Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Testim?

Get the report
Helped 867,299 peers since 2012

Featured Testim reviews

Testim mindshare

Product category:
As of September 2025, the mindshare of Testim in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 3.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Testim3.4%
Tricentis Tosca18.5%
BrowserStack10.2%
Other67.9%
Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Testim reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsSep 13, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonTestim vs Tricentis ToscaSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonTestim vs OpenText Functional TestingSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonTestim vs UiPath Test CloudSep 13, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.118.5%96%112 interviewsAdd to research
Katalon Studio3.9N/A89%47 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business155
Midsize Enterprise88
Large Enterprise327
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Retailer
5%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Construction Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Government
4%
Media Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
University
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Engineering Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
 
Testim Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees4.5I lead quality engineering, requiring extensive application testing. Manual methods were cumbersome, prompting a shift to automation. Testim's smart locator eased script development and maintenance, though faster scripting and enhanced API features would improve test suite creation.
Senior Consultant at Eviden France4.5I use Testim for automating testing scripts in a corporate bank's product development. Its record and playback feature allows easy automation without extensive coding. Unlike Selenium, Testim simplifies the process, making it ideal for beginners. No improvements are needed.
Director at Xceedance4.5Our company uses Testim as a policy administrator system for insurance, specifically to automate test cases for customer implementations. It efficiently runs and stores multiple test cases, though improvements are needed in documentation and scalability. We deploy via Microsoft Azure.
Senior Test Analyst at Colgate5.0No summary available
Director Test Services at a tech services company with 201-500 employees5.0No summary available
Associate Director, UX at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.5We use Testim for application and integration testing, finding it easy to use with valuable features like session recording and visual error notifications. While it boosts productivity and justifies its cost, branch management and some system notifications could improve.
System Analyst - Quality Assurance at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5We use Testim for test cases, and its most valuable feature is the recently added AI functionality. However, it occasionally suffers from stability issues, particularly after running multiple tests, affecting its consistency and reliability. We haven't considered other solutions.
Test Lead at Mpart3.5We use Testim for automation testing to manage Java scripts efficiently. Its simplicity in recording and playback is valuable. However, improvements are needed in pricing, visual testing, and PDF handling, requiring third-party tools for screenshots and PDF validation.