Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Grafana?

Featured Grafana reviews

Grafana mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Grafana in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category stands at 5.2%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Grafana5.2%
Dynatrace8.8%
Datadog7.2%
Other78.8%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

PeerResearch reports based on Grafana reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Performance Monitoring (APM) and ObservabilitySep 15, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 15, 2025Download
ComparisonGrafana vs DatadogSep 15, 2025Download
ComparisonGrafana vs DynatraceSep 15, 2025Download
ComparisonGrafana vs Splunk AppDynamicsSep 15, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Dynatrace4.48.8%95%350 interviewsAdd to research
Zabbix4.23.3%95%107 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business417
Midsize Enterprise218
Large Enterprise1202
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Retailer
5%
University
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Government
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%

Compare Grafana with alternative products

Learn more about Grafana

Grafana customers

Related questions

 
Grafana Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
DevOps Team Lead at Kadabra4.5We use Grafana over DataDog for log processing on AWS due to its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and open-source flexibility. Its documentation and AI tools enable quicker data analysis, though improvements in user simplicity are needed.
Director of Engineering at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees3.0We use Grafana for monitoring and alerting, focusing on observability with tools like Tempo for tracing. Though we're exploring its capabilities, improvements in AI and tracing would enhance its utility. We work with Grafana mainly in an on-prem environment.
Sr. DevOps at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use Grafana for personal data visualization, particularly for Dora Metrics, which helps assess team performance objectively. While Grafana's open-source model appeals to management, Datadog's simpler dashboard creation and ease of use make it preferable for enterprises.
Senior Application Performance Monitoring and Alerting Specialist at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I've used Grafana for years due to its flexible integrations, powerful dashboards, and real-time visualization. It's stable, easy to set up, supports multi-tenancy, and I’d recommend it, though more integrations and better templates would help.
DevOps Engineer at Vimeo, LLC4.0I primarily use Grafana for monitoring Kubernetes with Prometheus. I appreciate its easy setup for data sources and integrations with multiple sources. Improvements could be made in simplifying query merging. We deploy Grafana on Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Aplication Architect at Amazon4.5In using Grafana, I found it effective for displaying Prometheus data through a user-friendly interface, making monitoring and analysis straightforward. However, Grafana could improve by developing its own metrics system to reduce dependency on external tools.
BI and Analytics Engineer at Sandvine Inc3.5I use Grafana primarily for monitoring errors and CPU usage, benefiting from its plugins and alerting features. However, the interface needs improvement, offering limited customization and embedding options. Enhancing predictive alerting capabilities would be advantageous.
AWS Cloud Re-Start Program Specialist at Orange RDC (Congo)2.0I use Grafana for deploying OpenVideo and writing articles, but find its features too complicated and not intuitive. I prefer CloudWatch due to its ease of use and customizable metrics, which offer a more straightforward interface.