Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Airtable vs Planview ProjectPlace comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Airtable's automation enhanced efficiency and cost savings, eliminating manual tasks and showcasing its potential beyond basic functions.
Sentiment score
5.6
Planview ProjectPlace enhances ROI through streamlined tracking, resource assessment, and improved visibility, though ROI varies with feature exploration.
I can automate the process so it automatically populates data into the Airtable base and performs any necessary calculations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
Airtable's support is responsive and polite, but response times vary, with better service for enterprise clients.
Sentiment score
6.5
Users have mixed experiences with Planview ProjectPlace support, praising resources but citing issues with service quality and response times.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Airtable handles small to medium data well, but faces limitations with large sets, ideal for mid-sized structured projects.
Sentiment score
7.0
Planview ProjectPlace scales efficiently, accommodating increased users and projects, offering a collaborative space despite minor technical constraints.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Airtable is generally reliable, with high ratings, though some users note downtime and speed issues with extensive usage.
Sentiment score
7.7
Planview ProjectPlace is generally stable, though Indian users report occasional crashes; newer versions address some issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Airtable users seek improved API call limits, data storage, loading speeds, flexible pricing, automation, interfaces, documentation, and tutorials.
Planview ProjectPlace needs improved reporting, UI updates, better integration, and enhanced performance for competitive functionality and user experience.
If they show step-by-step guides for automations, this will help them attract more clients who are willing to learn and use their system.
 

Setup Cost

Airtable offers flexible pricing by plan and user count, starting with a free plan and additional costs for advanced features.
Planview ProjectPlace offers moderate costs and functionalities but requires staffing, with confusing licensing models and potential unexpected expenses.
 

Valuable Features

Airtable offers user-friendly features, automation, no-code apps, intuitive navigation, seamless interface, and extensive integration for efficient task management.
Planview ProjectPlace boosts collaboration with real-time updates, flexible workspaces, and seamless integration, enhancing project visibility and resource management.
Everybody has a particular base for different purposes, so you add information to those bases, and anybody can access it at any point in time anywhere in the world.
It was effective for easy reporting and data on our user feedback.
 

Categories and Ranking

Airtable
Ranking in Project Management Software
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Product Management Software (1st)
Planview ProjectPlace
Ranking in Project Management Software
26th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Airtable is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview ProjectPlace is 2.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ashwini Ramanisankar - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, quick implementation, and effortless database creation
The interfaces provided by the company have certainly undergone significant improvements since their earlier versions. The growth and progress have been remarkable. I have personally shared numerous feedback points and observed the prompt implementation of changes within a few months, which is highly commendable. However, I must admit that I have encountered several challenges with their interfaces. In terms of the interface, there are certain improvements I would suggest. For instance, a global search feature is currently absent, which would greatly enhance usability. Additionally, incorporating a search function within automation would be highly beneficial. The current limitation of fifty automation per base is insufficient for our needs and could be expanded. Moreover, there is a need for a longer native time delay in automation to allow for more flexible syncing. Currently, the syncing time is set at approximately three to five minutes, which could be increased for smoother operations.
Eduardo Maya - PeerSpot reviewer
A complete and useful solution, but it should be easy to use, and they should provide fast support
Their support team should provide the answers fast because it impacts our daily operations. We use the app every day. We have about 70 projects managed in the app, but their responses are too slow. They can take three or four days to analyze a problem. We have a connection-related problem, which is impacting our daily operations, but we have had the same status for the last two months. It is not easy. The deployment of the application and its functionalities are not easy. It is a complex process to create accounts, names, and catalogs. There should be more operational reports. They have a set of internal reports, but they can't be customized. You don't have the permissions to configure your own reports, which is a very big issue. Currently, you have to ask for permission in order to configure simple filters. You have to ask a third party to configure it. It is expensive, and it also takes a lot of time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
9%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Computer Software Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Airtable?
The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements.
What needs improvement with Airtable?
I haven't used it in a while, so I cannot really provide specific areas that need improvement.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Projectplace
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cole Haan, Expedia, BuzzFeed, Medium, Shopify, Box, JetBlue
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Florida Virtual Campus, Amazing.com, 2degrees NZ, Kendrick Content & Consulting
Find out what your peers are saying about Airtable vs. Planview ProjectPlace and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.