AWS Firewall Manager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.3% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,491 Views
1,491 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Read 93 Palo Alto Networks Panorama reviews

6,387 Views
5,429 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Panorama and AWS Firewall Manager compete in centralized firewall management. Panorama appears to have the upper hand due to its versatile integration capabilities beyond AWS and detailed threat intelligence.

Features: Palo Alto Networks Panorama provides centralized firewall management, enabling users to control multiple firewalls from one interface. It features automation capabilities for task management, robust threat intelligence, and detailed reporting. AWS Firewall Manager offers seamless integration within the AWS ecosystem, automated policy application, and robust scalability that efficiently manages AWS resources.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks Panorama could improve OS update scheduling, performance speed, and Active Directory integration, which currently incurs unwelcome traffic. Documentation clarity on automation processes is also needed. AWS Firewall Manager's extensive features present a learning curve, with many features rarely used. Improving logging features and community documentation would aid in user navigation and integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto Networks Panorama is effective across on-premises and hybrid cloud environments but has mixed feedback on technical support, with some experiencing delays. AWS Firewall Manager excels in public and hybrid cloud deployments within AWS, but its multitude of features can complicate adoption. Support is generally considered reliable.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks Panorama is viewed as expensive but offers good value for larger deployments, though licensing costs are high compared to competitors. AWS Firewall Manager offers a cost-efficient, scalable solution with a pay-as-you-go model that provides financial flexibility, though AWS services are often seen as costly, impacting ROI perception.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,957 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 4.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is 8.8%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks Panorama	8.8%
AWS Firewall Manager	4.3%
Other	86.9%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

Richard Dombo

Application Support Administrator at Meridian Port Services

Monitoring and managing multiple firewalls has become more efficient through centralized oversight and reliable logging

I would say that while Palo Alto Networks Panorama reporting capability is functional, it is not really intuitive. The presentation is not really as advanced as what an advanced solution would have provided. I would like to improve the dashboards on Palo Alto Networks Panorama, especially because I work in an environment where my managers are not really that technical. They do a great job leading us, but they do not have a technical background. If the dashboard could be improved to suit more executive use cases when it comes to reporting, that would be excellent. It is basic as far as I am concerned, and from an executive standpoint, it is not really that good. I would rate Palo Alto Networks Panorama as a product nine or 9.5 out of ten because there is always room for improvement, especially on the dashboard. I think if they could improve the dashboard, I would give them ten out of ten because from a technical standpoint, the dashboard is good, but at an executive level, it is not really that good. I usually struggle when doing presentations to my bosses because the dashboard and reporting from Palo Alto Networks Panorama are not as polished as they could be.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

"The most valuable feature is scaling, which allows you to deploy one configuration and scan and deploy it across the network. The automated policy application feature also streamlines security operations."

"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

"My advice for anybody who is considering the AWS Firewall Manager is that it is pretty simple to set up and easy to use."

"Overall, it improved our security posture and made audits much easier."

"We work with compliance monitoring in the product, which is helpful for identifying framework-based misconfigurations, as it can tell you where to deploy firewall policies based on the frameworks."

"Also, the strength of the community is invaluable."

"After implementing AWS Firewall Manager, we reduced our manual security configuration effort by around sixty to seventy percent as the policies are now centralized, managed, and automatically enforced."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"In Panorama, installing the policy, and pushing the policy, it's quite seamless."

"A valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is reporting because it gives you different reports on data, logs, and threats. I also like the centralized firewall management feature of the product."

"It has shared profiles for all gateways. If I do not have Panorama, I need to create a separate profile for each and every gateway by logging into that particular gateway, but with Panorama, I can create a shared profile and just push it down to each and every gateway connected to it."

"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks Panorama are centralized management. We can manage all our firewalls."

"It is a good solution."

"What I find brilliant in Palo Alto Networks Panorama is that you can create variables."

"Suppose you have four or five firewalls for different environments related to the same customer; you can buy one license for Panorama and handle the management of all these firewalls simultaneously from one console."

"Support from Palo Alto is very good."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama pros

Cons

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

"The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities."

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"Panorama needs to work on its configuration issues."

"Palo Alto needs to improve deployment by making it easier to deploy an agent to a desktop."

"Pricing is always something that consumers hope will be addressed in their favor."

"Palo Alto Networks Panorama is a more expensive solution than competitors. They should lower the price to stay competitive."

"If your staff is not technical enough, you have to be very careful if you have production devices on Panorama because once you push any changes, those get pushed on the individual firewalls."

"The customer support needs to be better. Sometimes we need to wait for hours before getting someone from the product team or someone from the Palo Alto customer support to get on a call if we are facing some issue."

