GitHub vs Snyk comparison

GitHub and Snyk are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while Snyk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.9. GitHub holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Snyk’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 50 Snyk reviews

20,508 Views
8,203 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2025

In the competitive landscape of developer tools, GitHub and Snyk stand out in their respective domains. GitHub appears to have the advantage in community support and collaboration features, while Snyk leads in security and vulnerability management.

Features: GitHub focuses on enhancing community collaboration with valuable tools like Git Hooks, SSH keys, and branch management, which are vital for teamwork and code integrity. Security integrations further strengthen its offering. Snyk distinguishes itself through its simplicity and rich CI system integrations. A robust vulnerability database and comprehensive security features address critical developer needs, making risk management straightforward and effective.

Room for Improvement: GitHub can enhance its project management capabilities, better support for larger file handling, and improve integrations with automation tools. Upgrades in security features and a simplified UI are also desirable. Snyk could improve its runtime analysis setup, expand language support, and enhance integration capabilities. Users frequently request better filtering, reporting, and IDE integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's flexibility across various cloud environments is noteworthy, although it primarily caters to public cloud settings. Its community support is strong, yet technical support effectiveness varies. Snyk offers broad deployment options, including private and hybrid clouds, and garners appreciation for its technical support, suggesting user-friendly experiences despite underutilization.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers free use for open-source projects, with competitive pricing for private use emphasizing cost-effectiveness. Its ROI is highlighted by many users. In contrast, Snyk's pricing is considered high but is justified by its extensive security benefits and features. GitHub's pricing is user license-based compared to Snyk's contributor-based model, each delivering value tailored to their offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Snyk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Snyk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.3

GitHub improves efficiency and cost savings with enhanced code management, secure storage, and streamlined version control for faster releases.

Sentiment score

6.5

Snyk boosts developer productivity by saving hours daily, improving vulnerability visibility, and offering potential ROI up to 70%.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

I can see that Snyk saves the costs of hiring security developers for vulnerability scanning and security checks, as that responsibility is now managed by Snyk.

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Snyk report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.7

GitHub's customer service is generally efficient, with community forums often preferred due to quick, effective solutions.

Sentiment score

7.6

Snyk's technical support is highly rated for responsiveness, direct engineer communication, but needs improvement in response time and coverage.

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Their response time aligns with their SLA commitments.

reviewer2731785

Information Security Strategy at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

We could understand the implementation of the product and other features without the need for human interaction.

ANDRESANTOS

Senior DevSecOps at V8

For more quotes and insights, download the Snyk report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub excels in scalability, seamlessly supporting large user bases and complex projects with robust performance and adaptability.

Sentiment score

7.2

Snyk offers scalable, efficient scanning with high adoption despite minor delays, integrating seamlessly into cloud environments for developers.

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Snyk is very scalable and can handle my organization's growth and changing needs.

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Snyk report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

GitHub is highly reliable, praised for seamless performance and minimal issues, with users rating its reliability very high.

Sentiment score

7.8

Users rate Snyk stability highly, citing minimal downtime and reliable performance, despite occasional documentation and upgrade-related issues.

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Snyk report

Room For Improvement

Users recommend improvements in GitHub's interface, integration, documentation, and tools addressing performance, learning curve, and licensing issues.

Snyk needs improved language support, analysis tools, and integrations, alongside better UI, notifications, compliance features, and user resources.

When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.

reviewer2618670

AWS & Azure Engineer at a media company with 11-50 employees

I am providing this feedback for Copilot because it seems more widespread and more companies allow it rather than Amp, and it would be beneficial if they catch up with Amp on this capability.

reviewer2760345

Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice.

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.

PawanSingh2

Director at Marsh

As we are moving toward GenAI, we expect Snyk to leverage AI features to improve code scanning findings.

reviewer2731785

Information Security Strategy at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Snyk report

Setup Cost

GitHub provides cost-effective pricing options for enterprises with free public repositories and paid private ones, despite licensing challenges.

Snyk's enterprise pricing is competitive, scalable, and feature-rich, offering clear, user-based models ideal for large organizations.

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

reviewer2668065

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

After negotiations, we received a special package with a good price point.

reviewer2731785

Information Security Strategy at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Snyk is less expensive.

ANDRESANTOS

Senior DevSecOps at V8

For more quotes and insights, download the Snyk report

Valuable Features

GitHub enhances collaboration with features like version control, automation, security, cloud access, and integration with Azure and Jenkins.

Snyk offers simple, cost-effective vulnerability scanning, integrates with development tools, and supports multiple languages with actionable advice.

The pull request facility for code review.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.

PawanSingh2

Director at Marsh

Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients.

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Snyk report

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Snyk

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (16th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), GRC (4th), Cloud Management (11th), Vulnerability Management (13th), Container Security (6th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (1st), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (15th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd), AI Security (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 5.7%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.1%
Snyk	5.7%
Other	93.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improves security posture by actively reducing critical vulnerabilities and guiding remediation

Snyk's main features include open-source vulnerability scanning, code security, container security, infrastructure as code security, risk-based prioritization, development-first integration, continuous monitoring and alerting, automation, and remediation. The best features I appreciate are the vulnerability checking, vulnerability scanning, and code security capabilities, as Snyk scans all open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities and helps with license compliance for open-source components. Snyk integrates into IDEs, allowing issues to be caught as they appear in the code dynamically and prioritizes risk while providing remediation advice. Snyk provides actionable remediation advice on where vulnerabilities can exist and where code security is compromised, automatically scanning everything and providing timely alerts. Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients. Snyk has helped reduce vulnerabilities significantly. Initially, the repository had 17 to 31 critical and high vulnerabilities, but Snyk has helped manage them down to just five vulnerabilities, which are now lower and not high or critical.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs Snyk

Compared 16% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 5% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 3% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Snyk

Compared 3% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

December 2025

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?

Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.

What benefits can users expect?

Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Snyk

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Snyk

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Snyk and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Snyk report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.