"It is good at requirements management and test management."
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."
"Most of my work is keeping track of what's been going on and identifying what is blocking future work. What I like about this solution is you can create a consolidated customized dashboard out of your files to identify what's been going on and identify who has how much data assigned to them."
"The solution is very scalable and flexible."
"Kanban boards are most valuable"
"One of the most valuable features is querying because the jQuery function is very good. Additionally, we can create good designs very easily."
"It's a very complete product overall."
"Jira is flexible and accessible for the end-user. It lets users track their requests. The look and feel are good for our purposes."
"We use it for capacity planning. We need to gauge and assess whatever is coming to our pipeline and then everything comes to the pipeline, appears as a pic, and then based on that, we create the story points and we take it from there."
"It's an open-sourced product that is easy to customize."
"I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."
"The initial setup could be better, it's complicated."
"The GUI should have much better features like more graphical illustrations. There are some cases or benchmarks that we are trying to capture into a dashboard GUI's graphical summary, but unfortunately JIRA is not able to do that."
"Lacks field-level permission in the cloud version."
"I would prefer it if the solution was more intuitive."
"Slow when integrating with other components."
"Could offer an improved user experience."
"Having more seamless integration with Confluence would really help us track our product management activity and other product details in one place."
"I'd like some more features around software testing. I'd like to see some more stuff done around data testing. That's what I'm most interested in."
"It should be connected to ServiceNow."
Jama Connect is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 137 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 6.6, while Jira is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "Reasonably priced, stable, user-friendly, and has good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "Great for collaboration, very stable, and extracting data is straightforward". Jama Connect is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Polarion Requirements, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Polarion ALM and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Micro Focus ALM Octane, TFS, IBM Rational DOORS and IBM Rational ClearQuest. See our Jama Connect vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
