OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Testim comparison

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,975 Views
1,725 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Testim specialize in facilitating automated testing for developers. Testim is favored for usability, offering simplicity and ease of use, while OpenText is recognized for integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers provides robust integration with various development environments, a comprehensive suite for test management, and strong support for DevOps practices. Testim delivers AI-driven test automation, smart locator features for building stable test scripts, and a user-friendly recording capability that minimizes coding requirements.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers could enhance support for newer programming languages, improve cloud compatibility, and reduce setup complexity. Testim can improve by offering more integration options, enhancing test result analytics, and expanding support for legacy systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a traditional deployment model requiring extensive customization but provides in-depth customer support appealing to enterprises. Testim features a quick, cloud-based deployment with minimal infrastructure needs and streamlined support that caters to agile teams.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers involves higher setup costs, justified by its comprehensive feature set and deep integration within existing systems, potentially leading to better long-term ROI for established enterprises. Testim provides more competitive pricing with quicker returns due to its low-overhead deployment and faster adoption, making it appealing for startups and tech-driven SMEs.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs. Testim Report (Updated: March 2026).

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs. Testim

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.8%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers	3.1%
Testim	2.8%
Other	94.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Eitan Gold

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

User-friendly integration with support for Visual Studio enhances GUI testing capabilities

OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio. The support is excellent. It is easy to implement tests with OpenText UFT Developer. We primarily use it for GUI testing and testing web applications with another application. This is the main usage for us. We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework, and they work well together.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf."

"Integrates well with other products."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT Developer is the flexibility to work with many different types of software."

"In our case, because we’re in the insurance industry, we have technologies from 20 years old to brand new, and that’s one reason that LeanFT is so great -- because it can support all those technologies, even the older ones."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working."

"The solution helps to accelerate software testing automation. It will help to reduce lead time and increase productivity and efficiency."

"The fact that it is so easy to go between UFT with its large install base and LeanFT, whoever has used UFT will quite easily become productive with LeanFT, but with the added benefit of shifting left to move testing closer to the development cycle."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pros

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The product is easy to use."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

More Testim pros

Cons

"It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute."

"The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio in Micro Focus UFT Developer is currently limited. At present, only Visual Studio 2019 is supported, despite the release of a newer version (2022). Similarly, the tool only supports up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8, while there have been six newer versions released. This is an area that could be improved upon, particularly in the Windows environment."

"It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support."

"Stability depends on the company's infrastructure and end-to-end infrastructure. When I used the tool in my project, we had a big problem with many users using it simultaneously."

"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers cons

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers pricing and cost advice

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

As of now, we don't have integration in the CI/CD pipeline, but they are supporting that as well. When your machine is in a locked state, you can even execute the Windows application automation. Mi...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

For functional testing, we are using OpenText Functional Testing for Developers as our product for testing. I am using the cross-browser testing capabilities of OpenText Functional Testing for Deve...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 5% of the time

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

Wikidi Testomato vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing for Developers Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 16% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 12% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 8% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Testim

Compared 2% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers

March 2026

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers report

Download OpenText Functional Testing for Developers product report

Download Testim product report

February 2026

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.

This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?

Complex Algorithm Handling: Manages complex scenarios with ease, including fuzzy logic.
Developer-friendly: Enables coding in C# and Java, integrating seamlessly with popular IDEs.
AI-based Object Recognition: Enhances test automation through advanced object identification.
Extensive Protocol Support: Supports a wide range of protocols for diverse testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Connects effortlessly with ALM and Jenkins, promoting continuous development.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Functional Testing?

Efficient Test Automation: Streamlines test processes, optimizing resource allocation and reducing effort.
Multi-platform Flexibility: Facilitates cross-platform testing, accommodating desktop, web, and banking applications.
Reduced IT Workload: Simplifies automation tasks, decreasing the strain on IT resources.
Enhanced DevOps Support: Integrates well with DevOps practices for continuous testing advancements.

Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.

OpenText

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality