We performed a comparison between AWS Firewall Manager and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management."AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."
"I like its flexibility."
"The initial setup isn't very complex, it's user-friendly."
"The solution, especially the latest versions, is very stable."
"Technical support is helpful and knowledgeable."
"Panorama enables you to provision all your firewalls and other things as a cluster. It is quite useful for that."
"It is great that the records go back to 30 days."
"Centralized firewall management and update management are the most valuable features."
"It's great for creating signatures and activating activities."
"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."
"The solution's utilization of network ports makes things as complex as possible."
"Instead of searching their knowledge base in their website, maybe they can interact with us in the user interface to explain things better."
"As the cybersecurity threats have become more aggressive these days, Palo Alto Networks Panorama can still be improved, particularly on the security side, for example, more network management, and penetration test. Improving the security feature for internal endpoints is needed in the solution."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama has some bugs that could be fixed."
"Price is probably one of the biggest things that we struggle with, specifically with Palo, and that's across their whole portfolio."
"We found a vulnerability where when we have a low flow, like 2.7K, it is not getting fired by the threat prevention. That's something important to improve on. They should have a proxy or some solution to solve the issue. We also found some issues around decrypting the flow. When we have more flow than expected to decrypt, the performance goes down."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Panorama could be better."
"The customer support needs to be better."
AWS Firewall Manager is ranked 7th in Firewall Security Management with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 4th in Firewall Security Management with 45 reviews. AWS Firewall Manager is rated 7.0, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Firewall Manager writes "It's built into the virtual private network so you can control all the traffic, but it lacks UTM features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Easy to manage with a straightforward initial setup and good stability". AWS Firewall Manager is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Azure Firewall Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center and FireMon, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, FireMon and Azure Firewall Manager.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
