Eggplant Test vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

4,532 Views
3,762 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Eggplant Test and Testim both compete in the test automation tools market. Eggplant Test leads in pricing and support, while Testim excels with its feature set, especially in continuous integration workflows.

Features: Eggplant Test offers AI-driven tools for end-to-end testing, including image and OCR technology. It is adaptable for complex enterprise environments. Testim stands out with machine learning enhancements for test stability, smart locators to reduce maintenance, and record-playback features that minimize coding needs.

Room for Improvement: Eggplant Test could improve speed and flexibility for faster integration workflows and enhance AI adaptability. Testim may benefit from more personalized customer service, refined cloud capabilities, and reduced initial setup complexities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Eggplant Test provides a straightforward deployment process and personal customer service, ensuring smooth integration. Testim offers quick deployment through a cloud-based model, emphasizing scalability and rapid adjustments.

Pricing and ROI: Eggplant Test is cost-effective, offering good short-term ROI with competitive pricing. Testim is priced higher but delivers substantial long-term ROI through reduced maintenance and efficient features, making it a preferred investment for larger-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Testim Report (Updated: September 2026).

Download the complete report

Eggplant Test vs. Testim

September 2026

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (12th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (16th)

Testim

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 2.9%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.5%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Testim	2.5%
Eggplant Test	2.9%
Other	94.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Eggplant Test is that it's very easy to use; you just capture those pictures of the objects in your application and it's easy to automate."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"It has definitely improved the quality of our software."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"It is easy to set up."

More Eggplant Test pros

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The product is easy to use."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

More Testim pros

Cons

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"The solution is very heavy, so sometimes my laptop, when I use it, stops and I have to link with it again."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"If somebody asks me, "Is it possible, from the first moment, that somebody who has never used Eggplant can create actions?" I must answer, "No, it is not possible.""

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

More Eggplant Test cons

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind, for instance - instead of going in and out of the editor every time I want to view test data for a test, I could just view the test data in the table, or the ability to copy steps through tests."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

What is your primary use case for Testim?

As a Quality Engineering leader, I'm responsible for testing our 20-25 applications. Manual testing is becoming increasingly challenging due to their growing scope and complexity. We've been automa...

What advice do you have for others considering Testim?

Before diving into this tool, it's highly recommended to have a basic understanding of Selenium and JavaScript. The company provides excellent training courses for free, and I strongly suggest comp...

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Download Eggplant Test product report

Eggplant Test

November 2026

Download Testim product report

October 2026

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.

Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.

What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?

OCR and Image Recognition: Facilitates efficient bug detection and automated testing.
AI Capabilities: Enhances testing efficiency with intelligent automation.
Cross-Platform Operation: Compatible with various operating systems.
Integration Options: Connects easily with GitHub and other platforms.
Scriptless Testing: Simplifies testing for users with limited coding skills.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Testing Time: Achieves faster testing cycles through automation.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances reliability with refined testing methods.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and operation for users.
Robust Reporting: Offers comprehensive insights into test outcomes.

Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.

Keysight Technologies

Testim offers a comprehensive automation testing toolkit with features like smart locators and AI functionality. It supports developers and QA teams in managing testing across environments efficiently, even with UI changes.

Testim is designed for automation testing with robust features such as record and playback capabilities, a smart locator system, and a reliable algorithm to maintain stability during UI modifications. Its pre-defined tests, customizable JS testing, and accessibility features improve usability. Organizations benefit from its REST API, CLI, and shared steps, alongside AI advancements that simplify test storage and accelerate delivery times. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in pricing, visual testing, and element selection tools, with calls for enhanced mobile app support and better report features. Multiple test runs may cause stability issues, leaving room for enhanced API integrations and more detailed documentation.

What are Testim's most important features?

Record and Playback: Simplifies test creation with easy-to-use recording tools
Smart Locator: Maintains test accuracy despite UI changes
Accessible Pre-defined Tests: Offers templates for quicker setup
AI Functionality: Enhances test case management and delivery
REST API and CLI: Facilitates integration into development workflows

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Speeds up testing processes and script automation
Usability: Intuitive interface supports both technical and non-technical users
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse web platforms and applications
Collaboration: Enhances teamwork by sharing steps across projects

Industries primarily employ Testim for automating business end-to-end tests, integrating it within complicated applications. It serves both developers and QA teams by supporting web app testing, API calls, accessibility checks, and JavaScript-focused test data. This low-code platform suits team members with varying technical expertise, adding efficiency to QA and development processes.

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality