GitHub vs OpenText Core Application Security comparison

GitHub and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.3. GitHub holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to OpenText’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,342 Views
1,972 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Application S...

Read 62 OpenText Core Application Security reviews

6,541 Views
4,840 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

GitHub

OpenText Core Application S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Core Application Security and GitHub compete in the application security and code management space. OpenText appears stronger in application security features, whereas GitHub excels in collaboration and integration tools.

Features: OpenText Core Application Security offers static and dynamic code analysis, a centralized testing program, and cloud-based on-demand service. GitHub provides source code management, collaboration features, and customizable actions with robust security capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to address false positives, improve scanning speed, and enhance report visualizations. GitHub could improve security management, better integrate with other tools, and enhance user interface simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText supports both on-premises and cloud deployments, with mixed customer service feedback. GitHub operates primarily in public cloud environments with praised customer support for swift responses and robust technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText features high initial and subscription costs considered premium, balanced by strong security feature benefits over time. GitHub offers free plans for open-source projects and is seen as affordable with clear licensing, providing a strong ROI due to its collaboration support.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. OpenText Core Application Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.3

GitHub improves efficiency and cost savings with enhanced code management, secure storage, and streamlined version control for faster releases.

Sentiment score

3.5

OpenText Core enhances security by proactively reducing risks and saving time, ensuring operational continuity and data protection.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.7

GitHub's customer service is generally efficient, with community forums often preferred due to quick, effective solutions.

Sentiment score

4.8

OpenText Core Application Security support is effective but mixed, with slow responses and communication gaps affecting issue resolution.

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Support tickets often stay open for one month to three months, which leads to customer frustration.

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

I had direct interaction with them, which facilitated how we onboarded Fortify.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub excels in scalability, seamlessly supporting large user bases and complex projects with robust performance and adaptability.

Sentiment score

6.9

OpenText Core Application Security is praised for scalability and enterprise adaptability, though pricing flexibility presents challenges for some users.

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

If a customer wants to know the tools and the technology used for their application to scan their application, they provide less information on that.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

GitHub is highly reliable, praised for seamless performance and minimal issues, with users rating its reliability very high.

Sentiment score

8.8

OpenText Core is reliable and stable, with occasional resource issues and high system requirements, often rated 7-10/10.

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Room For Improvement

Users recommend improvements in GitHub's interface, integration, documentation, and tools addressing performance, learning curve, and licensing issues.

OpenText Core needs improved reporting, integration, automation, language support, pricing clarity, CI/CD features, and enhanced interface for security.

When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

I am providing this feedback for Copilot because it seems more widespread and more companies allow it rather than Amp, and it would be beneficial if they catch up with Amp on this capability.

reviewer2760345

Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice.

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

It would be beneficial if Fortify could check for CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) in third-party libraries, which I currently use a separate dependency checker tool for.

reviewer2646048

Lead Developer at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

It would be better for Fortify on Demand if they could analyze not only the security pillar but also maintainability, portability, and reliability, covering all pillars of ISO 25000.

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Setup Cost

GitHub provides cost-effective pricing options for enterprises with free public repositories and paid private ones, despite licensing challenges.

Enterprise buyers find OpenText Core Application Security expensive, yet appreciate its robust features and scalable, cost-effective cloud options.

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Valuable Features

GitHub enhances collaboration with features like version control, automation, security, cloud access, and integration with Azure and Jenkins.

OpenText Core ensures compliance, accurate security scans, DevOps integration, and cost-effective code analysis with low false positives.

The pull request facility for code review.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Fortify helps me find serious issues, such as developers inadvertently leaving access tokens, including API access tokens, in the source code.

reviewer2646048

Lead Developer at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

On demand you have two levels of reports: the first from the tool, which is the same as we can get from Fortify on-premises, and a next level reporting made by experts from OpenText, leading to a more condensed and precise report as level three.

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

Additionally, you can integrate Fortify in CICD pipeline, so you get real-time updates about the security issues in your pipeline.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

OpenText Core Application S...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.4%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.0%
OpenText Core Application Security	3.4%
Other	95.6%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration

If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 15% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security

December 2025

OpenText Core Application Security report

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. OpenText Core Application Security

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. OpenText Core Application Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. OpenText Core Application Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. OpenText Core Application Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.