We performed a comparison between Red Hat CloudForms and ServiceNow IT Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality."
"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting."
"Red Hat CloudForms is stable once it is up and running."
"The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution."
"It helps streamline management and processes."
"It's easy to set up."
"It is easy to use and simple to learn."
"The dashboard maintenance is very good, and the tool doesn't get stuck."
"The most important features of ServiceNow IT Operations Management are the discovery service mapping and orchestration."
"It is flexible. You can tune it, more or less, as you want."
"The auto remediation feature has been most valuable. They have also introduced an AOP feature of ServiceNow that we are keen to explore."
"The most valuable features of ServiceNow IT Operations Management are ease of use, intuitive design, and ease of management, and its based on IT practices which are good."
"The solution is still quite immature."
"All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating."
"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."
"Our clients had challenges or issues with the updates. Its updates should be better managed. They should provide quicker and more stable updates. Its stability can also be better. We initially faced ease-of-use and compatibility issues while integrating it. We had a lot of compatibility issues with other products. Our clients are concerned about whether it is under IBM or it is still Red Hat. Clients are not very clear about the support, and they're not really happy with it. Currently, they're getting support from Red Hat, but going forward, they're not really clear about what would be the life cycle of the product, which is a concern for them."
"If you are new to using the solution, you will find the setup complex."
"The time for deployment of ServiceNow IT Operations Management depends on many factors. It's a SaaS application, it should not take too long, but if you want to define the tool based on your processes, then it would take some time. It fully depends on the company's complexity. There are out-of-the-box product flows and if you want to use them, you can from day one. However, if you want to customize it and change it to your company's practices, then it will take more time. The setup could be faster."
"Service Mapping is a time-consuming process. The time and effort versus the benefits are very difficult to articulate to customers."
"I would like more manual issues to have automated report-facing options."
"It should have better integrations with other solutions."
"The tool can be improved by including more detailed information to assist new users."
"The setup and deployment could be simplified, and the pricing could improve."
"The security policies could be increased."
More ServiceNow IT Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Red Hat CloudForms is ranked 22nd in Cloud Management with 4 reviews while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is ranked 7th in Cloud Management with 14 reviews. Red Hat CloudForms is rated 5.8, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Red Hat CloudForms writes "Simple interface, seamless multi-tenancy feature, and good scalability, but needs stable updates, better compatibility, and clarity about support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow IT Operations Management writes "Useful for event management, aggregation, correlation, and analytics". Red Hat CloudForms is most compared with IBM Spectrum Computing, VMware Aria Automation, Morpheus, IBM Turbonomic and CloudBolt, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management is most compared with BMC TrueSight Operations Management, Datadog, Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI), HPE OneView and Moogsoft. See our Red Hat CloudForms vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
