GitHub vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

GitHub and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while PortSwigger is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. GitHub holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

2,316 Views
979 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

2,942 Views
1,779 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

GitHub

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Burp Suite Professional and GitHub are leading tools in their respective categories, excelling in penetration testing and source code management. Burp Suite has the upper hand in vulnerability detection and customization, while GitHub stands out in development workflow integration.

Features: Burp Suite Professional includes the Proxy, Repeater, and Intruder modules, offering comprehensive penetration testing capabilities. It excels with its auto-scanning feature and community-driven extensions that enhance its functionality. GitHub offers powerful version control and branching strategies, seamless CI/CD pipeline integration, and robust collaboration tools suitable for diverse development projects.

Room for Improvement: Burp Suite could improve its REST API scanning, reduce false positives, and expand enterprise integrations. GitHub could enhance its search functionality, refine project management features, and improve integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Burp Suite, primarily on-premises, provides robust technical support and valuable community resources. GitHub, being cloud-based, simplifies deployment and offers extensive online support, although both products require better integration support. Burp provides direct customer assistance, while GitHub's documentation is comprehensive but could improve in addressing complex issues promptly.

Pricing and ROI: Burp Suite Professional is perceived as costly but delivers a positive ROI with its feature set. GitHub provides a mix of free and premium models, making it cost-effective and widely accessible. Burp's pricing justifies its features, whereas GitHub's affordability supports widespread adoption without substantial financial burden.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (5th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"The learning curve is small."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

More GitHub pros

"There is no other tool like it. I like the intuitiveness and the plugins that are available."

"BurpSuite helps us to identify and fix silly mistakes that are sometimes introduced by our developers in their coding."

"The active scanner, which does an automated search of any web vulnerabilities."

"The solution is quite helpful for session management and configuration."

"You can download different plugins if you don't have them in the standard edition."

"I am impressed with the tool's detailed analysis for penetration testing. AppScan can give only visibility, but it can't do the PT part. But the PortSwigger Burp Application can do both, and it gives much more visibility on the PT rating."

"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional are its ease of use and its cost efficiency."

"In my area of expertise, I feel like it has almost everything I could possibly require at this moment."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

More GitHub cons

"Sometimes the solution can run a little slow."

"There needs to be better documentation provided. Currently, we need to buy books, or we need to review online some use cases from other professionals who have been using the solution to find out their experience. It is not easy to find out how to properly do a security assessment."

"The Initial setup is a bit complex."

"Scanning needs to be improved in enterprise and professional versions."

"The price could be better. The rest is fine."

"A lot of our interns find it difficult to get used to PortSwigger Burp's environment."

"Scanning APIs using PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional takes a lot of time."

"BurpSuite has some issues regarding authentication with OAT tokens that need to be improved."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."

"We are using the community version, which is free."

"The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"There are multiple versions available of PortSwigger Burp Suite, such as enterprise, commercial, professional, and beginners."

"The pricing of the solution is reasonable. We only need to pay for the annual subscription. I rate the pricing five out of ten."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Liquibase vs GitHub

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 18% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 14% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

June 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

May 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

No data available

Burp

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

June 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.