

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and GitHub both compete in the software development and security sector. Based on features and pricing, PortSwigger stands out for its penetration testing abilities while GitHub has the edge in source code management and collaboration tools.
Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers customization and accuracy in vulnerability detection with features like Proxy, Repeater, and Intruder tools, supported by a strong community. GitHub shines in managing source code, enabling collaboration with advanced version control, repository management, and integration with CI/CD mechanisms.
Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional needs to reduce false positives, enhance reporting capabilities, and improve API scanning. GitHub users seek stronger project management, better security, and improved merge conflict resolution.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is primarily deployed on-premises with extensive community and documentation support. GitHub, used in public and hybrid cloud environments, is notable for its ease of use and robust community support. Both products have commendable customer service.
Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is competitively priced at approximately $400-$500 per year per user. GitHub offers a free version with ample features and reasonable pricing for advanced capabilities, demonstrating cost-effectiveness especially for smaller teams and educational purposes. Both tools deliver solid ROI through enhanced project delivery and security measures.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.
The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent.
The technical support for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is pretty good, and I would give it a nine.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is very stable.
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a very stable tool, and I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.
If they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.
Some AI features might be added.
The dashboard of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional could be made more user-friendly.
The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
The pricing for PortSwigger is very cheap, and there are benefits in terms of time and cost savings.
I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.
When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.
I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.
GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation.
The most valuable feature of Burp Suite Professional is its ability to schedule tasks for scanning websites.
I especially value the features for penetration testing.
The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional are its ease of use and its cost efficiency.


| Product | Market Share (%) | 
|---|---|
| GitHub | 1.0% | 
| PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional | 2.2% | 
| Other | 96.8% | 


| Company Size | Count | 
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 | 
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 | 
| Large Enterprise | 48 | 
| Company Size | Count | 
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 | 
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 | 
| Large Enterprise | 35 | 










GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.
Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.
PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.