| Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji | 3.5 | I use Red Hat CloudForms primarily for server provisioning and find its ability to create dynamic catalogs impressive. However, the provisioning engine requires improvement. I have not explored other solutions or cloud providers, and no ROI is noted. |
| System Administrator Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | We implemented Red Hat CloudForms as a pre-defined server and internal cloud for automation but faced difficulties creating a comprehensive dashboard and lengthy approval cycles. While it integrated well with various vendors, it was eventually replaced by VMware Cloud Director. |
| Infrastructure & System Administrator at a tech company with 1-10 employees | 3.0 | We manage platforms like NETGEAR, KVM, Hyper-V, and VMware, so Red Hat CloudForms helps us effectively handle mixed infrastructures and delegate access. However, it struggles with network associations and requires timely maintenance, and support responses need improvement. |
| Senior Manager at Wipro Limited | 4.0 | I find Red Hat CloudForms stable, scalable, and value its collective functionality, open integration, and easy setup. However, report customization needs coding, multi-cloud compatibility could improve, and IBM's acquisition adds uncertainty. I rate it 8/10. |
| CCO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 1.5 | I found Red Hat CloudForms complex, expensive, and frustrating to configure with poor support and limited functionality. It offered no ROI, so I strongly advise others to find a better cloud management solution. |
| Virtualization Engineer at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 2.0 | I am impressed with Red Hat CloudForms' reporting features, but I find its permissions system lacking, as it doesn't support folder-type permissions like VMware. We chose this product over VMware due to cost considerations. |
| Professional Services Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 3.5 | I value CloudForms for its multi-tenancy, openness, and scalability, preferring it over VMware. However, I'm concerned about update stability, initial compatibility issues, and unclear future support under IBM, leading to a 7/10 rating. |
| CoOwner & CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 2.5 | I've used this solution for three years. While it offers good optimization and stability, it's immature, expensive, and requires extensive programming for customization, making it feel incomplete. I rate it a five out of ten. |
