IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

ActiveMQ vs Amazon SQS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
12,433 views|8,509 comparisons
Amazon Logo
11,215 views|10,724 comparisons
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"ActiveMQ is very lightweight and quick."

More ActiveMQ Pros →

"The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective."

More Amazon SQS Pros →

Cons
"From the TPS point of view, it's like 100,000 transactions that need to be admitted from different devices and also from the different minor small systems. Those are best fit for Kafka. We have used it on the customer side, and we thought of giving a try to ActiveMQ, but we have to do a lot of performance tests and approval is required before we can use it for this scale."

More ActiveMQ Cons →

"I do not think that this solution is easy to use and the documentation of this solution has a lot of problems and can be improved in the next release. Most of the time, the images in the document are from older versions."

More Amazon SQS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are using the open-source version, so we have not looked at any pricing."
  • More ActiveMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."
  • More Amazon SQS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    610,229 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:ActiveMQ is very lightweight and quick.
    Top Answer:For Kafka, we mainly use it for event sourcing. We have huge concurrent events. From the TPS point of view, it's like 100,000 transactions that need to be admitted from different devices and also from… more »
    Top Answer:We are using ActiveMQ in our customers' companies, so all of the integrations are there. We use this solution for microservices intercommunication.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    12,433
    Comparisons
    8,509
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    11,215
    Comparisons
    10,724
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    247
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AMQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

    Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

    Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

    SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

    Offer
    Learn more about ActiveMQ
    Learn more about Amazon SQS
    Sample Customers
    University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc. 
    EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Transportation Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Media Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    June 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Solace and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: June 2022.
    610,229 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ActiveMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Amazon SQS is ranked 6th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. ActiveMQ is rated 10.0, while Amazon SQS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "Lightweight and quick solution for microservices intercommunication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "An affordable, easy-to-scale solution that is simple to deploy and maintain". ActiveMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ, Anypoint MQ and Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service, whereas Amazon SQS is most compared with Amazon MQ, Apache Kafka, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service, Anypoint MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.