We performed a comparison between Agiloft Workflow and BPM and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's very safe. It has a high degree of security, much better than many other solutions I have researched."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The solution is good for data models."
"It has an open BPM"
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"Agiloft does not have a good user interface."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
Earn 20 points
Agiloft Workflow and BPM is ranked 45th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. Agiloft Workflow and BPM is rated 9.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Agiloft Workflow and BPM writes "Easy to use with a high degree of security and excellent flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Agiloft Workflow and BPM is most compared with , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.