No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo

Top 10 OpenVPN Access Server Alternatives

Vendor: OpenVPN
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top OpenVPN Access Server Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenVPN Access Server based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81), and Fortinet FortiClient. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OpenVPN Access Server surpasses its competitors by offering robust security, seamless scalability, and comprehensive management capabilities, ensuring reliable and efficient VPN connections for enterprises while providing excellent cross-platform compatibility and extensive support for various authentication methods.

OpenVPN Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenVPN, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.1 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server is favored for its simplicity and affordability, ideal for small projects with strong multi-platform support. In comparison, Prisma Access focuses on comprehensive security despite its higher cost, suitable for organizations needing robust features and extensive security capabilities.
Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
OpenVPN Access Server offers a low upfront setup cost appealing to budget-conscious organizations, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks tends to involve higher setup investments, reflecting its extensive enterprise-level security capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server offers a low upfront setup cost appealing to budget-conscious organizations, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks tends to involve higher setup investments, reflecting its extensive enterprise-level security capabilities.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server offers affordability with open-source flexibility, ideal for small businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced security features and centralized management, catering to organizations prioritizing comprehensive protection. Both solutions support cloud deployments, fitting different budgetary and security needs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server has a lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE. Harmony SASE offers advanced integration features, potentially justifying a higher initial investment relative to OpenVPN Access Server.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server has a lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE. Harmony SASE offers advanced integration features, potentially justifying a higher initial investment relative to OpenVPN Access Server.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels in integration with Active Directory and endpoint protection, making it ideal for organizations needing robust security. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server offers ease of use and strong encryption, suitable for firms seeking flexible, budget-friendly VPN solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a more straightforward setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a more straightforward setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server incurs higher initial expenses.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
4.2 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server, affordable and open-source, excels in seamless platform integration and flexibility, ideal for budget-focused organizations. In comparison, Cisco Secure Client offers advanced security features and strong support, appealing to those prioritizing reliability and extensive functionalities despite its higher cost.
Download Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Secure Client, including AnyConnect, involves higher initial expenses due to its extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Secure Client, including AnyConnect, involves higher initial expenses due to its extensive features.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Appgate SDP is used by organizations for network access control, serving local and remote access. It replaces traditional VPNs, integrating multifactor authentication and micro-segmentation. Companies use it for remote workers, digital asset protection, and cloud connections. Noteworthy features include configuration capabilities, scalability, flexibility, and a user-friendly interface, although it is costly with some cloud implementation challenges.
It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so.
We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17.
View comparison
Pricing
It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so.
We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Tailscale
4.4 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Tailscale
4.4 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server delivers robust security and flexibility, ideal for businesses with specific needs. In comparison, Tailscale focuses on simplicity and quick deployment through its zero-configuration setup, appealing to organizations seeking quick integration and minimal maintenance effort.
Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. Tailscale Report
OpenVPN Access Server involves an initial setup cost, while Tailscale offers a simpler setup with no upfront cost, highlighting the ease and affordability of Tailscale compared to the more complex setup of OpenVPN Access Server.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server involves an initial setup cost, while Tailscale offers a simpler setup with no upfront cost, highlighting the ease and affordability of Tailscale compared to the more complex setup of OpenVPN Access Server.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Check Point Remote Access VPN
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Remote Access VPN excels in integration with existing Check Point firewalls, providing a feature-rich, centralized management system. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server is valued for its open-source nature, offering a cost-effective, simple, and scalable solution for diverse environments.
Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
Check Point Remote Access VPN has higher setup costs, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable setup option; choose based on budget constraints and the initial investment needed for each.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Remote Access VPN has higher setup costs, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable setup option; choose based on budget constraints and the initial investment needed for each.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Ivanti Connect Secure
3.8 out of 5
Ivanti Connect Secure offers advanced security features like comprehensive endpoint protection, appealing to organizations needing specific capabilities. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server provides strong encryption and ease of scalability, making it suitable for businesses prioritizing flexibility and seamless deployment in diverse environments.
Download Ivanti Connect Secure vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
Ivanti Connect Secure involves a higher initial setup cost compared to OpenVPN Access Server, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Connect Secure involves a higher initial setup cost compared to OpenVPN Access Server, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
Citrix Gateway provides advanced security and integration features, appealing to organizations needing high scalability and robust security. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness, suitable for budget-conscious deployments prioritizing ease of use and multi-platform support.
Download Citrix Gateway vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
