Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
2.2
Cisco Secure Firewall offers good ROI for some users, though opinions vary due to premium pricing and alternative options.
Sentiment score
5.0
Palo Alto Networks Panorama provides cost-effective centralized firewall management, improving efficiency and productivity while minimizing staffing needs.
There are a lot of solutions which can provide the same features.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is praised for its helpful support, though some experience delays and complex documentation.
Sentiment score
6.3
Palo Alto Networks Panorama support is highly rated for responsiveness and expertise but varies in efficiency and initial response speed.
The technical support from Palo Alto is rated around nine out of ten.
The tech support I've encountered has been good, prompt, and fast.
The customer service and support are very good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is praised for scalable performance, supporting small to large organizations with flexible expansion capabilities.
Sentiment score
7.6
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers scalable, centralized management for large enterprises, supporting complex networks with flexibility and cost considerations.
I would rate scalability capabilities as ten out of ten.
Scalability depends on whether it's a hardware or virtual machine model.
Scalability is primarily enhanced by Strata Cloud Manager as it is much easier to scale in the cloud than in an on-premises installation.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is reliable but faces occasional issues with updates, high CPU use, and legacy integrations.
Sentiment score
7.5
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is praised for its reliable performance, with minimal issues and seamless integration, scoring high stability ratings.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center faces challenges in setup, integration, performance, and cost, with better competitor alternatives available.
Users desire improved scheduling, App-ID, integration features, streamlined updates, performance, configuration simplicity, cost-efficiency, and enhanced security in Panorama.
I remember version 6.4 had an integration with Eddie, allowing me to define a policy according to my users, however, the latest version, lacks this integration.
In terms of operation, it is quite important that the staff managing the Panorama should be technically sound enough, and they should know exactly what they are doing.
The AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud.
Naming the reports properly so that they can be easily identified would be an improvement.
 

Setup Cost

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is costly, but offers flexible licensing for feature customization, rated moderate to high.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is costly but valued for robust features; bulk discounts and virtual setups offer savings.
Virtual Panorama is well-priced and is sold every time there's a solution.
Commercially, compared to Fortinet, Palo Alto is more expensive.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is expensive but provides good value for money.
 

Valuable Features

Cisco Secure Firewall offers centralized management, integration, and advanced protection features, praised for scalability, stability, and threat intelligence.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama streamlines multi-firewall management with ease of use, scalability, advanced security, automation, and integration features.
It provides full visibility of my devices, whether I have six or ten devices.
I find this solution valuable for full monitoring, centralized control for reporting, and centralized management.
The platform is quite similar to the firewall interface, making it easier for tech consultants to manage.
The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Panorama, in my case, is the reporting.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Firewall Manag...
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
91
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is 7.1%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Panorama7.1%
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center1.3%
Other91.6%
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

Yonas Abebe - PeerSpot reviewer
Great dashboard with extensive visibility and good support
I expect more integration with AI. I expect Cisco to be easier for users in India, especially for junior users. For a junior one, it may somehow be complex, especially when configuring something. I remember version 6.4 had an integration with Eddie, allowing me to define a policy according to my users, however, the latest version, lacks this integration. The logging of FMC should be improved as it does not offer real-time solutions like DazaSodo.
Waleed Aboda - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized monitoring enhances control while seeking greater flexibility and rapid response
I am still working for Lotus. We work with Palo Alto three series, Panorama, and Firewall Banu, specifically Firewall three series and five series I find this solution valuable for full monitoring, centralized control for reporting, and centralized management. These features are instrumental in…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
23%
Computer Software Company
15%
Engineering Company
7%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise47
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?
The platform has significantly enhanced our organization's operations by providing secure communication channels between different office locations.
What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?
Licensing has been a challenge with Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, and personally, I would consider switching to another solution. We are thinking of taking a Fortinet or another solution...
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
If you go with the cloud-based deployment, it is pretty much affordable. If you go with the physical bare-metal hardware, then it is quite expensive.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
I do see some disadvantages with Panorama. If your staff is not technical enough, you have to be very careful if you have production devices on Panorama because once you push any changes, those get...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.