

![Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/2wuq6mq8liciuy8jm6aqj4dp5bgm.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
Cynet and Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] are competitors in the cybersecurity domain, focusing on endpoint protection. Cynet has the advantage due to its broad feature set, cost-effectiveness, and superior customer service.
Features: Cynet provides monitoring, threat hunting, user behavior analysis, and deception strategies. Its autonomous malware threat blocking and visibility across networks and endpoints make it more comprehensive than typical EPP/EDR solutions. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is known for its virtual patching, centralized management, and anti-malware capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Cynet could improve mobile support, integration capabilities, report customization, and reduction of false positives. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] needs better EDR visibility, vulnerability management features, and improved pricing strategies. Both products require better integration with various IT infrastructures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cynet is popular for its adaptability in various environments, with straightforward deployment and real-time support. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is adaptable across cloud and on-premises environments, but Cynet's customer service is noted for higher responsiveness and comprehensive support.
Pricing and ROI: Cynet is highly regarded for competitive pricing and flexibility, offering substantial value through bundled features. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] has reasonable pricing that scales with feature selection. Both solutions report positive ROI from users due to effective threat prevention and cost-efficient pricing models, but Cynet offers advanced features with a lower overall cost.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
I have seen a return on investment with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, as this product is offered at a minimal cost, and we can find a good ROI from it.
The return on investment with Cynet is pretty good, as it doesn't require a dedicated resource to manage, being highly automated.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.
My experience with the technical support of Cynet is excellent; they are just one click away.
Based on our needs, they schedule remote sessions and resolve the issues.
Technical support is top-notch.
The technical support of Trend Micro ServerProtect deserves an 8.5 out of 10.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
The solution is highly scalable.
We can deploy Cynet for 50,000 users, and we have deployed it at that scale, with the capability to scale higher to 100,000 users without any challenges.
Cynet is very scalable.
The deployment duration is proportional to the number of users to deploy or the number that needs protection.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
Within six years of usage, we have not had any issues such as outages or downtime.
I would assess the impact of real-time malware scanning on server security as continuously and exponentially growing.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.
Having a DLP feature would also add value.
Integration with local Active Directory, not only Azure AD, is a must.
Use analytics to identify anything that is outside the normal behavior of files and systems in the course of business operation, then flag it so it can go for further evaluation.
They need to improve in this area by providing more documentation and custom scripts for bulk enterprise deployments.
It's more about awareness and maintaining competitive pricing because competition is growing.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.
The price of Cynet is reasonable considering its features and support.
Cynet does not ask for additional costs for add-on features.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.
The most effective features of Cynet are its ransomware protection and lateral movement deception.
The SOAR function, deception, and forensics are very useful.
The main benefit is security posture.
From my reseller and consultant perspective, the most beneficial aspects of Trend Micro ServerProtect are its user-friendly console, allowing anyone to configure policies easily, and the excellent support provided.
Customers consider competitive pricing and features when selecting Trend Micro ServerProtect, but trust is definitely a crucial factor.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Cynet | 1.4% |
| Trend Micro ServerProtect | 0.8% |
| Other | 94.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Cynet provides comprehensive endpoint protection and advanced threat detection, offering intuitive deployment and monitored support. It ensures real-time visibility and minimal management, enhancing security for diverse and remote teams.
Cynet integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, providing an efficient solution for endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. Its automation, scalability, and stability are key benefits. Users benefit from real-time network visibility, ransomware protection, and deception capabilities. Cynet serves as a robust alternative to CrowdStrike, offering a multifaceted approach to security operations, especially in environments needing continuous threat monitoring and zero-day threat management. Areas needing improvement include mobile device support, enhanced reporting, third-party integrations, and AI-based detection.
What are Cynet's most important features?In the financial sector, Cynet's ability to support efficient threat detection and endpoint protection is crucial. Healthcare industries leverage its data protection features for compliance and security. In manufacturing, real-time threat monitoring supports safeguarding intellectual property. Retail sectors benefit from its scalability and minimal management demands, helping secure diverse, distributed locations.
Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers robust server and endpoint protection with antivirus and malware detection. It's designed for seamless integration with existing infrastructure, focusing on data loss prevention and real-time threat insights.
Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] provides centralized management through the cloud, ensuring comprehensive security without the need for separate agents on virtualization nodes. While it boasts features like virtual patching and a straightforward interface, there's a call for improved integration and more intuitive console features. Users appreciate its competitive pricing and minimal maintenance but express a need for enhancements in deployment, analytics, and notification options.
What are the key features of Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]?In industries like finance and healthcare, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is deployed to secure data and applications such as SharePoint and OneDrive. It's used in hybrid environments where protecting against ransomware and ensuring endpoint security are critical. While the platform supports important security operations, users seek improved policy setup processes and additional features like vulnerability management and device blocking.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.