Citrix Gateway has a lower setup cost compared to OpenVPN Access Server, distinguishing itself as a cost-effective option. In contrast, OpenVPN Access Server's higher setup cost may reflect added complexity or premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix Gateway has a lower setup cost compared to OpenVPN Access Server, distinguishing itself as a cost-effective option. In contrast, OpenVPN Access Server's higher setup cost may reflect added complexity or premium features.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.5 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.5 out of 5
Hillstone E-Series supports security-focused buyers with integrated firewalls and threat detection at competitive pricing. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server attracts those valuing advanced VPN features and encryption strength, excelling with platform adaptability despite higher initial costs.
Download Hillstone E-Series vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
Hillstone E-Series involves minimal setup costs, offering straightforward deployment, whereas OpenVPN Access Server requires higher initial expenses but delivers robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Hillstone E-Series involves minimal setup costs, offering straightforward deployment, whereas OpenVPN Access Server requires higher initial expenses but delivers robust features.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
4.2 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server supports multiple platforms like Android and Windows, offering flexibility and cost-effectiveness with open-source advantages. In comparison, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway provides integration with enterprise tools and managed services, appealing to businesses needing cloud solutions despite its higher operating costs.
Download Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server typically involves higher initial setup costs compared to Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whose competitive pricing makes it a cost-effective alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server typically involves higher initial setup costs compared to Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whose competitive pricing makes it a cost-effective alternative.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
NordLayer
4.0 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
NordLayer
4.0 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server offers competitive pricing and support with robust encryption and broad device compatibility. In comparison, NordLayer appeals to tech buyers with its advanced features like scalable security solutions and cloud flexibility, making it a preferable choice for those prioritizing long-term efficiency and ROI.
OpenVPN Access Server typically incurs lower setup costs while NordLayer may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server typically incurs lower setup costs while NordLayer may require a higher initial investment.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Cisco IOS SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
Cisco IOS SSL VPN excels in integration with enterprise systems, ensuring robust security, while being stable and scalable. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server offers flexibility, open-source affordability, and ease of use, ideal for budget-conscious projects seeking straightforward deployment across various cloud environments.
Download Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
Cisco IOS SSL VPN typically requires a higher initial setup investment, while OpenVPN Access Server often offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in their entry-level pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco IOS SSL VPN typically requires a higher initial setup investment, while OpenVPN Access Server often offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in their entry-level pricing structures.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Absolute Secure Access
1 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server attracts tech buyers with cost-effective pricing and strong support, suitable for those prioritizing quick deployment. In comparison, Absolute Secure Access appeals with its advanced features and comprehensive integration, ideal for businesses seeking extensive security and willing to invest more initially.
OpenVPN Access Server has a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while Absolute Secure Access may involve higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server has a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while Absolute Secure Access may involve higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced security features.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
SonicWall Netextender
3.5 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server, being open-source, offers flexibility with community-driven support and scalable solutions for diverse deployments. In comparison, SonicWall NetExtender integrates seamlessly with existing firewall packages, providing strong security and competitive pricing appealing to enterprises needing robust authentication features.
Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. SonicWall Netextender Report
OpenVPN Access Server offers competitive setup costs, providing a cost-effective solution, while SonicWall Netextender tends to involve higher initial fees, reflecting its comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server offers competitive setup costs, providing a cost-effective solution, while SonicWall Netextender tends to involve higher initial fees, reflecting its comprehensive security features.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Safe-T Secure Application Access
3.9 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server excels with cost-effective pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Safe-T Secure Application Access offers advanced security features and granular access controls, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing comprehensive security over budget, along with deeper customer support.
Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report
OpenVPN Access Server has a straightforward initial setup cost, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access requires a more extensive initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server has a straightforward initial setup cost, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access requires a more extensive initial investment.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
SonicWall SMA
4.0 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
SonicWall SMA
4.0 out of 5
SonicWall SMA offers comprehensive security features, appealing to organizations with complex security needs. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server emphasizes affordability and ease of deployment, making it attractive for businesses seeking straightforward setup and cost-effectiveness in their VPN solutions.
Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. SonicWall SMA Report
SonicWall SMA involves higher initial setup costs, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable setup. The price difference highlights SonicWall's advanced features compared to the cost-effective simplicity of OpenVPN.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall SMA involves higher initial setup costs, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable setup. The price difference highlights SonicWall's advanced features compared to the cost-effective simplicity of OpenVPN.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Sangfor SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Sangfor SSL VPN
4.3 out of 5
Sangfor SSL VPN offers reliable performance with integrated protection tools for robust security and straightforward deployment. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server provides extensive protocol support and scalability, appealing to those valuing adaptable solutions. Sangfor's pricing may attract budget-conscious buyers seeking strong customer service.
Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. Sangfor SSL VPN Report
Sangfor SSL VPN generally involves higher initial setup costs compared to OpenVPN Access Server, which is often noted for its cost-efficiency in the setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Sangfor SSL VPN generally involves higher initial setup costs compared to OpenVPN Access Server, which is often noted for its cost-efficiency in the setup process.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
GoodAccess
4.6 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
GoodAccess
4.6 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server offers extensive scalability and cross-platform integration, showcasing its advanced features. In comparison, GoodAccess focuses on excellent point-to-point security and gateway flexibility, making it ideal for secure remote work and geo-restriction bypass. Each solution presents unique appeals for tech buyers.
Download GoodAccess vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server requires a higher initial setup cost, while GoodAccess offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server requires a higher initial setup cost, while GoodAccess offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Zyxel VPN Client
1 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server features robust security and scalability, ideal for businesses needing customization. In comparison, Zyxel VPN Client excels in device compatibility and advanced encryption, appealing to companies that prioritize data security even at a higher cost. OpenVPN's deployment is straightforward, while Zyxel offers premium support for complex setups.
OpenVPN Access Server's setup cost is higher compared to Zyxel VPN Client, which offers a more economical setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server's setup cost is higher compared to Zyxel VPN Client, which offers a more economical setup option.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Sangfor EasyConnect
4.0 out of 5
Sangfor EasyConnect offers cost-efficient setup and ease of use, ideal for budget-conscious businesses needing straightforward deployment. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server aligns with advanced security needs and requires a higher initial investment, offering extensive configuration options for businesses prioritizing customizable security solutions.
Sangfor EasyConnect involves straightforward setup costs, while OpenVPN Access Server includes variable expenses based on deployment size. Sangfor offers a predictable pricing model, whereas OpenVPN may result in higher costs as scalability increases.
View comparison
Pricing
Sangfor EasyConnect involves straightforward setup costs, while OpenVPN Access Server includes variable expenses based on deployment size. Sangfor offers a predictable pricing model, whereas OpenVPN may result in higher costs as scalability increases.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Systancia Gate
1 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Systancia Gate
1 out of 5
Systancia Gate is more affordable with straightforward deployment and reliable support, making it ideal for quick solutions. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server offers a higher initial cost, which is offset by its comprehensive features and flexibility, appealing to environments needing extensive configuration and scalability.
Systancia Gate setup costs are higher, reflecting its advanced integration features, while OpenVPN Access Server offers lower setup costs with a straightforward installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Systancia Gate setup costs are higher, reflecting its advanced integration features, while OpenVPN Access Server offers lower setup costs with a straightforward installation process.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
SecureLink
3.5 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
SecureLink
3.5 out of 5
SecureLink excels in pricing and customer support, making it attractive for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server provides superior features for advanced needs. SecureLink's straightforward deployment is appealing, while OpenVPN Access Server offers higher long-term value with its extensive resources.
SecureLink has a moderate setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more budget-friendly option. SecureLink's pricing suggests a focus on comprehensive solutions, whereas OpenVPN emphasizes affordability without compromising essential features.
View comparison
Pricing
SecureLink has a moderate setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more budget-friendly option. SecureLink's pricing suggests a focus on comprehensive solutions, whereas OpenVPN emphasizes affordability without compromising essential features.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Aruba Remote Access Points
4.0 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server is ideal for those needing versatile platform support and cost-effective open-source options with strong encryption. In comparison, Aruba Remote Access Points appeal to users wanting centralized management, seamless integration, and strong remote connection security, particularly for expanding remote work environments.
Download Aruba Remote Access Points vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly option, while Aruba Remote Access Points may involve higher initial expenses but can provide enhanced enterprise-level features.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly option, while Aruba Remote Access Points may involve higher initial expenses but can provide enhanced enterprise-level features.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
SonicWall Mobile Connect
4.0 out of 5
SonicWall Mobile Connect shines in security and device compatibility, appealing to businesses needing rapid, secure connectivity. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server's extensive features and protocol options attract those in complex environments. Although OpenVPN requires more expertise, its scalability may justify the cost.
Download OpenVPN Access Server vs. SonicWall Mobile Connect Report
SonicWall Mobile Connect has a higher setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall Mobile Connect has a higher setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable initial setup.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Google Cloud VPN
3.9 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Google Cloud VPN
3.9 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server offers flexibility in pricing and security customization, appealing to diverse environments. In comparison, Google Cloud VPN provides extensive features and seamless Google Cloud integration, making it ideal for organizations seeking robust solutions within Google's infrastructure despite higher costs.
Download Google Cloud VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server offers competitive pricing with lower setup costs, while Google Cloud VPN incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server offers competitive pricing with lower setup costs, while Google Cloud VPN incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Ivanti Tunnel
5.0 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Ivanti Tunnel
5.0 out of 5
Ivanti Tunnel excels in ease of deployment and integration, appealing to organizations with limited IT resources. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server offers a comprehensive feature set with advanced encryption and network management capabilities, justifying its higher cost for long-term network enhancements.
Ivanti Tunnel has a lower setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Tunnel has a lower setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server requires a higher initial investment.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
AT&T VPN
4.5 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
AT&T VPN
4.5 out of 5

