AWS Firewall Manager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Firewall Manager and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Firewall Security Management Report (Updated: November 2022).
655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

More AWS Firewall Manager Pros →

"I like its flexibility.""The initial setup isn't very complex, it's user-friendly.""The solution, especially the latest versions, is very stable.""Technical support is helpful and knowledgeable.""Panorama enables you to provision all your firewalls and other things as a cluster. It is quite useful for that.""It is great that the records go back to 30 days.""Centralized firewall management and update management are the most valuable features.""It's great for creating signatures and activating activities."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."

More AWS Firewall Manager Cons →

"The solution's utilization of network ports makes things as complex as possible.""Instead of searching their knowledge base in their website, maybe they can interact with us in the user interface to explain things better.""As the cybersecurity threats have become more aggressive these days, Palo Alto Networks Panorama can still be improved, particularly on the security side, for example, more network management, and penetration test. Improving the security feature for internal endpoints is needed in the solution.""Palo Alto Networks Panorama has some bugs that could be fixed.""Price is probably one of the biggest things that we struggle with, specifically with Palo, and that's across their whole portfolio.""We found a vulnerability where when we have a low flow, like 2.7K, it is not getting fired by the threat prevention. That's something important to improve on. They should have a proxy or some solution to solve the issue. We also found some issues around decrypting the flow. When we have more flow than expected to decrypt, the performance goes down.""The price of Palo Alto Networks Panorama could be better.""The customer support needs to be better."

More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of Panorama is expensive."
  • "The solution is priced well and there is a license for this solution that we pay annually for."
  • "We have a yearly license. The cost is not that high and not that cheap either."
  • "Sometimes the company prefers to give a license to test the product in our environment before we go to the customer. But the customer should buy his own license, and that's the system here. The system is different between one country and another. Some countries say that the IT solutions provider should provide the license."
  • "You can buy the hardware only and each box is not even $10,000. It's only $8,000 for the unit itself. However, then you are charged a three-year license at $81,000."
  • "The price of the licenses could be lower. Still, because we have Panorama with 25 firewalls, Palo Alto gives us a good discount."
  • "The pricing could be lower."
  • "It is pretty reasonable as compared to other companies."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
    655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it.
    Top Answer:The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly. I think that the pricing is okay, given that we are saving on bandwidth and also protecting our servers against threats. Support… more »
    Top Answer:My experience has been with small-scale infrastructure and it works very well.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of this solution are that it works better than a normal firewall, easy to explorer all of its features, and it has the Log Collector mode. This mode allows us to store our… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is priced well and there is a license for this solution that we pay annually for.
    Top Answer:There is a need to improve the upgrade process. When we are upgrading the solution we are facing some issues with Elasticsearch services. Every time we upgrade it takes a long time to become stable… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,868
    Comparisons
    3,061
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    446
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    6,498
    Comparisons
    3,916
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    429
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Firewall Manager is a security management service which allows you to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across your accounts and applications in AWS Organization. As new applications are created, Firewall Manager makes it easy to bring new applications and resources into compliance by enforcing a common set of security rules. Now you have a single service to build firewall rules, create security policies, and enforce them in a consistent, hierarchical manner across your entire infrastructure.

    Using AWS Firewall Manager, you can easily roll out AWS WAF rules for your Application Load Balancers, API Gateways, and Amazon CloudFront distributions. Similarly, you can create AWS Shield Advanced protections for your Application Load Balancers, ELB Classic Load Balancers, Elastic IP Addresses and CloudFront distributions. Finally, with AWS Firewall Manager, you can enable security groups for your Amazon EC2 and ENI resource types in Amazon VPCs.

    Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.

    Offer
    Learn more about AWS Firewall Manager
    Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Panorama
    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Media Company10%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Media Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Firewall Security Management
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: November 2022.
    655,465 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Firewall Manager is ranked 7th in Firewall Security Management with 1 review while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 4th in Firewall Security Management with 45 reviews. AWS Firewall Manager is rated 7.0, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Firewall Manager writes "It's built into the virtual private network so you can control all the traffic, but it lacks UTM features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Easy to manage with a straightforward initial setup and good stability". AWS Firewall Manager is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Azure Firewall Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center and FireMon, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, FireMon and Azure Firewall Manager.

    See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

    We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.