"There is room for improvement in the graphical user interface (GUI), which is becoming outdated, especially the NAT section."

"I would like to see more real-world testing before updates and patches are released in the live environment."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"The price of Panorama is expensive."

"The solution is priced a bit higher than competitors."

"The price of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is expensive."

"The price of Palo Alto Networks Panorama could be lower."

"It is pretty reasonable as compared to other companies."

"The solution is expensive and could be cheaper."

"My company pays for the licensing cost of Palo Alto Networks Panorama yearly, and it's all-inclusive, so there's no need to pay extra for some features."

"If I were to rate the pricing of Palo on a scale of one to five, with one being really high and five being a good, reasonable price, I would rate Palo as a three."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	34
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

The pricing is reasonable and follows a pay-as-you-go model, which makes it cost-effective for scaling the environment. There is no significant setup cost since the native AWS services and licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting. Simplifying the initial setup and providing clearer d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager is to centrally manage and enforce security policies across the multiple AWS accounts and resources within our organization. It helps to streamline the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Panorama?

We did not purchase Palo Alto Networks Panorama through the Azure Marketplace. We purchased it directly through Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?

From a monitoring perspective, if we could improve on data retention and keep it for quite a long time, such as 90 days of data retention, that would be good for us to manage our CPU usage, as we c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Panorama?

My main use case for Palo Alto Networks Panorama is to manage our firewalls. We have around 450 firewalls, and we manage them through Panorama. Configuration entry is the primary focus of our use.

See all answers

Comparisons

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 11% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Firewall Manager vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

Fortinet FortiManager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Compared 12% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Compared 9% of the time

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Firewall Manager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Compared 4% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

October 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

October 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks Panorama product report

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized security policy management across multiple AWS accounts, automating rule enforcement and enhancing compliance efforts seamlessly integrated with AWS services like WAF and Shield.

AWS Firewall Manager is designed for efficient security policy management, offering features like automatic rule enforcement and real-time compliance monitoring. The platform integrates with AWS services, assisting organizations in streamlining audits through centralized management and accurate analytics. Its built-in compliance dashboard and scalability features help reduce manual workloads and potential security misconfigurations, while community support aids in addressing challenges swiftly.

What are AWS Firewall Manager's standout features?

Centralized Policy Management: Streamlines rule enforcement across accounts.
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Tracks policy adherence seamlessly.
Auto-Remediation: Automatically addresses security issues.
Seamless Integration: Works well with AWS services like WAF and Shield.
Compliance Dashboard: Offers clarity and insights for audits.

What benefits and ROI should organizations evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces manual efforts and misconfigurations.
Streamlined Audits: Simplifies compliance checks and reporting.
Efficiency Across Accounts: Brings consistency to security rules.
Community Support: Provides quick solutions to challenges.

Industries with regulatory requirements often implement AWS Firewall Manager to manage security policies, ensuring consistent enforcement of WAF rules and protecting web applications from threats like SQL injection. It's crucial for environments needing compliance monitoring and regular updates, especially in sectors dealing with cloud infrastructure and file transfers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized management, simplifying configuration and enhancing automation. Its robust security features and user-friendly interface support efficient operations, ideal for managing multiple firewalls across diverse environments.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama is designed for enterprises looking to streamline security management across multiple locations. This solution simplifies device management and ensures consistent policy deployment. Equipped with advanced security features and flexible automation capabilities, it supports seamless scaling and real-time updating of firewalls globally. Robust logging and comprehensive reporting tools enhance monitoring and compliance, while application visibility and threat prevention provide thorough protection. Despite its merits, some users suggest improvements in deployment ease, integration, and support to maximize its effectiveness.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks Panorama?

Centralized Management: Controls multiple firewalls from a single platform.
Automation Capabilities: Automates configuration and updates for efficiency.
Advanced Security: Integrates threat prevention and application visibility.
Robust Logging and Reporting: Offers detailed logging and reporting tools.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Simplifies policy management across varied locations.
Scalability: Designed to handle enterprise-level networks with ease.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual configurations.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens security posture with integrated features.
Flexible Management: Adapts to diverse network environments seamlessly.
Cost Savings: Streamlines processes, potentially lowering operational costs.
Time Saving: Speeds up policy deployment and updates across systems.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama proves particularly effective in industries with extensive network infrastructures, such as telecommunications, finance, and education. Companies deploy it to maintain consistent security policies across campuses and data centers, efficiently managing the complexity of environments that span traditional networks and cloud-based systems.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama

September 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.