Morpheus vs Red Hat CloudForms comparison

Morpheus Data and Red Hat are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Morpheus Data is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.7, while Red Hat is ranked #28 with an average rating of 5.7. Morpheus Data holds a 7.8% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Morpheus Data users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Morpheus

Read 9 Morpheus reviews

3,063 Views
1,532 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Red Hat CloudForms

Read 10 Red Hat CloudForms reviews

669 Views
319 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Morpheus

Red Hat CloudForms

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Red Hat CloudForms and Morpheus are competing in the cloud management platform category. Morpheus appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and higher ROI justifying the initial cost.

Features: Red Hat CloudForms offers robust infrastructure management, lifecycle and capacity management, and efficient resource utilization. Morpheus excels in extensive automation capabilities, multi-cloud orchestration, and strong integration support.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat CloudForms could enhance its integration capabilities outside the Red Hat ecosystem. It also needs to improve its automation tools and multi-cloud support. Morpheus could benefit from more streamlined updates, additional third-party integrations, and enhanced cost-effectiveness for smaller deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat CloudForms provides straightforward deployment aligning well with Red Hat technologies, providing satisfactory support. Morpheus offers a streamlined setup process with superior customer service and training resources, making it easier to deploy across various platforms.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat CloudForms presents an attractive initial setup cost with a favorable return for cost-focused businesses. Morpheus, though more expensive upfront, offers higher ROI over time through its extensive feature set and infrastructure optimization potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Morpheus vs. Red Hat CloudForms Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Morpheus vs. Red Hat CloudForms

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Morpheus

Ranking in Cloud Management

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat CloudForms

Ranking in Cloud Management

28th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Morpheus is 7.8%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat CloudForms is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Mark Wittling

Cloud Architect at Cox communications

Astonishing automation capabilities, a lot of third-party integrations, and extremely simple upgrades

It supports many features, and it also supports some of the automation that Cloudify supports. So, in addition to just giving you basic platform management—such as the ability to deploy virtual machines and have multitenancy to log in and perform all of your basic platform management tasks—it also supports automation. You can, for example, spin up three virtual machines, and you can have each virtual machine configure each other. You can do service chaining with it. You can run scripts in Dash and Python, or you can use tools like Ansible, Puppet, or Chef. All of this is just built into the tool. It is a very powerful tool. The automation capabilities in Morpheus are just astonishing, and it also supports a lot of third-party integrations out of the box. So, you don't need to write code. If you have a backup solution, such as Avamar, instead of you having to write all of the scripting and coding to make that work, they have plugins. You just install the plugin, and it snaps right into their GUI and works out of the box. It is very easy to set up, and it is extremely simple to do an upgrade. It is one of the best upgradable solutions I've come across.

Read full review

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

A stable solution that helps to provision servers

We use the solution to provision servers. I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs. The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports many features, and it also supports some of the automation that Cloudify supports. So, in addition to just giving you basic platform management—such as the ability to deploy virtual machines and have multitenancy to log in and perform all of your basic platform management tasks—it also supports automation. You can, for example, spin up three virtual machines, and you can have each virtual machine configure each other. You can do service chaining with it. You can run scripts in Dash and Python, or you can use tools like Ansible, Puppet, or Chef. All of this is just built into the tool. It is a very powerful tool."

"Morpheus is an intuitive solution that is very easy to use."

"Provides a good automation platform."

"Morpheus provides a very easy and one-click solution to scaling up and down."

"The most beneficial features for us were the API integrations with various cloud vendors like Nutanix, VMware, AWS, Azure, and GCP. It saved us the effort of doing that work ourselves."

"The user interface of the application is exceptional."

"The multi-cloud integrations and the DevOps and operational integrations are the most valuable. Morpheus platform is a centralized set to manage different clouds and your on-premise platforms. It does a very good job of what it is designed to do. It is very good in terms of features. It is extremely stable and easy to install. It is also very scalable. Their support is also extremely good."

"The most valuable feature for me was cost optimization."

More Morpheus pros

"Red Hat CloudForms is stable once it is up and running."

"The multi-tenancy feature has been very helpful for our clients. It has been working fine and seamlessly for them. Its interface is also very simplified, and it is also an open and easy-to-scale solution."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat CloudForms are the benefit of the collective functionality."

"They are a very mature product."

"I am impressed with the product's ability to create dynamic catalogs."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a stable product. There is no issue with the stability."

"The optimization of the solution is quite interesting."

"I am impressed with the product's reports."

More Red Hat CloudForms pros

Cons

"The solution's pricing and customization need to improve."

"The tool could support virtual network functions better. It is really good at doing enterprise-type of things, but one of the things on which we're working with them is loading very complex virtual machines with it, such as Juniper SRX routers. It needs to support more complex virtualized resources a little bit better. Aside from that, it is a terrific tool. We really like it."

"I faced a few problems while deploying."