AT&T VPN targets large enterprises with integrated security and scalability for corporate network management. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server is ideal for those seeking open-source customization and integration flexibility, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing control and adaptability over ease of deployment.

AT&T VPN has a higher setup cost compared to OpenVPN Access Server, which offers a more budget-friendly initial installation.
View comparison
Pricing
AT&T VPN has a higher setup cost compared to OpenVPN Access Server, which offers a more budget-friendly initial installation.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
AWS PrivateLink
3.5 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
AWS PrivateLink
3.5 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server offers versatile VPN tunneling and cost-effective deployment, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, AWS PrivateLink provides secure cloud integration and enhanced privacy, suitable for enterprises demanding robust security. OpenVPN attracts buyers valuing simplicity, while AWS PrivateLink suits those prioritizing enterprise-grade features.
OpenVPN Access Server offers a straightforward setup with no initial setup fees, while AWS PrivateLink requires a more complex implementation and potentially higher setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server offers a straightforward setup with no initial setup fees, while AWS PrivateLink requires a more complex implementation and potentially higher setup costs.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access
3.5 out of 5
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access appeals with cost-effectiveness and seamless integration for mobile environments. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server offers advanced security features and cross-platform support, making it a better fit for organizations prioritizing comprehensive functionality and willing to invest in extensive security options.
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access has lower setup costs, making it more economical than OpenVPN Access Server, which is generally higher in setup expenses. This cost difference is a key consideration between the two options.
View comparison
Pricing
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access has lower setup costs, making it more economical than OpenVPN Access Server, which is generally higher in setup expenses. This cost difference is a key consideration between the two options.
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
OpenVPN Access Server Logo
KeepSolid VPN Unlimited
4.0 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server appeals to those needing robust security and scalability, though it may require technical expertise. In comparison, KeepSolid VPN Unlimited's extensive features and easy setup attract smaller businesses, offering tools like DNS Firewall and Kill Switch alongside competitive pricing and multi-device support.
OpenVPN Access Server setup costs are notably higher, while KeepSolid VPN Unlimited offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The price variation highlights key differences between enterprise-level and more consumer-focused solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server setup costs are notably higher, while KeepSolid VPN Unlimited offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The price variation highlights key differences between enterprise-level and more consumer-focused solutions.

Related categories

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
ZTNA
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)