ActiveBatch by Redwood vs CMW Tracker comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and CMW Lab are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #34, while CMW Lab is ranked #42. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to CMW Lab’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CMW Lab users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

1,943 Views
486 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CMW Tracker

Read 15 CMW Tracker reviews

409 Views
176 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

CMW Tracker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2025

CMW Tracker and ActiveBatch by Redwood are competing in the workflow automation category. ActiveBatch has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set that appeals to feature-focused tech buyers despite its higher cost.

Features: CMW Tracker's most valuable features are flexible workflow management, intuitive customization options, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to businesses seeking affordable solutions. ActiveBatch by Redwood shines with its comprehensive automation capabilities, advanced scheduling, and ability to handle complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: CMW Tracker could enhance integration capabilities, expand reporting features, and improve advanced automation tools. ActiveBatch may need to simplify user interface for beginners, streamline initial learning processes, and reduce the complexity of its deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CMW Tracker provides straightforward cloud-based deployment with responsive customer service, minimizing setup complexities. ActiveBatch requires more intensive deployment but offers robust customer service that necessitates training investment.

Pricing and ROI: CMW Tracker offers a lower setup cost and compelling ROI for small to medium businesses, allowing quick benefits with minimal financial burden. ActiveBatch involves a higher initial investment but delivers significant long-term ROI with advanced capabilities, benefitting larger organizations with substantial automation demands.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CMW Tracker Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CMW Tracker

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

34th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (18th), Workload Automation (19th)

CMW Tracker

Ranking in Process Automation

42nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (42nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CMW Tracker is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ActiveBatch by Redwood	0.8%
CMW Tracker	0.4%
Other	98.8%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Sarah Sheluchin

Works

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Approximately ~20 hours of manual effort have been reduced to ~5 hours with the help of ActiveBatch."

"I found ActiveBatch Workload Automation to be a very good scheduling tool. What I like best about it is that it has very less downtime when managing many complex scheduling workflows, so I'm very impressed with ActiveBatch Workload Automation."

"The product offers a centralized platform for managing activities across many environments, applications, etc."

"ActiveBatch helped us automate and schedule routine tasks such as data backups, file transfers, database updates, and report generation, which frees IT staff to focus on other studies."

"Since we are no longer waiting for an operator to see that a job is finished, we have changed our daily cycle from running in eight hours down to about five. We had a third shift-operator retire and that position was never refilled."

"By implementing a sophisticated scheduling mechanism, the system allows for the precise triggering of jobs at user-selected frequencies, enabling a seamless and automated execution of tasks according to specified time intervals."

"We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform regular, repetitive tasks in a more reliable way."

"It has helped with scheduling complex jobs with simple scripts."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."

"Low code development."

"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."

"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."

"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."

"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."

"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."

"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."

More CMW Tracker pros

Cons

"As more organizations are moving towards a cloud-based infrastructure, ActiveBatch could incorporate more capabilities that support popular cloud platforms, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud."

"There are some issues with this version and finding the jobs that it ran. If you're looking at 1,000 different jobs, it shows based on the execution time, not necessarily the run time. So, if there was a constraint waiting, you may be looking for it in the wrong time frame. Plus, with thousands of jobs showing up and the way it pages output jobs, sometimes you end up with multiple pages on the screen, then you have to go through to find the specific job you're looking for. On the opposite side, you can limit the daily activity screen to show only jobs that failed or jobs currently running, which will shrink that back down. However, we have operators who are looking at the whole nightly cycle to make sure everything is there and make sure nothing got blocked or was waiting. Sometimes, they have a hard time finding every item within the list."

"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."

"ActiveBatch UI could use a little more help, and video tutorials would be greatly appreciated for user guides."

"A nice thing to have would be the ability to comfortably pass variables from one job to another. That was one of the things that I found difficult."

"Some improvements can be made to the user interface."

"Except for the GUI, everything looks good."

"They could provide an easier installation guide or technical support to the organizations during the installation process."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."

"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."

"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."

"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."

More CMW Tracker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"The price is so reasonable."

"Great value for the money."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

October 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker

October 2025

Download CMW Tracker product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

Comindware Tracker

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.

CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.

What are the main features of CMW Tracker?

Easy Deployment and Modification: Quickly set up and customize according to user needs.
Browser Accessibility: Access from any location using any web browser.
Low Code Development: Empower users without technical expertise to create workflows.
Team Collaboration Tools: Facilitate seamless communication and collaboration among team members.
Robust Analytics and Reporting: Comprehensive analysis and reporting to track and optimize projects.
Mobile Accessibility: Manage time and tasks efficiently outside the office.

What benefits can users expect from CMW Tracker?

Improved Transparency: Increased visibility into project processes and status.
Standardized Processes: Better alignment and consistency in task management.
Cost-Effective Solution: Affordability without compromising on features and support.
Enhanced Ease of Use: User-friendly design reduces reliance on technical teams.

CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.

CMW Lab

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CMW Tracker

September 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CMW Tracker

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CMW Tracker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CMW Tracker report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.