataRobot is scalable, integrates easily, automates processes, supports multiple models, and handles large data volumes efficiently.
Alteryx is scalable, and I would give it eight out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Alteryx is praised for stability and speed with minor issues, excelling in data processing over competitors but needing cloud improvements.
Sentiment score
7.7
DataRobot is praised for stability and reliability, with enhancements improving user satisfaction across diverse analytics scenarios.
I didn't need to reach out to Alteryx for support because available documents usually provide enough information to resolve issues.
I have not encountered any lagging, crashing, or instability in the system during these three months of usage.
 

Room For Improvement

Alteryx needs enhancements in visualization, cloud integration, pricing, scalability, and support for machine learning and database connectivity.
DataRobot faces customization, integration, and performance challenges; improved AI support, transparency, and community engagement are needed.
The cost is a factor, so we're looking at solutions that are free to implement.
The tool could include more native connectors, such as for global ERPs, instead of requiring additional fees for these connections.
The support structure changed; initially, we received great support, however, it later became less reliable due to licensing issues and a tiered support system.
DataRobot is a UI-based tool, which means it cannot provide all the features I might manually implement through notebooks or Python.
There is a lack of transparency in the models; sometimes it feels like a black box.
 

Setup Cost

Alteryx's high pricing, ranging from $5,000 to $80,000 annually, offers discounts for multi-year subscriptions and justifiable ROI for larger firms.
<p>DataRobot provides scalable, cost-effective AI solutions with flexible pricing tailored to enterprise needs and usage volume.</p>
Some were hesitant to pay $4000 per seat.
Alteryx is more cost-effective compared to Informatica licenses, offering savings.
It has a fair price when considering a larger-scale implementation.
The setup cost was minimal because it's cloud-hosted, eliminating the need for heavy on-premises infrastructure, allowing us to start using it immediately after purchase.
 

Valuable Features

Alteryx provides user-friendly drag-and-drop analytics, supporting complex data tasks with strong integration and advanced features for diverse industries.
DataRobot automates feature engineering and model testing, enhancing productivity and decision-making with user-friendly, scalable integration.
Alteryx not only represents data but also supports decision-making by suggesting the next steps.
Analysts who do not have any coding experience can still work on the transformation and preparation of data, which is quite useful.
It offered quick development, with the ability to process large datasets.
DataRobot has positively impacted our organization in many ways. First, it has improved efficiency; tasks such as model testing, feature engineering, and predictions that used to take us days or weeks can now be accomplished in hours.
By automating highly technical aspects like model comparison, DataRobot enhances productivity and reduces project timelines from three months to less than one month.
 

Categories and Ranking

Alteryx
Ranking in Predictive Analytics
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (5th), Data Preparation Tools (1st)
DataRobot
Ranking in Predictive Analytics
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
AI Development Platforms (13th), AIOps (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Predictive Analytics category, the mindshare of Alteryx is 12.1%, down from 24.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DataRobot is 7.7%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Predictive Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Alteryx12.1%
DataRobot7.7%
Other80.2%
Predictive Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Theresa McLaughlin - PeerSpot reviewer
Quick development enables seamless data processing despite occasional support issues
There were times when the product would fail during development without an apparent reason. The support structure changed; initially, we received great support, however, it later became less reliable due to licensing issues and a tiered support system. Licensing negotiations were problematic, affecting our product usage. For instance, our licenses were temporarily lost during negotiations when an agreement couldn't be reached.
Naqash Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation has improved efficiency and decision-making while big data handling and transparency still need work
Aside from the many advantages of DataRobot, I believe there are areas that could be improved based on my experience. There is a lack of transparency in the models; sometimes it feels like a black box. For example, when I uploaded a large data set of about two gigabytes for processing, the time taken was slower than expected. Additionally, the handling of bigger data sets could be better, as it performs extremely well with smaller datasets but can lag with larger ones. The integration with some other tools used in our organization can also be challenging, and more flexibility for custom pre-processing and advanced model tuning would be beneficial. In terms of support and documentation, I believe improvements are needed. For instance, the response time from DataRobot could be quicker, which would be appreciated when we need assistance. The documentation is generally sufficient, but it can be lengthy and could use more real-world examples and step-by-step tutorials for better clarity. Lastly, creating a client community where users can share experiences and solutions might enhance the overall value and learning curve.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Predictive Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise51
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?
One of the differences is that with Alteryx you can use it as an ETL and analytics tool. Please connect with me directly if you want to know more.
What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?
Alteryx is an extremely easy and flexible data tool, flexible in terms of drag and drop toolset and also has python, R integrations if your team requires this. It can handle over 2 billion rows of...
What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?
I am not familiar with IBM SPSS Modeler, therefore, I cannot compare these two products. Regarding Alteryx I can say the following: - An excellent desktop tool for Data Prep and analytics. - Featu...
What needs improvement with DataRobot?
DataRobot is a UI-based tool, which means it cannot provide all the features I might manually implement through notebooks or Python. In this aspect, I see room for improvement in its functionality.
What is your primary use case for DataRobot?
In our day-to-day use, I utilize DataRobot to speed up our development process through its GUI capability. Once I set up our connection with a back-end data set, whatever the project I work on next...
What advice do you have for others considering DataRobot?
I would recommend DataRobot because if there is something not included in the UI, I have the freedom to use its Python API, which extends the capability for different use cases. Additionally, I wou...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AnalyticsIq Inc., belk, BloominBrands Inc., Cardinalhealth, Cineplex, Dairy Queen
Harmoney, Zidisha, ONE Marketing, DonorBureau, Trupanion, Avant
Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx vs. DataRobot and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.