Jama Connect vs Jira comparison

Jama and Atlassian are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Jama is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8, while Atlassian is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. Jama holds a 3.9% mindshare in ALM, compared to Atlassian’s 11.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Jama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Jama Connect

Read 17 Jama Connect reviews

4,411 Views
2,250 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Jira

Read 282 Jira reviews

19,738 Views
9,672 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Jama Connect

Jira

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Jama Connect and Jira compete in project and requirements management. Jama Connect stands out for its requirements management tools, while Jira is preferred for its agile project management capabilities based on data comparisons.

Features: Jama Connect offers comprehensive requirements traceability, an integrated test management module, and visibility metrics for easy project navigation. Jira provides agile workflow management, flexible integration options, and customizable dashboards supporting agile methodologies.

Room for Improvement: Jama Connect could improve user interface customization, enhance third-party integrations, and streamline its training modules for greater ease of use. Jira can refine its reporting features, simplify navigation for new users, and expand its non-IT project management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jama Connect supports both cloud and on-premise deployments, offering premium customer support for easy adaptation to different enterprise needs. Jira is primarily cloud-based, ensuring quick setup with integrated services and scalable support tiers for software teams.

Pricing and ROI: Jama Connect's higher initial setup costs are offset by significant ROI in compliance-heavy industries, providing tailored features. Jira offers a cost-effective entry with flexible pricing options, delivering strong ROI through its extensive scalability and feature set for agile implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed Jama Connect vs. Jira Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. Jira

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jama Connect

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

10th

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jira

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

1st

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

282

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jama Connect is 3.9%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jira is 11.2%, down from 21.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jira	11.2%
Jama Connect	3.9%
Other	84.9%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Juergen Albrecht

Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH

Has required better change management and easier tool integration but supports certification needs and strong collaboration

The visualization tools are nearly similar, so it does not matter if you use DNG or even Jama Connect, but at Jama Connect, the selection and setup for running complex scripts is very powerful and fast compared to IBM, which is sometimes very slow due to the complex software which has lost focus on usability. The collaboration capabilities of Jama Connect are fantastic, and when comparing IBM, PTC, and Jama Connect, they are nearly equal because all three have recognized the importance of collaboration in today's work environment. The feature that I really appreciate about Jama Connect is its allowance for certifications through the FAA and FDA organizations in the US, which in the past was not possible for smaller companies because larger ones, such as Boeing and Airbus, often advised against using unapproved tools.

Read full review

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The impact that Jama Connect provides for my company overall is significant as it saves a huge amount of time."

"I like Jama Connect because it's easy to use and understand. The widgets are great, and linking is straightforward. The solution is not complex compared to its competitors."

"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."

"The user experience is better than the competition."

"We use Jama Connect mainly for requirements management."

"Traceability is a key differentiator for Jama Connect, especially compared to Jira."

"Provides suitable tools for managing regulatory requirements."

"Jama Connect is a good tool for the entire software development cycle."

More Jama Connect pros

"The most valuable feature is managing software development."

"We are using Jira for our test management, recording our inspecting results, and regulating the evidence in the report."

"The dynamic communication and the ability to customize it the way we want are the most valuable features."

"It's really smart how they connected third-party vendors into their own marketplace. You can create and add apps. Anybody can do it."

"Tracking and accountability have been improved, as with the advanced workflows, one can ensure processes are followed, and it is easily seen through one of the many reporting options exactly who is doing what and when."

"The sprint tracking is really helpful and very convenient."

"We can create multiple boards for the same product backlogs."

"We use Jira mostly for task coordination and assignment, and additionally scrum methodologies define work items and bug issues, and if we create any bugs all of them are fixed."

More Jira pros

Cons

"Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable."

"There are a few areas where Jama Connect can improve. One suggestion is to enhance the built-in feature of profile generation."

"I believe one of the weak points is the reporting side. You must export inter-readable reports from Jama if you do not use the system as a repository for your design history file. Jama is great if you keep it in Jama, but reporting out requires some customization to get it right."

"t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information."

"It is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved."

"The user interface could be modernized and the product lacks project management functionalities."

"There are delays sometimes from the Jama Connect team in resolving issues."

"I think Jama Connect's change management feature is not well developed at this stage, as it lacks many steps for marks, building IDs, and the usual functionalities such as comparing past changes and generating reports automatically."

More Jama Connect cons

"I would like to have a future-proof idea of the cost and the roadmap for my class."

"Scripts should be more readily available for implementing projects."

"It is not capturing the number of hours for which each person has worked on certain things. We use many add-ons to let resources enter the time in the user story itself. We use an add-on called Tempo, but it is kind of a lousy add-on. It is not straightforward. Rather than helping us, it creates a lot of confusion. So, instead of looking out for the additional add-on, I would prefer to have the timesheet entered as a part of Jira itself. They are anyways capturing every information they could for each user story, and then we are able to break down all the task lists. For each task, we're also assigning a resource. So, while we're doing it, why can't they allow the users to enter the time that can be created as a report? Right now, we need to acquire the add-on, and the add-on is not great. It is not helping. The add-on is also not free."

"The following definitely need improvement: UI, speed, and mobile app functionality."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"The Classic UI is a little bit messy; the UX experience is also a little bit messy and is not according to the expectation of a tech user."

