Palo Alto Networks Panorama Reviews

Palo Alto Networks Panorama reduced response time significantly, from four hours to about five minutes with URL filtering, boosting staff productivity based on usage. It's seen as worthwhile, quickly delivering returns within months for larger networks with more than ten firewalls by saving time and providing a consolidated view. While some users experienced financial constraints, efficiency in managing multiple firewalls improved, allowing better use of human resources without needing additional experts.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama is considered costly compared to competitors, with high setup and licensing fees. Many find its pricing justified by superior performance and comprehensive features, especially when additional functions like intrusion detection and VPN are enabled. Some users prefer its flexibility and annual licensing options, with potential discounts for bulk purchases. The cost may vary based on deployment type, with virtual solutions being more affordable. The pricing is deemed high, but value-driven organizations appreciate its reliability and scalability.

• "Palo Alto is costly compared to Fortinet and Sophos."
• "It is very affordable when compared to more expensive firewalls."
• "Palo Alto products are generally priced higher compared to their competitors."

Palo Alto Networks Panorama is used for centralized management of multiple firewalls across various locations. Organizations implement it to streamline security management, enabling consistent configuration and policy deployment. With a single interface, they monitor, manage, and log firewall activities, enhancing network security. Panorama simplifies the management of firewalls, aids with automation, and provides a comprehensive security profile, making it crucial for managing complex network infrastructures in both on-premises and cloud environments.

Customer service and support for Palo Alto Networks Panorama are mostly considered good, with users noting responsive, knowledgeable staff and an efficient response to critical issues. Some encounter delays in response time, particularly when using partner support or dealing with complex problems. Users rate the technical support high, appreciating account managers and the overall expertise of the team, though a few suggest improvements in response speed and first-level support efficiency.

Initial setup of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is generally straightforward and not overly complex. Deployment duration varies based on environment complexity, ranging from a few hours for simple scenarios to weeks for complex ones. Some find scripting and using a consultant helpful, while others rely on internal teams. Initial stages might be challenging, but subsequent management becomes easier. Documentation and support from Palo Alto assist in overcoming any setup hurdles.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama is praised for its strong scalability and is highly effective across various network environments. It's utilized by organizations of diverse sizes, supporting thousands of users and hundreds of devices efficiently. Licensing is a consideration, and while some find it costly, Panorama offers substantial scalability potential. It can be seamlessly integrated across multiple locations and expanded as needed, often rated highly for its ease in scaling infrastructure and device management.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama exhibits impressive stability, with users consistently reporting reliable performance and no major issues like crashes or glitches. Regular updates maintain its robustness, although some experience occasional delays in pushing configurations. Successful deployments on AWS and good support feedback enhance user confidence. The platform supports large user bases effectively, suggesting stability in high-demand environments. Generally, feedback rates Panorama’s stability from eight to ten out of ten, highlighting its dependability.