IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Polarion ALM comparison

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM

Download the complete report

Helped 892,611 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

11th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (4th)

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 2.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 3.3%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Polarion ALM	3.3%
IBM Engineering Workflow Management	2.6%
Other	94.1%

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Sajjan

Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited

Manages complex workflows effectively and offers valuable features

My name is Sofia from PeerSpot regarding my experience with IBM Engineering Workflow Management. It is a leading review site. The solution is very easy to trace. My company name is MicroGenesis TechSoft Private Limited, and my title is Technical Lead. I am interested in being a reference for this vendor. PeerSpot will create an account and email login credentials. The review will be published in written and/or audio format on peerspot.com and made available to other users. PeerSpot will email a link to the written review for editing at any time. The review may be available to third parties on third-party websites. For anonymous reviews, names will not appear. Email notifications relevant to the review are optional and can be opted out at any time. The use of reviews is subject to PeerSpot's terms of use at peerspot.com/tos. On a scale of 1-10, I rate IBM Engineering Workflow Management a 10.

Read full review

LasseMikkonen

CEO at byte

Has provided mature traceability and configuration features while supporting complex product development for mid-to-large companies

Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and test result management with it, it is very limited. Jama Connect has similar limitations, and both should really focus on developing the integrations and extendability. For example, Jama Connect does not even have an extension marketplace, whereas Polarion has a small one. However, compared to the Atlassian Marketplace where you can get whatever applications for whatever price, it is a totally different ballgame. I would highly recommend Polarion ALM add more AI features to it. I know they have started to do something, but for example, I have been developing widgets for IBM DOORS Next, AI widgets, so that you can write and analyze requirements with the AI, and I have also done the same for Jira, creating a couple of Jira applications in the marketplace as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, Workflow allows us to manage our stories, sprints, hydration and releases."

"RTC allows us to customize different processes to fit the best projects requirements."

"The tool provides traceability and reporting, which are important for compliance and measuring progress."

"We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data."

"Work distribution among team members and accountability for completion with a clearer picture."

"The pricing is supposed to be competitive."

"All of the features work together to provide a powerful holistic solution - from the dashboard all the way through to security."

"Good for managing stories, sprints, hydration and releases."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management pros

"It offers good performance."

"I am impressed with the solution’s stability."

"It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its browser experience. I rate its traceability feature a ten out of ten. From the initial stage to the release, you can manage everything through a single point."

"The technical support is quite good."

"There are similar solutions out there such as Jira and Confluence, but they are not as good."

"The most valuable feature is the function of the ALM system."

"This one tool incorporates almost all engineering tasks we need to do for one project."

More Polarion ALM pros

Cons

"Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans."

"There is a lot of scope for improvement, namely: Loading of content as it is extremely slow. Customizing attributes like story points since it is not available."

"I would rate the IBM Engineering Workflow Management a seven or an eight. I am leaning closer to seven based on a couple of items I mentioned that I would like to see or know more about, such as improved reporting."

"RTC ignores in this case, that there are other tasks in other parallel iterations. This may cause a user to be overbooked."

"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified."

"Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial."

"Complex client application and web interface that try to do it all."

"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management cons

"The solution is not easy to use. The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy."

"The system’s technology is not the most current, leading to missing features that are common in web-based applications."

"The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."

"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."

"Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only."

"The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on."

"One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic."

More Polarion ALM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."

"It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."

"Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."

"I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

"It is an expensive product."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.

What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure, specifically the cost and licensing of this solution.

What is your primary use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

The typical use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management is to streamline project management and ensure efficient workflow.

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

We are in our product development using Polarion ALM's functionalities. I am a power user, partly responsible for configuring the tool. We are using it for many things. The idea was to go for a req...

What advice do you have for others considering Polarion ALM?

The pricing of Polarion ALM and IBM ELM is pretty much aligned. They are not at the same level, but I would say aligned according to the capabilities of the tools, with DOORS being more expensive b...

Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 7% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 6% of the time

Rally Software vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Competitors

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 22% of the time

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 10% of the time

PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM

Compared 6% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM

Compared 6% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Download IBM Engineering Workflow Management product report

IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Polarion ALM

Download Polarion ALM product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC

No data available

Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers change and task management with seamless integration into development processes. It supports compliance and progress tracking and provides collaborative tools, configuration management integration, and isolated sandboxes.

IBM Engineering Workflow Management aids Agile software development by facilitating project and sprint planning, load distribution, task tracking, and more. It offers comprehensive reporting, traceability, and sophisticated resource management. Users face challenges with loading speed, permissions, complex integrations, and have critiqued customization and pricing. There's a tendency for the system to have a steep learning curve, making plan management cumbersome and upgrades labor-intensive.

What are its key features?

Change and Task Management: Robust capabilities for managing change and tasks efficiently.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with software development processes.
Traceability and Reporting: Essential for compliance and effective progress tracking.
Agile Templates: Enhances feature verification with customizable object types.
Collaborative Tools: Improves team efficiency with advanced dashboards.
Configuration Management: Works efficiently with isolated sandboxes.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Efficiency: Enhanced team workflows and productivity.
Compliance Tracking: Streamlined reporting ensures adherence to standards.
Integration: Reduced complexity in development projects.
Customization: Flexible processes tailored to specific project needs.
Traceability: Ensure accountability across project stages.

In industries like finance and healthcare, IBM Engineering Workflow Management supports Agile methodologies by managing agile projects, development stories, defect tracking, and use cases. It helps integrate custom processes, GRC structures, and supports API and RTP activities, ensuring traceability and compliance in complex environments.

IBM

Polarion ALM focuses on requirements management, offering structured management and traceability across projects. Known for integration and flexibility, it supports collaboration with user-friendly navigation.

Polarion ALM is recognized for its ability to streamline tasks, enabling comprehensive project management without external plugins. Its interface supports real-time collaboration and advanced reporting, while document control and workflow configuration provide additional value. Despite needing enhancements in integration and automation, it serves application lifecycle management across industries like medical device development and automotive, integrating with SVN and GitLab.

What are the key features of Polarion ALM?

Traceability: Ensures seamless tracking of project requirements.
Document Control: Manages comprehensive documentation efficiently.
Workflow Configuration: Simplifies tasks with customizable workflows.
Integration: Connects well with tools like SVN and GitLab.
Collaboration: Supports teamwork with real-time sync and interaction.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Efficiency: Reduces time through streamlined task management.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse project requirements.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs.
Compliance: Supports regulatory requirements effectively.
Comprehensive Features: Minimizes need for external plugins.

Polarion ALM finds application in sectors such as medical device development and automotive, utilized for application lifecycle management, requirements engineering, and documentation. Organizations benefit from its support for DevOps, task management, and traceability, effectively capturing customer needs and managing test cases.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Polarion ALM