GitHub and GitLab are prominent competitors in the repository hosting services category. GitHub has the upper hand with its superior security features, code management, and an extensive ecosystem of integrations, while GitLab shines through its comprehensive CI/CD capabilities and DevOps integrations, making it ideal for enterprises.
Features: GitHub is known for its strong security features, robust code management, and seamless integration with various development tools. Its ease of use for code review and branching is highly appreciated. GitLab, on the other hand, stands out with its extensive CI/CD capabilities, comprehensive DevOps platform, and enhanced merge request functionalities that support effective collaboration.
Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve its DevOps integrations, streamline the handling of large files, and enhance support for users unfamiliar with its platform. Additionally, advanced project management features and enhanced security would bolster its appeal. GitLab should work on expanding third-party integrations, improving user-friendliness, and addressing performance issues in complex setups and large repositories. Improvements in onboarding and merging processes could also enhance its usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is primarily deployed in Public Cloud environments, with some On-premises and Hybrid Cloud instances. GitLab offers more flexible deployment options, including Public, Private, Hybrid Cloud, and On-premises setups. In terms of customer service, both platforms provide community support, with GitHub generally offering more consistent and responsive assistance compared to the sometimes inconsistent support from GitLab.
Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides free access for open-source projects along with tiered subscription options, often deemed cost-effective. Users report good ROI due to the platform's wide feature set and integration possibilities. GitLab, offering both free and paid tiers, tends to be more expensive, especially for smaller teams, though the all-in-one DevOps solution justifies the cost for larger enterprises.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
The pull request facility for code review.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
