Testim vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Testim and Worksoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Testim is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7, while Worksoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8. Testim holds a 5.6% mindshare in TAt, compared to Worksoft’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Testim users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,950 Views
633 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 67 Worksoft Certify reviews

3,227 Views
220 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Testim

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Testim are competing products in the automated testing market. While Worksoft Certify excels in comprehensive test coverage, Testim shines in agility and rapid execution.

Features: Worksoft Certify is known for its extensive test coverage, ideal for complex enterprise applications. It offers advanced integration capabilities, especially with SAP, and allows for lights-out testing, enabling tests to run overnight without intervention. The automation process is highly modular, allowing reusability of scripts, and it integrates seamlessly with various interfaces, including web and SAP applications. Testim provides advanced AI-driven capabilities that streamline test creation and maintenance. Its record and playback feature simplifies automation without needing extensive coding knowledge, and the tool is designed to adapt quickly to changes, enhancing its flexibility for agile teams.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify could improve in terms of user interface simplicity to further reduce the learning curve for non-developers. Enhancements in AI capabilities could aid in smarter test script maintenance. Expanding integration capabilities with more contemporary software beyond SAP would add value. Testim could enhance support for complex enterprise-level applications, provide more robust documentation options, and improve integration with a broader range of third-party tools to widen its use case scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify's deployment is often customized for enterprise environments, offering robust support during setup. Its versatility and strong customer service make it a solid choice for large enterprises. Testim's cloud-based approach simplifies deployment, allowing quicker adoption with minimal infrastructure requirements. The model is flexible and agile, aligning well with teams focused on rapid development cycles, complemented by strong support tailored towards agile methodologies.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify usually involves a higher initial setup cost, which can be justified by its extensive features for large-scale deployments, delivering a higher long-term ROI for enterprises. Testim presents a more cost-effective setup, attractive for small to medium-sized businesses due to a faster ROI through lower initial investments. This makes Testim appealing for cost-conscious teams seeking swift benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Testim vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. Worksoft Certify

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Testim is 5.6%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 4.2%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Dheeraj Bavirisetty

Senior Consultant at Eviden France

Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code

We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…

Read full review

Shailesh-Parkhe

Manager-Projects at Cognizant

Powerful automation tool with a user-friendly interface, codeless automation, and adaptability to complex business processes, particularly in SAP environments

The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers. Even during the initial learning phase, I found it remarkably user-friendly. It facilitates quick onboarding and training of new resources. It offers features for building automation scripts, such as search and certify capture. A notable advantage is that it doesn't rely on other tools like Micro Focus UFT or Micro Focus ALM for script execution. Worksoft can run independently without the need for support from Microsoft Office, although the option to use it for maintaining data exists. The tool also includes debugging features and comprehensive reporting capabilities, generating PDF reports for easy analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

More Testim pros

"The most valuable features of Worksoft Certify are the way we can maintain the processes and sub-processes inside. We can immediately identify and replicate multiple objects in the application without having a major issue with it. We are able to do a lot of operations even with the solution being completely scriptless. That is a large advantage compared with other automation tools."

"Certify's web UI testing abilities for testing of modern applications like SAP Fiori was good when we started and they developed it to be even better. We all know that web applications can change objects in DOM quite fast and it breaks tests. To counter it Certify has made object recognition more flexible and generic, so we don't have any troubles."

"People who don't have coding knowledge are capable of doing automation with Certify. It reduces coding and scripting dependencies."

"We are now trying to automate all our applications: SAP, web, third-party, and legacy. Instead of multiple tools, we have been able to have Worksoft handle a lot of our applications. This has saved us a lot of time and effort."

"Provides all the in-built functionalities and is a wonderful tool."

"People focus on what they actually want to test and define it in a more detailed way. It shines a light on what they are testing, along with the speed and adaptability."

"If we write a new test that's 80 percent the same as an existing test, it is pretty straightforward to reuse the steps from existing tests for our new tests and build upon them."

"It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

More Testim cons

"There are some other more complete tools than Worksoft Certify, such as Tricentis Tosca. It has a quicker way of taking in a customer's feedback with more efficiency. I do not see Worksoft Certify having a lot of progress over the years that we have used the tool in this area."

"Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming."

"It would be great if our business testers could develop their own automated test cases. With every release you do, you have to go back and touch your old test cases and bring them up to speed, or develop new test cases. In the beginning, that is a challenge because you have to have someone who is certified in the tool to help you develop these test cases."

"We ran into some issues with the version that we were on during the initial setup. We ran into a bug on one version, then they upgraded us to a new version, and we got hit with another bug. So, they had to put us in a beta. That was a little frustrating. However, besides the bugs that we ran into, the install was pretty straightforward."