"Jira could be easier to use, especially for administrative tasks. It's quite complex, so it's important to understand it well. While the reporting and dashboards are good, there's room for improvement in some areas where extra features would be helpful."

"I have noticed a problem with Jira in the Philippines. In the Philippines, there are only a few companies that offer local support, which is alarming."

More Jira cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost seems very competitive with other offerings."

"Jama Connect is a little pricy."

"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

"If you want to have creative licenses, pricing may be an issue with the licenses, as it can become quite expensive over time to serve many people."

"It is subscription-based, and we probably pay yearly. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of price."

"There are other solutions that are free making this solution seem expensive in comparison."

"As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website."

"For very small companies, if you have less than 10 individuals, it is $10 a year for each of the products. When we were a part of the enterprise and had more than 10 people using it, or before they came up with this solution for small companies, it was $2,500 a year for the license for Jira and Confluence, and I believe something like $600 a year to perpetuate the license. I can't remember if it was $600 or $2,500 annually. It was for up to 25 people at the time, and this was in the early 2000s and mid 2000s."

"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost."

"The licensing cost for Jira is typically around seven dollars per user, though it may vary depending on regional variations. This cost is for a subscription-based model rather than a one-time purchase. I rate its pricing a seven out of ten."

"The price seems reasonable to me. It's very similar to Splunk."

"The price of Jira is reasonable."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

28%

Healthcare Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	108
Midsize Enterprise	60
Large Enterprise	152

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Jama Connect?

I think Jama Connect's change management feature is not well developed at this stage, as it lacks many steps for marks, building IDs, and the usual functionalities such as comparing past changes an...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jama Connect?

I am currently dealing with all options based on what the customer wants because my goal is not to promote one tool over another, but to identify the customer's problems and decide on the most suit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Jama Connect?

At the moment, from what I hear from clients and from my own use, I would rate Jama Connect between five to six. I have not considered new improvements for PTC Integrity regarding interface, automa...

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Jama Connect

Compared 16% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs Jama Connect

Compared 9% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Jama Connect

Compared 8% of the time

Codebeamer vs Jama Connect

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jama Connect

Compared 5% of the time

More Jama Connect Competitors

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 5% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs Jira

Compared 2% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect

May 2026

Download Jama Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Jira

May 2026

Download Jira product report

Also Known As

No data available

Jira Software

Overview

Jama Connect is a requirements and test management platform with robust traceability and a user-friendly interface, providing tools for regulatory compliance and enhanced project tracking within workflows.

Jama Connect offers comprehensive management of requirements, test cases, and change processes. The platform enhances traceability with visibility into documentation and integrates seamlessly for data management in regulated industries. Its real-time dashboard and impact analysis tools help in informed decision-making. Despite some collaboration and interface limits, Jama Connect supports lifecycle management through efficient document and specification tracking, integrating with solutions like Google App Store and Microsoft Azure.

What are the Key Features of Jama Connect?

Traceability: Provides detailed tracking and documentation management.
User-Friendly Navigation: Easy-to-use interface that simplifies workflow.
Test Management: Modular test tools streamline processes.
Integration: Compatible with various data management tools, essential for compliance.
Impact Analysis: Informs critical decision-making.

What are the Benefits and ROI in Using Jama Connect?

Efficiency: Consolidates requirements and test cases to boost productivity.
Regulatory Compliance: Templates and tools ensure adherence to standards.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork across projects.
Real-Time Insights: Dashboards offer immediate data for decision-making.
Lifecycle Support: Manages the full product lifecycle from documentation to validation.

Healthcare and regulated industries utilize Jama Connect to manage requirements and integrate workflows while ensuring compliance. Its features are tailored to support the complex documentation and validation demands of these sectors, improving traceability and lifecycle management.

Jama

Jira is a comprehensive tool favored by teams for its ability to streamline project management and enhance Agile workflows. Its versatile features, such as customization options and integration capabilities, enable efficient task management and collaboration.

Jira supports Agile methodologies through its adaptability and robust functionalities. Teams benefit from its customizable workflows, enabling seamless integration with third-party applications. Despite its complexity in customization and interface challenges, Jira is invaluable for sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking. It provides strong reporting tools, though some users highlight areas for improvement in documentation and stability. It's especially useful for IT, development, and marketing teams to maintain productivity and effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Jira?

Customization: Allows crafting specific workflows and processes tailored to team needs.
Agile Compatibility: Supports Scrum and Kanban boards for efficient Agile practices.
API Integration: Offers robust integration options with numerous plugins and tools.
Reporting Tools: Provides detailed analytics for informed sprint planning and tracking.

What benefits should users expect from Jira?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and teamwork across departments.
Improved Task Management: Streamlines tracking of tasks and issues for projects.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse team requirements through customizable features.
Efficiency: Boosts productivity with support for Agile methodologies.

Jira's implementation in software development and project management sectors underscores its suitability for managing complex projects. Its use extends to QA and marketing for organizing workflows and ensuring effective task distribution. Despite some areas needing refinement, Jira remains integral for teams aiming to boost collaboration and maintain streamlined project processes.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

Jama Connect vs. Jira

April 2026

Free Report: Jama Connect vs. Jira

Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jama Connect vs. Jira report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.