OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Testim are leading software testing solutions. Testim is favored for its advanced feature set, while OpenText stands out for its competitive pricing and robust support.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers integrates seamlessly with developer tools, offering robust scripting and extensive integrations for detailed automation. It supports various languages, enhancing developer productivity. Testim is known for AI-driven test automation, simplifying complex scenario automation with its smart locators and record-playback functionality, making it user-friendly and efficient for rapid testing.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its user interface and ease of use, as navigating complex frameworks can be challenging. Increasing AI capabilities and simplifying setup processes would also boost its appeal. Testim might benefit from reduced costs and enhanced customization options, addressing diverse organizational requirements. Expanding integrations and offering offline capabilities could further strengthen its competitive edge.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers versatile deployment models coupled with strong customer support, ensuring a smooth implementation process. Testim emphasizes a cloud-based deployment that is simple and scalable, complemented by efficient support channels. Testim's cloud focus appeals to organizations prioritizing fast and straightforward deployment.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is more budget-friendly, offering substantial upfront value, especially suitable for organizations with constrained testing resources. Testim, despite higher costs, delivers a significant ROI with its advanced features, aligning with businesses seeking superior scalability and test coverage. The investment in Testim is justified by its automation efficiency and effectiveness.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
