

![Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/2wuq6mq8liciuy8jm6aqj4dp5bgm.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
Symantec Endpoint Security and Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] compete in the enterprise security category. Symantec seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive endpoint protection features, while Trend Micro excels in virtualization support and patch management.
Features: Symantec Endpoint Security provides anti-virus, anti-spyware, and firewall capabilities alongside application and device control and proactive threat scanning. It centralizes management effectively, ensuring low false positive rates. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] supports virtualization nodes with its virtual patching feature, eliminating the need for an agent on each virtual machine, providing robust protection even when servers lack the latest threat updates.
Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security could enhance resource consumption, licensing reliability, and zero-day threat detection. Its management console can be overwhelming, with slower update access and reporting features needing improvement. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] requires better predictive analysis and cross-platform integration, lacking advanced EDR features and robust user notifications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Security is deployed primarily on-premises but supports hybrid and public cloud environments, though users report mixed reviews on technical support post-Broadcom acquisition. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers flexible deployment in hybrid and cloud settings, maintaining reasonable user satisfaction levels with its technical support effectiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security is moderately priced, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced security despite licensing complexity. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is mid-range priced, offering flexible pricing options that allow selection based on feature needs, perceived as providing good ROI with competitive pricing advantages similar to Symantec's ROI benefits.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
Symantec Endpoint Security filled gaps in our toolset, particularly with the ability to control network firewall on hosts remotely, which was greatly appreciated.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
In some cases, it rates as high as ten out of ten, while in others, it can be as low as eight.
There is no support in the German language, which is a problem for many public tenders.
Technical support is top-notch.
The technical support of Trend Micro ServerProtect deserves an 8.5 out of 10.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
Symantec Endpoint Security is quite scalable, and it is very important for large clients.
The scalability of the servers is good, as it requires computational powers.
The deployment duration is proportional to the number of users to deploy or the number that needs protection.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
I have encountered issues where I had to uninstall and reinstall the product on end users' computers to view the logs again.
Previously, we used to have multiple servers such as GUP servers and numerous servers for pushing updates, but we reduced it and transitioned almost 30,000 devices to CrowdStrike, which was easy to manage.
I would assess the impact of real-time malware scanning on server security as continuously and exponentially growing.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Device management is not very good and I am not enabling it in my organization due to security reasons.
I would like to see improvements in the scanning part of the solution, specifically to enhance the CPU and hard disk usage during scanning and updates to prevent disruption during work hours.
It is cumbersome to use, particularly in handling firewall management.
Use analytics to identify anything that is outside the normal behavior of files and systems in the course of business operation, then flag it so it can go for further evaluation.
They need to improve in this area by providing more documentation and custom scripts for bulk enterprise deployments.
It's more about awareness and maintaining competitive pricing because competition is growing.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
It seems to be half the cost or more affordable than other solutions.
The pricing is very low compared to other companies like SentinelOne and others.
I rate the pricing, setup cost, and licensing around nine out of ten.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Symantec Endpoint Security offers great features such as reporting capabilities with a customized dashboard that pulls in EDR timelines, threat maps, and compliance metrics into one view.
Symantec Endpoint Security offers many valuable features, such as file explosion, application learning, DLP, injection detection, and EDR solutions for traffic control.
The incident response capabilities allow me to resolve authentication and support issues promptly, ensuring the system operates without downtime.
The main benefit is security posture.
From my reseller and consultant perspective, the most beneficial aspects of Trend Micro ServerProtect are its user-friendly console, allowing anyone to configure policies easily, and the excellent support provided.
Customers consider competitive pricing and features when selecting Trend Micro ServerProtect, but trust is definitely a crucial factor.


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 45 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 63 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Symantec Endpoint Security is a comprehensive protection tool designed for antimalware and antivirus defense. Providing centralized management and smooth deployment, it effectively secures environments from small businesses to extensive networks.
Symantec Endpoint Security serves organizations by offering robust protection with features like rapid deployment and centralized management, critical for securing workstations and servers. While appreciated for efficient resource utilization and stable operation, some users report issues with virus detection and cumbersome updates. Pricing is often considered high. It is a popular choice among IT consultants, academic institutions, and service providers for its ability to manage broad and varied security needs efficiently.
What are the key features of Symantec Endpoint Security?In industries like academia and IT consulting, Symantec Endpoint Security fulfills specific needs for robust endpoint protection. Its centralized management and application control make it suitable for educational institutions managing large network systems, while service providers benefit from its flexible deployment options.
Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers robust server and endpoint protection with antivirus and malware detection. It's designed for seamless integration with existing infrastructure, focusing on data loss prevention and real-time threat insights.
Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] provides centralized management through the cloud, ensuring comprehensive security without the need for separate agents on virtualization nodes. While it boasts features like virtual patching and a straightforward interface, there's a call for improved integration and more intuitive console features. Users appreciate its competitive pricing and minimal maintenance but express a need for enhancements in deployment, analytics, and notification options.
What are the key features of Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]?In industries like finance and healthcare, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is deployed to secure data and applications such as SharePoint and OneDrive. It's used in hybrid environments where protecting against ransomware and ensuring endpoint security are critical. While the platform supports important security operations, users seek improved policy setup processes and additional features like vulnerability management and device blocking.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.