Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Acunetix Logo

Acunetix Reviews

Vendor: Invicti
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Acunetix?

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Get the Acunetix Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix, SonarQube, Snyk and more!
Acunetix is the #6 ranked solution in top DevSecOps solutions, #9 ranked solution in AST tools, #14 ranked solution in application security solutions, and #25 ranked solution in top Vulnerability Management solutions. PeerSpot users give Acunetix an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Acunetix is most commonly compared to SonarQube: Acunetix vs SonarQube. Acunetix is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Acunetix
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Featured Acunetix reviews

Read more reviews

Acunetix mindshare

Product category:
Application Security Tools
As of December 2025, the mindshare of Acunetix in the Application Security Tools category stands at 2.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Acunetix2.4%
SonarQube19.2%
Checkmarx One10.2%
Other68.2%
Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Acunetix reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Security ToolsDec 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonAcunetix vs SonarQubeDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonAcunetix vs VeracodeDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonAcunetix vs Checkmarx OneDec 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SonarQube4.019.2%83%134 interviewsAdd to research
Snyk4.16.1%100%50 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 28, 2025

Valuable Features

Acunetix offers a web-based interface with scheduling capabilities for efficient testing. Its distinguishing features include Interactive Application Security and Login Sequence Recording. Users appreciate its fast scanning, reporting capabilities, and integration with other systems. Acunetix effectively identifies vulnerabilities while minimizing false positives, providing valuable insights and reports. Its scalability, accuracy, and user-friendly design enhance usability, making it a comprehensive tool for organizations seeking to improve security and conduct penetration testing efficiently.
  • "By helping me patch vulnerabilities, Acunetix has led to measurable outcomes like time saved and fewer incidents."
  • "Since implementing Acunetix, I have seen improvements as we have discovered real vulnerabilities and threats on our web application server, which is very critical to our organization."
  • "If an organization has 100 plus applications and wants to use an automated scanner, they should definitely go ahead with Acunetix because it is very cost-effective and will save time compared to focusing on other solutions and performing manual security assessments."

Room for Improvement

Acunetix would benefit from enhancements to its Interactive Application Security Testing module, database updates, more advanced manual replication tools, and reduced false positives. It should improve scanning speed, customization, and report simplification. The pricing model and licensing flexibility are concerns for users, who also desire better integration with other platforms, expanded mobile app compatibility, and subdomain scanning capabilities. Customer support and the handling of false positives need attention, while bandwidth consumption and target limits could be optimized.
  • "I think Acunetix needs improvement since it is now working with Invicti, so the price list will need to be reconsidered."
  • "Acunetix may need to reconsider the cost or price compared to other vendors."
  • "Improving the handling of false positives would be beneficial because it can be challenging to trust the findings flagged by Acunetix, and those findings must be manually validated."

ROI

Many organizations report positive ROI from Acunetix. It enhances security processes, identifies vulnerabilities, and saves time. Its automation reduces reliance on manual testers, although a combination of both methods is necessary. Acunetix's use in maintaining security at application releases is highly valued, and its distributed cost is effective in minimizing risks. Users appreciate improved security posture and cost savings through reduced effort for bulk application scanning and threat identification on web servers.

Pricing

Enterprise users have mixed experiences with Acunetix pricing. While some initially found it cost-effective, recent increases and complex licensing models have made it expensive compared to competitors. The annual subscription cost varies, influenced by the number of domains or subdomains. Some users report that additional costs arise for specific needs, like technical support. Discounts and special licensing models for certain companies are available, but clarity on pricing details is needed.
  • "The price is exceptionally high."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

Popular Use Cases

Acunetix is primarily used for dynamic application security testing and web vulnerability scanning. Many organizations, including global publishers and FinTech companies, employ it for penetration testing, code assessments, and compliance with standards like PCI DSS. It is integrated into existing security measures to detect issues like SQL injections and cross-site scripting. Many users, such as consultants and IT managers, depend on its automated approach for efficient security evaluations across various applications globally.

Service and Support

Acunetix's customer service and support are generally responsive and helpful, though there are mixed experiences. Many find the technical support efficient, with good response times and effective assistance. Some users report needing to use resellers for better service. While some appreciate the active and fast support from their team in Malta, others find response times slow. Communication issues and backlogs can lead to delays in addressing inquiries. Satisfaction levels vary, ranging from high to moderate.

Deployment

Many found Acunetix's initial setup straightforward and quick, often requiring less than an hour. Some mentioned challenges with upgrades and on-premise deployment, citing a need for improved automation and compatibility with non-Windows systems. Support and documentation were praised, yet some desired a more guided installation process through a wizard. While some faced issues with complex environments, the overall sentiment indicated ease of installation for those familiar with the process.

