Eggplant Test vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,803 Views
2,719 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Eggplant Test and Testim compete in test automation, with Testim gaining an edge through AI-driven features that enhance test accuracy.

Features: Eggplant Test is known for scriptless automation, cross-platform testing, and integration with CI/CD tools, benefiting businesses needing versatile integration. Testim features AI-powered test creation and maintenance, improving speed and accuracy, appealing to those needing advanced automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Eggplant Test could enhance its AI functionalities and automation scope for complex scenarios while improving user interface intuitiveness. Testim could benefit from expanding its scriptless testing options and enhancing its integration with non-web platforms to broaden its applicability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Eggplant Test offers intuitive deployment and dedicated support for varying expertise levels, whereas Testim's AI-guided setup simplifies onboarding and its robust support gives it a slight advantage for businesses adopting new technologies.

Pricing and ROI: Eggplant Test offers a straightforward pricing structure and favorable ROI due to versatile applications. Testim may have higher upfront costs but offers enhanced ROI through reduced maintenance and advanced automation. It appeals to those investing in cutting-edge technologies.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Testim Report (Updated: September 2025).

Download the complete report

Eggplant Test vs. Testim

September 2025

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)

Testim

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.0%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 5.8%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Testim	5.8%
Eggplant Test	4.0%
Other	90.2%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Dheeraj Bavirisetty

Senior Consultant at Eviden France

Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code

We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

More Eggplant Test pros

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The product is easy to use."

More Testim pros

Cons

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"The solution would crash from time to time."

More Eggplant Test cons

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 13% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 39% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 15% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 7% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Download Eggplant Test product report

Eggplant Test

October 2025

Download Testim product report

October 2025

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality