Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Intersight Logo

Cisco Intersight Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Cisco Intersight?

Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.

Get the Cisco Intersight Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight, Zabbix, Datadog and more!
Cisco Intersight is the #12 ranked solution in Infrastructure Monitoring tools and #14 ranked solution in top Cloud Management solutions. PeerSpot users give Cisco Intersight an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Cisco Intersight is most commonly compared to Zabbix: Cisco Intersight vs Zabbix. Cisco Intersight is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 74% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 20% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Intersight
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Featured Cisco Intersight reviews

Read more reviews

Cisco Intersight mindshare

Product category:
Cloud Management
As of January 2026, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight in the Cloud Management category stands at 1.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco Intersight1.9%
VMware Aria Automation7.1%
Morpheus5.5%
Other85.5%
Cloud Management

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Intersight reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryCloud ManagementJan 21, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 21, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Intersight vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)Jan 21, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Intersight vs VMware Aria OperationsJan 21, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Intersight vs VMware Aria AutomationJan 21, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Zabbix4.2N/A95%108 interviewsAdd to research
Datadog4.3N/A97%210 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jan 18, 2026

Valuable Features

Cisco Intersight excels in integration capabilities with Kubernetes, HashiCorp, and various clouds. Its manageability and remote data center management stand out. Users value analytics, workflow automation, scalability, and visibility into infrastructure. The platform allows monitoring through a single portal, supports predictive analysis, and simplifies orchestration, enhancing efficiency and reducing the need for Fabric Interconnect. Automation features connect seamlessly, allowing proactive incident handling, crucial for environments where Cisco coexists with other vendors.
  • "The features enable you to abstract the server personality away from the hardware, similar to the B-Series."
  • "Cisco Intersight allows us to manage our data center remotely, which is crucial as our data center is located in a different physical environment."
  • "Overall, I rate Cisco Intersight a ten out of ten."

Room for Improvement

Cisco Intersight requires improvement in hybrid cloud management and integration with third-party tools. There's a need for enhanced automation, better compatibility with more products, and a simplified setup process. Users find challenges with firmware management, migration from UCS Manager, and support quality. The usability must improve, as should the inclusion of features in the on-prem version. Integration with observability tools and better decision-making information would increase value.
  • "The firmware management in the S-Series is not as Cisco described when we purchased it. You should be able to manage firmware without bringing the host down, but that is not the case."
  • "Cisco Intersight's license cost is very high compared to AWS and Azure solutions, which have lower initiation costs. The high initial cost is a significant concern."
  • "I would like AI to be more integrated into Cisco Intersight."

ROI

Cisco Intersight offers ROI mainly through hyper-converged technology, easing pain points in network and storage consolidation. Users experience cost, time, and manpower savings, with indirect cost benefits. It reduces workload, simplifies hardware onboarding, and decreases time on installations. Most users invest for three years or more and find it cost-effective, benefiting without needing overtime and allowing for efficient management of resources.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers find Cisco Intersight pricing relatively balanced, with costs dependent on usage and licensing straightforward to manage. Many appreciate competitive, cost-effective pricing without unexpected fees, although some note high initiation costs compared to AWS and Azure. Licensing allows a free monitoring option, with paid licenses needed for advanced control. Discounts are available and help mitigate expenses. Overall, users find the pricing reasonable for enterprises despite some concerns about initial costs.
  • "The product is cost-effective."
  • "You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."
  • "Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

Popular Use Cases

Cisco Intersight's primary use case revolves around monitoring locations and managing infrastructure. It supports various environments, including cloud and on-premises, and is used for server and performance management. Organizations deploy it for operational tasks like patching, firmware updates, and data center management. It aids in managing physical and virtual infrastructures, supporting hybrid environments. It is also used for remote management, allowing users to control and deploy servers efficiently across multiple locations.

Service and Support

Cisco Intersight customer service and support receive commendations for their availability and professionalism, with tech engineers often praised for their 24/7 readiness. Ratings vary, with users noting knowledgeable support, though responses can be inconsistent for complex issues without specific contracts. Some users experience immediate assistance during critical problems, while others find escalation challenging. Many express satisfaction with helpful technical assistance, rating service between eight to nine out of ten, although experiences of varying quality are reported.

Deployment

Cisco Intersight's initial setup is generally considered straightforward and easy, though some find it complex and requiring technical expertise. Many appreciate the cloud-based deployment managed by Cisco, which simplifies implementation and reduces maintenance. Some note that deployment can be completed in a short time with minimal personnel, though others experienced longer setup times and required technical support. Users highlight the enjoyable experience of engaging with new technologies despite complexity in certain areas.

