Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and Palo Alto Networks Panorama are leading solutions in the network management and security sector. Based on user feedback, FortiGate Cloud seems to have the upper hand in terms of ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, while Panorama excels in centralized management capabilities.
Features: FortiGate Cloud is praised for its ease of use, stability, and integration with various Fortinet tools, making it particularly effective for diverse environments such as remote offices. It offers flexibility across public, private, and hybrid cloud setups. Conversely, Panorama stands out with its strong application ID capabilities, centralized management that simplifies handling multiple firewalls, and customizable templates that are beneficial for large deployments. Its advanced threat prevention features are also highly regarded.
Room for Improvement: FortiGate Cloud users highlight the need for better integration with other technologies, improved reporting capabilities, and a longer data retention span. There are also mentions of high costs and a lack of advanced monitoring features, along with suggestions for enhancements in the user interface and potential SIEM bundling. Panorama is noted to require pricing adjustments, improvements in integration and UI, reduction in the number of updates, and better automation processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiGate Cloud's deployment is straightforward and flexible across various environments, with technical support typically responsive and available in multiple regions, despite some concerns about wait times and language support. Panorama, while reliable, is complex to deploy initially but benefits from strong customer service amidst its longer update cycles.
Pricing and ROI: FortiGate Cloud is considered cost-effective with its competitive pricing, offering strong ROI through cost savings and operational efficiency. In contrast, Panorama is on the higher end of the pricing spectrum, but its comprehensive feature set and robust performance often justify the cost, although a price reduction could improve its competitiveness.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has improved our clients' cost savings and efficiency.
The cloud aspect provides flexibility in disaster recovery and cost management.
In terms of cost savings or efficiency in our company's IT network management, I would say that the tool is very efficient because we have no problems with it at all.
I have received good support from FortiGate, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
Technically, the support team is good, and they have very good relations with users and even partners.
The team is responsive, and most cases are handled promptly.
The technical support from Palo Alto is rated around nine out of ten.
The tech support I've encountered has been good, prompt, and fast.
It depends on the case, with room for improvement in both quality and response time.
We plan to deploy VoIP in the future and aim to leverage more VoIP capabilities for our remote operations.
I rate the product's scalability a ten out of ten.
It's very easy to add new devices and push the configuration templates.
Scalability is primarily enhanced by Strata Cloud Manager as it is much easier to scale in the cloud than in an on-premises installation.
Scalability depends on whether it's a hardware or virtual machine model.
We weren't bothered even by a single incident for the past three years.
But in three or four years, I only had problems logging in three times.
It is a very stable solution.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is very stable.
There's a need to improve or invest more in an application that can follow users wherever they go.
The Linux version currently lacks some of the latest features, notably in the IPv6 tool stack, which is available for Windows clients.
It would be advantageous if it were more cost-effective.
In terms of operation, it is quite important that the staff managing the Panorama should be technically sound enough, and they should know exactly what they are doing.
The AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud.
There is room for improvement in the graphical user interface (GUI), which is becoming outdated, especially the NAT section.
On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Fortinet FortiGate Cloud's pricing an eight out of ten.
There are no additional costs.
Therefore, the cost-benefit is quite significant.
Virtual Panorama is well-priced and is sold every time there's a solution.
Commercially, compared to Fortinet, Palo Alto is more expensive.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is expensive but provides good value for money.
The solution's most valuable feature is log reporting.
The solution's most valuable feature is its ease of use.
The most valuable feature is its user-friendly interface - even those unfamiliar with firewalls can easily manage it.
I find this solution valuable for full monitoring, centralized control for reporting, and centralized management.
The platform is quite similar to the firewall interface, making it easier for tech consultants to manage.
The SD-WAN capability is particularly valued because it allows for easy management of firewalls remotely.
FortiCloud can help with your wireless and security challenges in a number of ways. Our solution addresses common IT difficulties including time-consuming provisioning, high investment costs, complex management, vulnerability to advanced threats, and the need to easily scale with growth.
Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.