"The documentation has been satisfactory."
"I am very comfortable with it, including it's reporting on threats and through its activities."
"On the one or two occasions that I had to make use of technical support, I felt it to be pretty good."
"Networks Panorama has improved our organizational security"
"Centralized firewall management and update management are the most valuable features."
"The product can scale."
"The telemetry visibility is really good as well as the automated workflows for creating policies. The overall solution is quite intuitive to use."
"The solution, especially the latest versions, is very stable."
"The ability to manage a large number of firewalls from a single point is most valuable."
"The product features allow the capacity to take effective, advanced security measures."
"Fortinet FortiPortal could improve by providing a learning portal and better security."
"It's useful for us but if it had more educational reporting, it would good. It's not necessarily lacking but it's an area that could get better."
"An area for improvement would be the connectivity, which sometimes means logs can be slow to display."
"They need to do less bug-related releases and create versions that are stable for at least six months at a time. I don't find this issue in other solutions like Cisco, Check Point, FortiGate, or others. Those just provide a patch if there is a bug and we don't have to worry about downtime."
"The solution's utilization of network ports makes things as complex as possible."
"We found a vulnerability where when we have a low flow, like 2.7K, it is not getting fired by the threat prevention. That's something important to improve on. They should have a proxy or some solution to solve the issue. We also found some issues around decrypting the flow. When we have more flow than expected to decrypt, the performance goes down."
"At times we have noticed that we get into issues where Panorama is going too slow or has other little problems. The performance can suffer occasionally."
"It could be more secure."
"It's difficult to implement."
"It should have more connection with Threat Intelligence Cloud. They can also include features related to SecOps and automation API."
Fortinet FortiPortal is ranked 8th in Firewall Security Management with 2 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 4th in Firewall Security Management with 36 reviews. Fortinet FortiPortal is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiPortal writes "Good reporting on threats, an easy-to-use portal, with good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Easy to manage with a straightforward initial setup and good stability". Fortinet FortiPortal is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), vCloud Director and RightScale Cloud Management Platform, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, AlgoSec and Tufin. See our Fortinet FortiPortal vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
