Citrix Gateway and OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise compete in the secure remote access market. Citrix Gateway holds the upper hand for enterprise environments due to its scalability and integration capabilities despite its higher cost.
Features: Citrix Gateway offers load balancing, robust security measures such as a web application firewall, and seamless cloud integration with platforms like AWS and Azure. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise provides simplicity, extensive platform support for Android and Windows, and flexibility through its open-source model.
Room for Improvement: Citrix Gateway could simplify its interface and improve third-party application integration. Enhancements in scalability and technical support are also needed. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise requires a more intuitive user interface, better scalability, and enhanced centralized management features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix Gateway is backed by detailed documentation but criticized for its complex setup and inconsistent technical support quality. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is praised for easy deployment and a strong community presence, although more training resources are sought by users.
Pricing and ROI: Citrix Gateway, positioned as a premium product, comes with a higher price point, substantial licensing, and support fees, yet offers significant ROI in secure operations. OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise presents an affordable open-source solution with minimal financial investment, providing excellent value for money, particularly for budget-conscious organizations.
Citrix Gateway secures our environment from potential threats, which can save substantial financial resources, especially in preventing data breaches or ransomware attacks.
The support experience has received mixed reviews, as not all support staff possess the necessary technical expertise to handle inquiries effectively.
It was very good, and I would rate it an eight.
I have not dealt with support or customer service, however, the documentation is good, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The solution features high availability, supporting both active-passive and active-active deployments to ensure constant product availability.
I believe that the scalability of Citrix Gateway depends on the project's requirements, as it can vary from simple load balancing to extensive Web Application Firewall implementations.
It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.
It does not utilize much memory or CPU on the VM.
I would give OpenVPN a six out of ten for scalability, as it's usually a single user or single device.
I find Citrix products to be very stable.
There is potential for reducing administrative overhead by applying policies dynamically based on context rather than static rules.
At this time it costs 35% more than other solutions.
Providing store credit for OpenVPN Access Server through a startup program, similar to YC's program which gives credit to new startups.
It doesn't matter if it's Windows, Apple, Mac, or Linux - they're all very easy.
OpenVPN could improve in centralized management.
I consider Citrix Gateway to be an expensive solution, generally ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 yearly, depending on the model.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OpenVPN Access Server is really good, not that expensive.
My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.
The product effectively helps me protect the organization's network from potential threats, thereby securing our environment from hackers and ransomware attacks.
It's easy to scale and easy to implement.
Secure SaaS access is particularly valuable as it ensures that SaaS-based applications are delivered securely.
The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points.
What I appreciate the most about OpenVPN Access Server is that it's very easy to set up.
It has been really useful, as we don't have to give access to everyone, and just give access to OpenVPN Access Server, and they are able to access databases or internal websites.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenVPN Access Server | 15.4% |
| Citrix Gateway | 3.2% |
| Other | 81.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Citrix Gateway is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. Citrix Gateway provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise provides secure, scalable remote access with strong encryption and cross-platform compatibility, leveraging open-source flexibility for cost-effectiveness. It's ideal for connecting remote workers, maintaining privacy, and securing network communications.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is renowned for its ease of setup and adaptability, supporting Linux and different operating systems, which ensures robust security and seamless integration across network scenarios. With features like two-factor authentication and customizable installers, it emphasizes privacy and remote connectivity. While it offers robust documentation and community support, there are challenges with user management due to the lack of a simple GUI. Users note stability issues under heavy traffic, and improvements in security features and configuration automation are desired. Despite these areas for enhancement, it remains a reliable choice for secure remote access.
What are the key features?
What benefits and ROI should users seek?
In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise secures sensitive data while enabling remote access across LANs and VPCs. It's utilized for encrypted traffic protection, facilitating site-to-site VPNs, and connecting mobile workers securely, thus maintaining data integrity in interoffice communications and IoT platforms.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
