Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Trellix Active Response | 0.5% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 8.4% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 6.9% |
| Other | 84.2% |
Trellix Active Response typically offers a transparent pricing model with no setup costs, ensuring a smooth integration process for users. Pricing methods usually involve subscription-based models, accommodating per-user or per-endpoint licensing options. The pricing range varies based on the specific features and level of support required, catering to diverse organizational needs and budgets.
Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.
Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.
Trellix Active Response was previously known as McAfee Active Response.
Liquor Control Board of Ontario
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Manager Operational Technology and Cyber Security at Eskom Ltd | 4.0 | We use Trellix Active Response primarily for desktop endpoints, benefiting from its alerts that enhance threat detection and response efficiencies. Improvement is needed for operational technology devices. We see an ROI but didn't evaluate alternatives or use prior solutions. |
| Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd | 4.0 | I've used Trellix Active Response for nine years; it offers strong incident response, quick investigation reporting, and threat visualization, though the dashboard could be clearer. Setup has improved, and I rate it an eight out of ten. |
| IT Security Manager at Telecommunications Services of Trinidad & Tobago Limited (TSTT) | 3.0 | I'm in early stages with Active Response, hoping for automation and remote visibility. Setup was easy, but I found the UI not analytical enough and the price higher than expected. My initial rating is 6/10, and I advise thorough testing. |
| IT Security Manager at Telecommunications Services of Trinidad & Tobago Limited (TSTT) | 3.5 | We find McAfee improved with better analytics and a lighter footprint than older versions. However, it's not truly lightweight, lacks some features, and we're ultimately seeking a more advanced, unified next-gen AV solution with stronger AI. |
| Senior Manager Information Technology at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I find this EDR solution good, stable, and scalable, with straightforward setup. However, I am experiencing support issues and find its high resource consumption, especially memory, a significant concern. |
