GitHub and Mend.io are tools in the software development category, each catering to developers and tech teams but with distinct focuses. GitHub is advantageous for code collaboration due to its robust community, while Mend.io stands out for its security management, necessary for compliance-driven environments.
Features: GitHub offers source code management, version control, and diverse integrations, making it ideal for collaborative projects. Its ease of use and robust documentation are additional benefits. Mend.io focuses on open-source license risk management and vulnerability scanning, providing critical support for security-conscious organizations.
Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance project management features, simplify commands, and improve support for large file uploads. Users suggest better integration with automation and DevOps tools. Mend.io's user interface and documentation need enhancements, and it should extend support for various coding languages.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is easy to deploy on public and hybrid clouds and benefits from community support, though customer service feedback is mixed. Mend.io offers seamless integration into workflows and deployment across private and public clouds, with responsive technical support noted by users.
Pricing and ROI: GitHub is cost-effective with free access options, providing significant ROI through collaboration efficiency. Mend.io, while expensive, offers substantial security features that justify the cost for businesses prioritizing software composition analysis. A more flexible pricing model could help accommodate small teams and startups.
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.
One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
The actual challenge is how easy it is to integrate it in the early phase of the software development life cycle.
The organization decided to consolidate tools and chose Snyk since it provides multiple functionalities in one solution.
The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
When working with the CI/CD pipeline and somebody is writing the workflow file, it would be best to include the AI feature so if they write incorrect code, it will notify me about it in the same dashboard, eliminating the need to use third-party tools to review the file.
I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
It handles Application Security, performing SCA SAST and container scanning.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| GitHub | 0.9% |
| Mend.io | 3.5% |
| Other | 95.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.
Mend.io Features
Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Mend.io Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.
Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”
PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”
An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”
Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
