Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and Palo Alto Networks Panorama compete in the network management category. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud seems to have the upper hand for users prioritizing cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is favored for its advanced management features despite its higher price point.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers robust inspection capabilities, ease of use, and strong integration with Fortinet tools. It is recognized for stability and effective reporting, with excellent firewall and VPN capabilities. Conversely, Palo Alto Networks Panorama is known for its advanced centralized management, threat intelligence, and ease of policy management, which are highly valued, especially in larger deployments.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud could improve integration capabilities, simplify configuration, and make pricing and renewal processes more transparent. Palo Alto Networks Panorama could enhance real-time monitoring, simplify setup procedures, and address its pricing strategy to improve integration with other platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is straightforward to deploy across various environments, with generally well-regarded support, though some users experience occasional delays. Palo Alto Networks Panorama, while robust in large environments, could face deployment challenges. Its support is responsive, particularly when issues are escalated, though user training and support material clarity could be improved.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is praised for cost-effectiveness, offering flexible licensing models that suit different business sizes. Palo Alto Networks Panorama tends to be more expensive with complex licensing but often provides strong ROI through advanced features that justify higher costs for larger organizations.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has improved our clients' cost savings and efficiency.
The cloud aspect provides flexibility in disaster recovery and cost management.
In terms of cost savings or efficiency in our company's IT network management, I would say that the tool is very efficient because we have no problems with it at all.
I have received good support from FortiGate, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
Technically, the support team is good, and they have very good relations with users and even partners.
The team is responsive, and most cases are handled promptly.
The technical support from Palo Alto is rated around nine out of ten.
The technical support by Palo Alto Networks is great because the response time is solid.
The tech support I've encountered has been good, prompt, and fast.
We plan to deploy VoIP in the future and aim to leverage more VoIP capabilities for our remote operations.
I rate the product's scalability a ten out of ten.
It's very easy to add new devices and push the configuration templates.
Scalability is primarily enhanced by Strata Cloud Manager as it is much easier to scale in the cloud than in an on-premises installation.
Scalability depends on whether it's a hardware or virtual machine model.
We weren't bothered even by a single incident for the past three years.
But in three or four years, I only had problems logging in three times.
It is a very stable solution.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is very stable.
There's a need to improve or invest more in an application that can follow users wherever they go.
The Linux version currently lacks some of the latest features, notably in the IPv6 tool stack, which is available for Windows clients.
It would be advantageous if it were more cost-effective.
In terms of operation, it is quite important that the staff managing the Panorama should be technically sound enough, and they should know exactly what they are doing.
The AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud.
I would like to improve the dashboards on Palo Alto Networks Panorama, especially because I work in an environment where my managers are not really that technical.
There are no additional costs.
Therefore, the cost-benefit is quite significant.
You shouldn't prioritize cheapness over security or other poor technology.
Virtual Panorama is well-priced and is sold every time there's a solution.
Commercially, compared to Fortinet, Palo Alto is more expensive.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is expensive but provides good value for money.
The solution's most valuable feature is log reporting.
The solution's most valuable feature is its ease of use.
The most valuable feature is its user-friendly interface - even those unfamiliar with firewalls can easily manage it.
I find this solution valuable for full monitoring, centralized control for reporting, and centralized management.
We do not currently have a SIEM solution, so we are heavily relying on the monitoring features of Palo Alto Networks Panorama to conduct our investigations and log reviews.
The platform is quite similar to the firewall interface, making it easier for tech consultants to manage.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks Panorama | 7.0% |
| Fortinet FortiGate Cloud | 4.5% |
| Other | 88.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
FortiCloud can help with your wireless and security challenges in a number of ways. Our solution addresses common IT difficulties including time-consuming provisioning, high investment costs, complex management, vulnerability to advanced threats, and the need to easily scale with growth.
Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
