ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Apache and Broadcom are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Apache is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Apache holds a 22.0% mindshare in MQ, compared to Broadcom’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

ActiveMQ

Read 28 ActiveMQ reviews

4,388 Views
4,169 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 84 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

4,408 Views
1,366 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ActiveMQ

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and ActiveMQ are both open-source tools catering to different IT needs. VMware Tanzu leads in database performance and analytics, while ActiveMQ stands out in messaging and ease of use.

Features: VMware Tanzu excels with high performance, scalability, and integration with Hadoop and Big Data. Its robust parallel processing capabilities make it extremely efficient for analytics. ActiveMQ is notable for message queuing, providing features like message persistence, clustering, and support for multiple protocols.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu could improve stability and integration features, and simplify complex administrative tasks. ActiveMQ can refine clustering capabilities, improve its monitoring console, and enhance documentation and support for additional protocols.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu offers hybrid and public cloud deployment options, with customer service varying in quality. ActiveMQ is mainly deployed on-premises, with support that is generally robust but often reliant on community forums.

Pricing and ROI: Both VMware Tanzu and ActiveMQ are cost-effective due to their open-source nature. VMware Tanzu's paid features offer flexibility and value for advanced functionalities, whereas ActiveMQ's affordability remains appealing, providing significant functionality at no cost.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,044 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (6th), Relational Databases Tools (13th), Data Warehouse (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of ActiveMQ is 22.0%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 7.5%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ActiveMQ	22.0%
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	7.5%
Other	70.5%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Q&A Highlights

Miriam Tover

Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot

Jun 27, 2019

What is the biggest difference between ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ has a larger installed base and more active OSS community.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

MoumitaDas

Software Engineer III at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Integration capabilities enhance message handling without human interaction

With ActiveMQ there should be more options. If you work with other technologies, for example, Java, there are many options. We can integrate the way we want ActiveMQ. We can create partitions and clusters, but AP is not providing such options currently. It only provides time, request response timing, the number of requests that need to be handled, and protocol types. The configuration needs to be broadened inside AP to perform in a better way. Sometimes issues arise in production with ActiveMQ due to the number of requests. For example, if you have configured one thousand requests at a time and it receives one thousand and one messages at a time, it breaks. The configuration aspect is tricky. When configurations are proper, ActiveMQ almost has zero errors.

Read full review

Moisés Guillén

Has improved server deployment speed and simplified Kubernetes cluster administration

My main use case for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is Tanzu Basic TKB version 2.4 I focus on the creation of Kubernetes clusters with VMware Tanzu Data Solutions. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has positively impacted my organization because it is efficient, easy, fast, and aids in the creation and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward and only takes a few minutes."

"The most important feature is that it's best for JVM-related languages and JMS integration."

"ActiveMQ demonstrates excellent stability and sturdiness."

"I am impressed with the tool’s latency. Also, the messages in ActiveMQ wait in a queue. The messages will start to move when the system reopens after getting stuck."

"It provides the best support services."

"I'm impressed, I think that Active MQ is great."

"Reliable message delivery and mirroring."

"For reliable messaging, the most valuable feature of ActiveMQ for us is ensuring prompt message delivery."

More ActiveMQ pros

"Very fast for query processing."

"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."

"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."

"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."

"Scalable (Massive) Parallel Processing (MPP) – The ability to bring to bear large amounts of compute against large data sets with Greenplum and the EMC DCA has proven itself to be very effective."

"The product's reliability is the most valuable feature."

"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."

"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."

Cons

"The solution can improve the other protocols to equal the AMQ protocol they offer."

"Distributed message processing would be a nice addition."

"It would be great if it is included as part of the solution, as Kafka is doing. Even though the use case of Kafka is different, If something like data extraction is possible, or if we can experiment with partition tolerance and other such things, that will be great."

"The tool needs to improve its installation part which is lengthy. The product is already working on that aspect so that the complete installation gets completed within a month."

"Needs to focus on a certain facet and be good at it, instead of handling support for most of the available message brokers."

"I would like the tool to improve compliance and stability. We will encounter issues while using the central applications. In the solution's future releases, I want to control and set limitations for databases."

"I would rate the stability a five out of ten because sometimes it gets stuck, and we have to restart it. We"

"Message Management: Better management of the messages. Perhaps persist them, or put in another queue with another life cycle."

More ActiveMQ cons

"If messages pile up until the space of the memory is full, then basically, the cluster goes down, and someone has to log in through the backend and purge all messages."

"Implementation takes a long time."

"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."

"This solution struggled with multi-regional synchronization."

"The product is pretty hard to configure."

"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."

"they need to interact more with customers. They need to explain the features, especially when there are new releases of Greenplum. I know just from information I've found that it has other features, it can be used to for analytics, for integration with Big Data, Hadoop. They need to focus on this part with the customer."

"The user interface could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version, so we have not looked at any pricing."

"We use the open-source version."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions."

"It’s open source, ergo free."

"ActiveMQ is open source, so it is free to use."

"I use open source with standard Apache licensing."

"I think the software is free."

"The solution is less expensive than its competitors."

More ActiveMQ pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"It is an open-source product."

"The pricing is okay."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"This is an open source solution."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveMQ?

For reliable messaging, the most valuable feature of ActiveMQ for us is ensuring prompt message delivery.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveMQ?

Pricing is something to consider with ActiveMQ, though cloud pricing is not costly and depends upon the compute selection. Focusing on AI is essential nowadays. AI capabilities require improvement ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveMQ?

In my current organization, I'm only working with ActiveMQ. I previously worked with IBM WebSphere MQ.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MQ vs ActiveMQ

Compared 53% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs ActiveMQ

Compared 12% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveMQ

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon SQS vs ActiveMQ

Compared 5% of the time

PubSub+ Platform vs ActiveMQ

Compared 4% of the time

More ActiveMQ Competitors

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Essbase Cloud Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveMQ

February 2026

Download ActiveMQ product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

February 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

AMQ

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

Apache

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc.

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

March 2026

Free Report: ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.