GitHub Reviews

Name: GitHub
Brand: GitHub
Rating: 4 (64 reviews)

Vendor: GitHub

4.3 out of 5

64 reviews
100% willing to recommend

490 followers

Post review

What is GitHub?UNIXBusinessApplication
Price:

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Get the GitHub Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, SonarQube, Veracode and more!

GitHub is the #3 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions and #10 ranked solution in application security solutions. PeerSpot users give GitHub an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. GitHub is most commonly compared to SonarQube: GitHub vs SonarQube. GitHub is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 66% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 14% of all views.

Helped 767,319 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

RiteshKapse

IT Analyst at Envidia Graphics Private Limited

May 2, 2023

The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort. There is potential for GitHub to enhance its features to be more like a Jenkins pipeline or CI/CD pipeline. While I currently use GitHub for code integration, I would like to see more emphasis placed on code management and automation. It would be beneficial to have more input on these areas within GitHub.

Read full review

Athmabhuthi H

Managing Consultant at Wipro Limited

Jun 27, 2022

The development team pushes the code into a repository, and the CI/CD pipeline will perform the build. We need open-source libraries to perform the builds. It would be helpful to have the ability to link to open-source libraries like npm libraries. I don't know if GitHub Actions provides this. I would like to see that in GitHub Actions if they don't. If you know the language for your build, it would be wonderful if GitHub automatically provided the link to those language-specific libraries so we don't need to search for the library. For example, if I'm using Node.js, I should be in a position to link it to the npm libraries associated with that version so my build using the CI pipeline will work well. Then the results in the library must go into an artifact repository. We'll have to depend on JFrog or Sonatype to provide binary repositories. Git has the repository technology, so why not offer a binary repository feature? GitHub has a static code repository; now, GitHub Actions provides CI/CD. The resulting packages should stay somewhere. I don't know whether they have added this or not because I have not explored the GitHub Actions. They're all public libraries, and the result of the build or CI pipeline is a deployment-ready package. Where will we keep them? That's where we need a binary repository. In addition to the binary repository, I think they could also include some vulnerability scans to ensure the code we deliver is clean. SonarQube is a static code analysis we use. There are tools coming from Fortify or Veracode that can ensure there is no security vulnerability in the code. It's a complete CA practice-related tenant. It would be wonderful if they could add this functionality.

Read full review

Daniel Piessens

CEO at RevealRx LLC

Apr 25, 2022

GitHub's workflow is smooth, and it integrates seamlessly with outside projects and libraries. It simplifies our entire development flow GitHub's source code management is top-notch. It's easy to inspect changes and visualize code and differences. Their action system is comprehensive in terms of…

Read full review

GitHub market share

Product category:

As of March 2024, the market share of GitHub in the Version Control category stands at 4.3%, marking a decrease of 47.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

The most valuable features of GitHub, according to the reviews, are version control, continuous integration, the ability to track code changes, collaboration capabilities, robust security, high speed, code management, easy retrieval of deleted code, reduction of developer workload, detailed code log, integration with third-party software, cloud-based accessibility and backup of source code.

Room for Improvement

Improvements needed on GitHub include scalability, adding video guides and official guides for beginners, enhancing code management and automation features, improving the GUI design, resolving conflict issues, adding more security features, improving user-friendliness, providing better professional services and documentation, integrating with other tools like Jenkins and Jira, increasing storage capacity, improving search function, expanding limits of the free version, offering better onboarding process, integrating with AI and machine learning systems and providing better merging tools.

ROI

The use of GitHub has resulted in significant time savings and improved control over product releases, leading to a positive return on investment.

Pricing

The reviews indicate that GitHub offers both free and paid versions of their solution. The free version is open-source and allows anyone to see the code being worked on. However, purchasing a license provides the option to make the code private. Some organizations have a license and pay nothing for GitHub, while others are on the free tier. The licensing model is user-based, requiring a new license for each new developer. The pricing and licensing options for GitHub are considered reasonable by the reviewers.

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."
"It’s an open-source solution."
"I use the free version of GitHub."

Popular Use Cases

GitHub is a practical and advantageous platform for organizing information and facilitating collaboration among developers. The primary use case of GitHub is for code management and version control. It is used by organizations to coordinate the work of developers, maintain source code, and improve performance. GitHub is also used for code review purposes, allowing developers to comment on and edit lines of code. It serves as a central source for code, allowing multiple developers to work on the same projects. Additionally, GitHub is used for development environments, storing source code and managing development work. It is also used for project repositories, exchanging files, and managing different environments with the help of branches. GitHub is utilized for sourcing candidates, storing applications, and collaborating on projects. It offers features such as CI/CD pipeline integration and version control.

Service and Support

The customer service and support of GitHub have received mixed reviews. Some users have not used the support and have been able to find solutions to their issues through online forums and resources like Stack Overflow and Google. Others have found the support to be average, with some inconsistency and a desire for more responsiveness. However, there are also positive reviews, with users praising the excellent technical support and the availability of a large community of users who can offer assistance. Some users have not needed to contact technical support at all, as they have been able to solve any problems on their own.

Deployment

Some users find the initial setup of GitHub to be straightforward and easy, requiring minimal time and effort. They rate the setup process as simple and give it a high rating on a scale of one to ten. However, other users mention that the initial setup can be complex and require some knowledge of GitHub and code versioning. They highlight the importance of following specific steps in the correct order to avoid failure. Additionally, some users mention that the deployment time depends on the project size and can range from a few minutes to several days. The feedback suggests that the initial setup of GitHub can be relatively quick and easy for experienced users, but beginners may need to refer to documentation and tutorials for assistance.

Scalability

The solution of GitHub is highly scalable and can accommodate a large number of users. It has been used by organizations with hundreds of users without any issues. The scalability of GitHub is rated between seven and eight out of ten by different users. It is considered to be easily scalable and can handle an increase in usage or the addition of new developers. The solution is cloud-based, which further enhances its scalability. Users have not experienced any limitations in terms of storage or capacity.

Stability

Based on the reviews, the solution of GitHub is highly stable and reliable. Users have not encountered any issues with stability, and it performs well without crashing or freezing. The solution has been consistently stable over the years, and users appreciate its performance and lack of bugs or glitches. GitHub also offers additional features such as vulnerability scanning, which enhances its stability and security.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our GitHub Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.