Scalability

Cisco Intersight is noted for its scalability, easily adjusting according to organizational needs. Numerous users emphasize its efficient scaling capabilities, with some awarding it high ratings. It effectively supports multi-environment management, remote server deployment, and automation of service requests. Even with limited current users, many anticipate future increased usage without configuration or maintenance challenges. There are no reported limitations, making it suitable for diverse enterprise applications.

Stability

Cisco Intersight is mostly stable, with stability affected during feature additions. Users generally find it reliable, but upgrades can pose challenges. Technical engagement is sometimes necessary due to bugs, with documentation gaps complicating resolution efforts. Despite occasional RAM issues, stability is rated between three and ten by different users. While some users consult Cisco for upgrade versions, most find it accessible and secure, following stringent authentication standards. Customer feedback indicates minimal complaints about stability.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Cisco Intersight Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business72
Midsize Enterprise41
Large Enterprise327
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
5%
University
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Retailer
3%
Media Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Non Profit
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Construction Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare Cisco Intersight with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Cisco Intersight

Cisco Intersight was previously known as Intersight.

Cisco Intersight customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Related questions

  • 27
When evaluating Cloud Management solutions, what aspects of it are the most important to look for?
  • 13
Scalr vs BMC CLM
  • 19
What is the difference between a multi-cloud vs hybrid cloud management platform?
  • 169
What are the advantages and disadvantages of on-premise solutions vs cloud-hosted environment?
  • 21
Which cloud IaaS/PaaS platform would you recommend learning to a newbie?
  • 18
What is Unified Cloud Security? Can you define the scope and use cases of the term?
  • 16
vCloud Director versus HP Operations Orchestration?
  • 30
What are Pros and Cons of Cloud-based Patch Management?
  • 16
How to host/use WhereScape RED on cloud?
  • 52
What are your recommended best practices and tools to prevent cloud jacking in your organization?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Cloud Management
IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Zabbix vs Cisco Intersight Logo
Zabbix vs Cisco Intersight
Datadog vs Cisco Intersight Logo
Datadog vs Cisco Intersight
New Relic vs Cisco Intersight Logo
New Relic vs Cisco Intersight
Splunk AppDynamics vs Cisco Intersight Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs Cisco Intersight
IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco Intersight Logo
IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco Intersight
SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Intersight Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Intersight
PRTG Network Monitor vs Cisco Intersight Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Cisco Intersight
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco Intersight Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco Intersight
VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight
LogicMonitor vs Cisco Intersight Logo
LogicMonitor vs Cisco Intersight
VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight Logo
VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Cisco Intersight Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Cisco Intersight
Centreon vs Cisco Intersight Logo
Centreon vs Cisco Intersight
Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Cisco Intersight Logo
Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Cisco Intersight
OpsRamp vs Cisco Intersight Logo
OpsRamp vs Cisco Intersight
See all alternatives
 
Cisco Intersight Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Systems Engineer at First Rand Bank Ltd.5.0We utilize Cisco Intersight primarily for operational tasks such as patching and firmware updates. Its automation capabilities are invaluable, reducing overtime and simplifying hardware onboarding. While effective, I wish it had more AI integration for interactive support.
System Presale at Bezeq4.5We use Cisco Intersight mainly for managing virtual environments like VMware vSphere. It's valuable for its integration capabilities across diverse infrastructures but faces challenges in migrating from UCS Manager without formatting Fabric Interconnects. Most customers commit for three years.
Student at University of Helsinki3.5I use Cisco Intersight for managing remote data centers, crucial for our university's virtual experiments. Its predictive analysis aids in scaling servers without onsite interference. Improvements could include auto-detecting devices to streamline resource management, especially UCS servers and routers.
Sr. Network Engineer at Saudi Business Machines - SBM4.0I primarily use Cisco Intersight for server management and license updates, usually on-premises due to regulatory restrictions. Its valuable features include time savings and reduced personnel needs, providing ROI beyond direct cost savings without requiring Fabric Interconnect.
Senior Infrastructure And Storage Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0As a cloud provider using Cisco UCS for 30 years, I find the B-Series and S-Series valuable, though firmware management issues and high maintenance costs are drawbacks; overall, support is good, and setup was straightforward.
Senior Network Architect at ocp tech4.0In my experience with Cisco Intersight, I initially focused on HyperFlex deployment, but now I emphasize iWORK Waterlog Optimizer for hybrid environments. Its integration and workload optimization features are valuable, though compatibility with more products and partners is needed.
Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I'm using Cisco Intersight primarily for performance monitoring as it offers manageability that Cisco UCS Manager lacks. However, it could benefit from more automation and better integration with third-party monitoring tools in future updates.
IT Enterprise System Administrator at Nafeza3.5No summary available