We performed a comparison between Opinnate and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management."Version upgrades can be done quickly."
"The platform is easy to deploy and maintain."
"All of the reports and events from different locations can be managed centrally."
"One valuable feature is centralized management. We are able to manage it centrally for two to three remote offices, our head office and our data centers. So, it is very simple to manage."
"Variable creation and template stack functionalities make Palo Alto Networks Panorama a brilliant solution. It is a completely scalable system, with good technical support."
"This solution is user-friendly. It is centrally managed and provides role optimization, without the need for additional tools."
"It's easy to deploy any software or policies."
"This is an efficient solution."
"In Panorama, installing the policy, and pushing the policy, it's quite seamless."
"The entire ease of use is most valuable. If you're managing firewalls locally with PAN-OS, the look and feel of Panorama is the same. So, you don't have to relearn another product. If you're used to managing firewalls from Palo Alto, you can easily use Panorama to manage them. It looks and feels the same."
"The product's web page view is very basic. They could add new features to it."
"PDF format is not available for Alert Composer."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"Its UI and usability could be improved. The way the UI looks could be improved to make it a little bit more intuitive. Other than that, it is a pretty simple product."
"We had some challenges with the initial setup, but it was more on a learning curve basis."
"It is an expensive product."
"Panorama needs to work on its configuration issues."
"Storage in Palo Alto Networks Panorama needs improvement. My company also experienced deployment issues when the product was first installed, particularly when binding with the firewall. It's not as user-friendly because not everyone can deploy it without some knowledge."
"Instead of searching their knowledge base in their website, maybe they can interact with us in the user interface to explain things better."
"It's difficult to implement."
Opinnate is ranked 12th in Firewall Security Management with 2 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 80 reviews. Opinnate is rated 10.0, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Opinnate writes "Good support, nice interface, and simple to upgrade". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". Opinnate is most compared with Tufin Orchestration Suite, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite and FireMon Security Manager.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