"There is room for enhancement in integrating Morpheus with other solutions."

"We had to put in much effort ourselves since Morpheus's support wasn't always available to help us."

"Morpheus is working hard on creating an integration framework due for release in Q2 2021 which will allow clients to create their own interfaces and integrations into any 3rd party product that has a full-function API. Morpheus is also heavily focussed on enhancing the container management side to compete head-to-head with Openshift and CloudForms in Q3 2021."

"The service is limited and somewhat lacking."

"The product has become overly complex. The biggest problem is that we find a bug, they fix the bug, but then another one pops up. We can never really deliver on the vision we had using Morpheus."

More Morpheus cons

"The solution's provisioning engine needs to be improved."

"The solution is still quite immature."

"The complexity of the solution is a bit high in comparison to VMware."

"All of the areas of Red Hat CloudForms could improve. It doesn't do half of the things that it says it can do out of the box. It takes configuration to make any of it work, which is not uncommon for solutions similar to this. However, it is frustrating."

"The problem is that the platform requires it to be maintained and updated. Also, a few cases are still pending with the Red Hat support team since they are not closed yet."

"It is difficult to create a complete dashboard that includes all the needed features or catalogs."

"I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions."

"Red Hat CloudForms could improve by allowing more customization of reports. We have to do a lot of coding to accomplish what we want. Additionally, the compatibility with the multi-cloud could improve. The latter versions of the solution removed Google support and the cost comparison between other clouds was high."

More Red Hat CloudForms cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheaper if you have less number of servers, but it becomes very expensive for a large number of servers."

"Initially, the license may seem like a good deal, but as we grow, it becomes costly."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, and it is upfront for the year. There is no extra cost unless you want additional support or specific deployment packs."

"Morpheus doesn't directly support cost optimization, but its API integration can facilitate resource optimization. It doesn't dynamically optimize resources like an aeronautic system would; it operates step by step."

"The license is based on the number of virtual machines that Morpheus is managing. So, it is a pay-as-you-grow model."

"Red Hat CloudForms has a subscript-based pricing model. The cost is approximately $20,000 annually which allows you to use as many users as you want."

"The product's licensing is based on the number of servers."

"The price of Red Hat CloudForms was not competitive, it was expensive."

"It is definitely cheaper than VMware. Everything is included. There is no challenge there."

"Red Hat CloudForms is a bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Educational Organization

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Morpheus?

The most beneficial features for us were the API integrations with various cloud vendors like Nutanix, VMware, AWS, Azure, and GCP. It saved us the effort of doing that work ourselves.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Morpheus?

We've been a Morpheus customer since the early days. I know what they're trying to sell now, and you'd really need a strong use case to justify the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Morpheus?

The product has become overly complex. The biggest problem is that we find a bug, they fix the bug, but then another one pops up. We can never really deliver on the vision we had using Morpheus. We...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat CloudForms?

I am impressed with the product's reports.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat CloudForms?

I have issues with the solution's permissions. Unlike VMware, the product doesn't allow folder-type permissions.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat CloudForms?

I would rate the product a four out of ten since its implementation is not as good as it sounds.

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Morpheus

Compared 24% of the time

CloudBolt vs Morpheus

Compared 16% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Morpheus

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Morpheus

Compared 8% of the time

More Morpheus Competitors

VMware Cloud Director vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 23% of the time

OpenNebula vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 21% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 20% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Red Hat CloudForms

Compared 17% of the time

More Red Hat CloudForms Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Morpheus

May 2025

Download Morpheus product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat CloudForms

May 2025

Download Red Hat CloudForms product report

Also Known As

Morpheus Cloud Management Platform, Morpheus CMP

No data available

Overview

Morpheus is a 100% agnostic cloud management platform (CMP) designed from the ground up to unify management of multi-cloud and hybrid IT while empowering DevOps teams with self-service provisioning of bare metal, VM, and container-based application services.

Morpheus Data

Manage container, virtual, private, and public cloud infrastructures

Managing a complex, hybrid IT environment can require multiple management tools, redundant policy implementations, and extra staff to handle the operations. Red Hat® CloudForms simplifies IT, providing unified management and operations in a hybrid environment.

As your IT infrastructure progresses from traditional virtualization toward an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model, CloudForms evolves, protecting your investments and providing consistent user experience and functionality.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Morpheus CMP, mcdonalds, blackrock, HSBC, astrazeneca, arris, WGU, GBG, pennstate, beyondtrust

Cox Automotive, Penn State, FICO, G-ABLE, Seneca College, ITandTEL, The Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS), MyRepublic, Macquarie, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, CBTS, Network Data Solutions (NDS)

Buyer's Guide

Morpheus vs. Red Hat CloudForms

June 2025

Free Report: Morpheus vs. Red Hat CloudForms

Find out what your peers are saying about Morpheus vs. Red Hat CloudForms and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Morpheus vs. Red Hat CloudForms report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.