Scalability

Acunetix demonstrates strong scalability. Users find it adaptable to different environments with ease, accommodating an expanding number of applications and users. While some note it handles larger workloads well, others emphasize it requires proper licensing for optimal performance. Many appreciate its flexibility and effectiveness in supporting expanding IT infrastructures. The cloud version is noted for providing better scalability than the desktop version, making it suitable for various organizations’ needs.

Stability

Acunetix demonstrates excellent stability with no service drops or critical issues. Users note consistent performance, reliable scans, and minimal false positives or negatives. Few have assigned maintenance tasks and described the process as straightforward. While issues have occurred during updates, including compatibility problems with certain applications, users report effective technical support for resolution. Stability ratings are high, with few reports of bugs or glitches. Users consider it a reliable tool in their experience.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Acunetix Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business198
Midsize Enterprise135
Large Enterprise431
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
8%
Government
7%
Retailer
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Media Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Construction Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Training & Coaching Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Acunetix with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Acunetix

Acunetix was previously known as AcuSensor.

Acunetix customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Related questions

  • 128
If you had to both encrypt and compress data during transmission, which would you do first and why?
  • 37
When evaluating Application Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 92
What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?
  • 119
What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
  • 42
We're evaluating Tripwire, what else should we consider?
  • 30
Which application security solutions include both vulnerability scans and quality checks?
  • 409
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
  • 29
Why Do I Need Application Security Software?
  • 71
Which Email Security enterprise solution would you choose: Cisco Secure Email vs Forcepoint Email Security vs Barracuda Email Security Gateway?
  • 38
SAST vs. DAST: Which is better for application security testing?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Security Tools
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Vulnerability Management
DevSecOps

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
SonarQube vs Acunetix Logo
SonarQube vs Acunetix
Snyk vs Acunetix Logo
Snyk vs Acunetix
GitLab vs Acunetix Logo
GitLab vs Acunetix
Checkmarx One vs Acunetix Logo
Checkmarx One vs Acunetix
Veracode vs Acunetix Logo
Veracode vs Acunetix
Qualys VMDR vs Acunetix Logo
Qualys VMDR vs Acunetix
Tenable Nessus vs Acunetix Logo
Tenable Nessus vs Acunetix
Coverity Static vs Acunetix Logo
Coverity Static vs Acunetix
JFrog Xray vs Acunetix Logo
JFrog Xray vs Acunetix
Tenable Security Center vs Acunetix Logo
Tenable Security Center vs Acunetix
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Acunetix Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Acunetix
OWASP Zap vs Acunetix Logo
OWASP Zap vs Acunetix
OpenText Core Application Security vs Acunetix Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Acunetix
Mend.io vs Acunetix Logo
Mend.io vs Acunetix
Sonatype Lifecycle vs Acunetix Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle vs Acunetix
See all alternatives
 
Acunetix Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees3.5I've used Acunetix for over five years to scan web applications efficiently, appreciating its detailed reports and centralized dashboard, though support and duplicate findings need improvement; overall, it saves time and supports compliance effectively.
Lead Cybersecurity at TBO3.5I've used Acunetix primarily for application security and found it effective and affordable, though false positives remain a concern. It's reliable, scalable, and saves time over manual assessments, especially with authenticated and continuous scanning features.
CEO at Xcelliti4.5I use Acunetix primarily for penetration and security testing, benefiting from its efficient vulnerability detection, minimal false positives, and excellent integration capabilities. Improvements needed include reducing false positives and enhancing integration with newer tools like GitHub.
Cybersecurity Team Leader at EMAK For Integrated Solutions5.0I've used Acunetix for four years to scan web vulnerabilities accurately, helping us patch issues quickly. It's stable, scalable, easy to set up, and integrates well, though pricing may need reconsideration after its integration with Invicti.
Cybersecurity Team Leader at EMAK For Integrated Solutions5.0I've used Acunetix for three years to scan web vulnerabilities, and its accuracy and scalability have greatly benefited my organization, though the cost is high; overall, it's reliable and effective, making it worth the investment.
Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem4.5I use Acunetix primarily for penetration testing and find it comprehensive for web applications, supporting manual interventions and specific scenarios like CAPTCHA. It saves us time by covering attack surfaces, though I’ve encountered some update issues.
Head of Operations, Supply Chain at Lyreco Deutschland GmbH3.0Acunetix is user-friendly and beneficial for security engineers, enabling quick learning and effective application scanning and report generation. However, the deployment process needs improvement, particularly in creating proxy connections, and it's better suited for smaller companies compared to competitors.
Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World3.5I use Acunetix primarily to identify client vulnerabilities. Its best feature is its ability to identify vulnerabilities effectively, though there are some notable false positives. Improvements in partnering are needed, but it has enhanced our security posture.