Checkmarx One vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,518 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Checkmarx One and GitHub compete in the software development security industry. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities with third-party tools and version control functionalities, which are key strengths in a collaborative development environment.

Features: Checkmarx One is equipped with a range of tools for identifying code vulnerabilities, such as SAST and application tracking, along with incremental scanning capabilities and support for multiple languages. GitHub is known for its version control capabilities, seamless third-party tool integration, and project organization features. It also benefits from its open-source nature, which encourages community-driven innovation.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could benefit from reducing false positives and expanding language support. Additionally, enhancing its user interface and exploring more flexible pricing models would be advantageous. GitHub could improve user-friendliness, particularly in handling code conflicts, and enhance support documentation for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers deployment flexibility across on-premises, private, and public clouds but receives mixed feedback on technical support, highlighting a need for quicker resolutions. GitHub efficiently deploys on public and hybrid clouds with a straightforward setup, often requiring minimal customer service due to its user-friendly nature and strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is priced as a premium product, which reflects its extensive security offerings and generally results in a favorable ROI through improved security and development cycles. GitHub offers cost-effectiveness, particularly with its free tier for open-source projects, and its competitive pricing makes it accessible for wider use while maintaining a collaborative, secure environment.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"The most valuable feature is the application tracking reporting."

"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."

"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."

"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."

"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."

"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"We've found the technical support to be very helpful."

"The technical support of the solution is good, and our company has used it for GitHub upgrades."

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

"We can make a private repository."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."

"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."

"I can't create a business case with multiple-factor authentication."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."

"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."

More Checkmarx One cons

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."

"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."

"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."

"I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"It is an expensive solution."

"It's relatively expensive."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 40% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx One

Download Checkmarx One product report

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub