Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Polarion ALM comparison

IBM and Siemens are both solutions in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category. IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.3, while Siemens is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. IBM holds a 1.5% mindshare in EAP, compared to Siemens’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 64% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Siemens users who would recommend it.
IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Read 17 IBM Engineering Workflow Management reviews
  • 1,147 Views
  • 367 Comparison Views
64% willing to recommend
Polarion ALM
Read 22 Polarion ALM reviews
  • 4,007 Views
  • 1,122 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM Engineering Workflow Management and Polarion ALM are competing products in application lifecycle management. IBM often prevails in terms of pricing and support, while Polarion stands out for its advanced features, making it a worthwhile investment for many seeking comprehensive ALM capabilities.

Features: IBM Engineering Workflow Management is valued for its comprehensive task and project tracking, effective integration with other IBM tools, and robust change management functionalities. Polarion ALM offers extensive test management, customization options, and strong traceability features ensuring rigorous compliance, appealing to those needing versatile and powerful functionalities.

Room for Improvement: IBM Engineering Workflow Management could enhance its feature customization and improve its user interface for beginners. Additionally, providing more extensive documentation would help streamline onboarding. Polarion ALM could improve its out-of-the-box functionality and simplify its complex interface to be more user-friendly. Enhancing the extraction of quality data from management reports is another area for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Engineering Workflow Management is recognized for its straightforward deployment and strong customer support, facilitating seamless integration into existing systems. Polarion ALM's deployment can be complex due to customization options but is supported by a responsive customer service team, offering flexibility with added complexity.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers a competitive initial setup cost with a promising ROI, especially for those leveraging IBM's ecosystem. Polarion ALM, although higher in upfront costs, provides compelling ROI for organizations seeking extensive ALM features that justify the investment. The choice often hinges on whether the advanced capabilities of Polarion ALM outweigh its initial costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
10th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (3rd)
Polarion ALM
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 4.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Read full review
Dina Bindi - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility
It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool provides traceability and reporting, which are important for compliance and measuring progress."
"Traceability reporting is inbuilt and includes all your requirements."
"The tool provides traceability and reporting, which are important for compliance and measuring progress."
"All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security."
"It was an all-in-one solution for source code, integrated source control, defect tracking, and project planning."
"Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture."
"Good for managing stories, sprints, hydration and releases."
"We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data."
More IBM Engineering Workflow Management pros
"Polarion ALM is excellent for tracking who is working on what and how many people are involved in a project."
"Polarion ALM's integration is very good and easy to use."
"The software is stable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its browser experience. I rate its traceability feature a ten out of ten. From the initial stage to the release, you can manage everything through a single point."
"The solution offers good integration."
"I am impressed with the solution’s stability."
"It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."
"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."
More Polarion ALM pros
 

Cons

"I would rate the IBM Engineering Workflow Management a seven or an eight. I am leaning closer to seven based on a couple of items I mentioned that I would like to see or know more about, such as improved reporting."
"We have encountered issues with stability. We have seen where the entire system kind of goes for a toss when certain people use certain types of queries, which are very costly. Then the system kind of slows down a bit, and we have to monitor it."
"Lacks ability to customize and reporting can be slow."
"It's becoming less relevant. For example, Maven has evolved, and in its later versions, there are plugins for integrating with source control systems, such as Git-based systems. Support for these plugins is diminishing."
"If you have multiple projects on one server, the tool becomes very slow, and some reports take longer to load."
"The solution is very heavily vendor dependent."
"Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans."
"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified."
More IBM Engineering Workflow Management cons
"The weak point of Polarion ALM software is about reporting and time for extraction of the data...The quality of reporting needs to improve."
"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."
"The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates."
"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience."
"One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic."
"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based."
"Test management lacks an automated process."
"The tool needs to improve its planning. It also needs to add more integrations."
More Polarion ALM cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."
"I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools."
"Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."
"It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."
"The solution is expensive."
"It is an expensive product."
"Software for medical devices is always expensive."
"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."
"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."
"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
27%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
See all answers
What do you like most about Polarion ALM?
It is a very stable solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?
The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates. Sometimes, database migrations take too long, spanning two...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?
As a manual tester, I use Polarion ALM ( /products/polarion-alm-reviews ) for our weekly builds validation. These builds are crucial as they eventually lead to final release builds for customers. I...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 58% of the time
Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 13% of the time
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 13% of the time
GitLab vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
GitLab vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 6% of the time
More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Competitors
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM Logo
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM
Compared 31% of the time
Jira vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jira vs Polarion ALM
Compared 22% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM
Compared 14% of the time
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM
Compared 8% of the time
PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM Logo
PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM
Compared 6% of the time
More Polarion ALM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
June 2025
IBM Engineering Workflow Management reportDownload IBM Engineering Workflow Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Polarion ALM
June 2025
Polarion ALM reportDownload Polarion ALM product report
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
No data available
 

Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

IBM

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens
 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM
June 2025
Free Report: IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM report.
See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.