GitHub vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

GitHub and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.9, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. GitHub holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,518 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,221 Views
2,172 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitHub

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Burp Suite Professional and GitHub are leading tools in their respective categories, excelling in penetration testing and source code management. Burp Suite has the upper hand in vulnerability detection and customization, while GitHub stands out in development workflow integration.

Features: Burp Suite Professional includes the Proxy, Repeater, and Intruder modules, offering comprehensive penetration testing capabilities. It excels with its auto-scanning feature and community-driven extensions that enhance its functionality. GitHub offers powerful version control and branching strategies, seamless CI/CD pipeline integration, and robust collaboration tools suitable for diverse development projects.

Room for Improvement: Burp Suite could improve its REST API scanning, reduce false positives, and expand enterprise integrations. GitHub could enhance its search functionality, refine project management features, and improve integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Burp Suite, primarily on-premises, provides robust technical support and valuable community resources. GitHub, being cloud-based, simplifies deployment and offers extensive online support, although both products require better integration support. Burp provides direct customer assistance, while GitHub's documentation is comprehensive but could improve in addressing complex issues promptly.

Pricing and ROI: Burp Suite Professional is perceived as costly but delivers a positive ROI with its feature set. GitHub provides a mix of free and premium models, making it cost-effective and widely accessible. Burp's pricing justifies its features, whereas GitHub's affordability supports widespread adoption without substantial financial burden.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"The most important feature of GitHub is the maintainability of the versions of the code."

More GitHub pros

"You can download different plugins if you don't have them in the standard edition."

"The way they do the research and they keep their profile up to date is great. They identify vulnerabilities and update them immediately."

"The solution has a limited range of functions, which is good for small companies. This is because, in small companies, websites are less complex. They also have single services which makes the solution good enough for them. However, the most advantageous aspect of the solution is its affordable price."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."

"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."

"The active scanner, which does an automated search of any web vulnerabilities."

"The reporting part is the most valuable. It also has very good features. We use almost all of the features for different kinds of customers and needs."

"The solution has a great user interface."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."

"There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished."

"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

"There could be some improvements related to the automation of certain processes, especially with the integration of artificial intelligence."

More GitHub cons

"A lot of our interns find it difficult to get used to PortSwigger Burp's environment."

"I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions."

"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"It would be beneficial to have privileged access management as a part of Burp Suite Professional."

"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."

"The one feature that I would like to see in Burp is active scanning of REST based web services. A lot of organizations are providing APIs to access their services to support different business models like SaaS. Scanning these APIs is still a challenge for many security product companies."

"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."

"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective and is best suited for small and medium-sized businesses."

"It is a cheap solution, but it may not be cheaper than other solutions."

"It is expensive for us in Brazil because the currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is expensive compared to other tools."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."

"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 19% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 15% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

No data available

Burp

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.