"One feature that we have been asking for has been to treat tests as code and store the source code for tests in a configuration management tool. Right now, for version control of testing, it's all internally within the tool. If we have a test of a business process and want to revive that test, our methodology now is purely manual work. We go into the tool, create a copy of the existing test, and call the next one: v2. Now, we have two of them and the only way you can tell them apart is by its naming convention."

"The product had some UI issues."

"In the past, when we've tried to automate some of our web apps, it has not been as robust. If there were one thing that could be improved, it's interaction with web applications. The issue we were running into is that it was harder to identify the objects than it is with some of the other architectured applications."

"When it comes to mobile testing, we have a small bottleneck there. You have to buy third-party separate licenses if you want to test on a mobile. Business wise we see room for improvement there, although it's that really critical for us."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."

"On our last big SAP implementation project, we inserted an automation resource into the beginning of the project. Between automating regression processes, data staging, and using our automation to help repair cutover and conversion issues. We saved the project about $1,700,000."

"I think they came out with a different type of licensing specifically for testing. Therefore, you don't have to use a more expensive user license, you can use an automation license. So potentially, if we had 100 use cases, we could spin up a 100 different machines, have them all run and be done in five minutes. That would be the goal, but I don't know if that would actually succeed or not."

"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance."

"We have seen that the initial Worksoft implementation has helped our customers reduce their testing cycle time by 50 percent. With further continuous improvement, we have seen cycle time reduced up to 75 percent. That is the level of productivity achieved using Worksoft Certify."

"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do."

"I can only judge based on the situation that we had around six years ago when we did the tool evaluation. Worksoft was not the cheapest, but it provided the value. For 25 concurrent licenses, we paid more than €400,000, so it was not cheap. In the end, if you see how much time you are saving and compare it with others, its price is okay. We had also compared its cost with the licensing costs for HP and Tricentis, and they were at another level. Now, as we have already booked the licenses, we only have to pay an annual maintenance fee, which is 70%, and that is okay."

"We save probably 50 percent of our time. The tool does what it's supposed to do, and we are able to actually work."

"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

17%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

The tool is worth the money.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 45% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 14% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 7% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 68% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 2% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Testim

May 2025

Download Testim product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

May 2025

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Overview

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Worksoft Certify is the industry's first codeless automated testing system, created for non-technical people to test end-to-end business processes at an enterprise scale.

It was designed to test complicated processes spanning numerous apps and integrating into contemporary DevOps tool chains. Worksoft Certify manages dynamic input, process flows, and frequent variances in business processes with ease.

Worksoft Certify automates the testing of your exact business processes across all of your enterprise applications. This solution makes it simple for customers and suppliers to package a process with all of its related dependencies, sub-processes, record sets, record filters, layouts, and variables.

Worksoft Certify automates tests as effortlessly and quickly as the underlying applications permit, allowing you to evaluate business processes in record time with flawless dependability and consistency. Worksoft Certify speeds up test automation by utilizing a patented Object Action Framework, which effectively models the application under test as a set of pages containing GUI objects and test steps that perform actions on those objects.

Worksoft Certify Features

Worksoft Certify has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

LiveTouch: Without coding, graphically edit and update tests.

No "fail" tests: See fail validations flagged when the end-to-end test continues.

Process comparison: Visually compare tests side by side and eliminate unnecessary tests to reduce maintenance

Magic search: AI-driven process search can find duplicate processes and keep automation libraries clean.

Exploratory testing: Real-time automated exploratory tests.

API testing: Utilize the virtual services and current SoapUI tests.

Test data generator: Obtain data from SAP for testing.

Create content: Make use of the more than 300 prebuilt SAP end-to-end testing scenarios.

Visual capture: Support agile testing by using automation artifacts from process discovery.

Full compatibility: Web, Java, .Net, client/server applications, SAP GUI, FIORI, web portal Workday, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Ariba, SuccessFactors, Hybris, AJAX, and more.

Worksoft Certify Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Worksoft Certify. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Speed: Automate at least 80% of testing to accelerate innovation.

Savings: Reduce overall testing and maintenance expenditures by 60% to 80%.

Confidence: Identify defects faster and reduce production defects by 60%.

DevOps-ready: Run tests as part of continuous integration, testing, or delivery cycle.

Support for RPA: Convert test scripts into robotic process automation.

Reviews from Real Users

Jens N., Enterprise Architect SAP Solutions at a computer software company, writes, “As compared to other tools for test automation, what is very good in this tool is the ability to implement logic into the scripts without coding and learning a complex script language. It is comparable to defining formulas in Excel. It is pretty easy to learn how to make your scripts more intelligent and more flexible as per the situation.”

Aditya C., Sr Test Automation Architect at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features of Worksoft Certify are the way we can maintain the processes and sub-processes inside. We can immediately identify and replicate multiple objects in the application without having a major issue with it.”

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. Worksoft Certify

May 2025

Free Report: Testim vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Testim vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Testim vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.