Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Checkmarx One, and Qualys VMDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management surpasses its competitors by offering real-time vulnerability assessments, seamless integration with Microsoft 365 environments, and advanced threat intelligence that enhances proactive attack prevention and remediation strategies.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Wiz offers easy deployment with competitive pricing, appealing to tech buyers needing rapid cloud integration. In comparison, Microsoft Defender provides robust integration with Microsoft ecosystems, appealing to those seeking comprehensive protection despite higher costs. Wiz's simplicity contrasts with Microsoft Defender's extensive features.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Wiz Report
Wiz has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option for those seeking a cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Wiz has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option for those seeking a cost-effective solution.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Checkmarx One excels in static code analysis, integration, and quick setup, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers comprehensive threat detection and integration within Microsoft's ecosystem, appealing to those seeking a long-term, robust security solution.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
Checkmarx One presents a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft's Defender Vulnerability Management, reflecting differences in initial deployment investments between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One presents a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft's Defender Vulnerability Management, reflecting differences in initial deployment investments between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers comprehensive scanning with customization, ideal for those needing detailed vulnerability tracking. In comparison, Microsoft Defender integrates well with Microsoft's ecosystem, providing real-time assessments and cost efficiency within existing licenses, appealing to organizations already using Microsoft products.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR setup cost is straightforward, focusing on comprehensive coverage, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers flexible pricing, catering to businesses with existing Microsoft products.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR setup cost is straightforward, focusing on comprehensive coverage, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers flexible pricing, catering to businesses with existing Microsoft products.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Tenable Nessus offers extensive vulnerability scanning and cost-effective solutions, appealing to those needing detailed assessments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for organizations prioritizing a comprehensive security approach within Microsoft services.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Tenable Nessus has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which can make it more attractive for organizations with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Nessus has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which can make it more attractive for organizations with budget constraints.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium provides comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid incident response. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers integration with the broader Microsoft security ecosystem. Tanium's detailed data suits complex networks, while Microsoft Defender benefits organizations already using Microsoft tools with cohesive integration.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, highlighting a significant cost difference that may affect budgeting decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, highlighting a significant cost difference that may affect budgeting decisions.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center is appealing due to robust features and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender's extensive integration within Microsoft's ecosystem offers advanced threat intelligence, providing long-term value. Tenable excels in adaptability, while Microsoft Defender ensures ease of deployment for existing Microsoft users.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center has competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward installation process. Tenable requires more initial investment, whereas Microsoft aims for a cost-effective entry with less complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center has competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward installation process. Tenable requires more initial investment, whereas Microsoft aims for a cost-effective entry with less complexity.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Tenable Vulnerability Management excels with its competitive pricing and extensive scanning and integration capabilities. In comparison, Microsoft Defender, although pricier, offers seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem and broad threat intelligence, appealing to organizations already embedded in Microsoft environments.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Tenable Vulnerability Management setup costs are high, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Vulnerability Management setup costs are high, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
JFrog Xray offers deep DevOps integration and competitive pricing, ideal for budget-conscious teams seeking granular security policies. In comparison, Microsoft Defender appeals to large organizations with comprehensive asset coverage and seamless Microsoft service integration, providing significant ROI through broad feature sets and threat intelligence.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
JFrog Xray provides straightforward setup with predictable costs, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management may have a more complex initial setup that could incur higher fees.
View comparison
Pricing
JFrog Xray provides straightforward setup with predictable costs, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management may have a more complex initial setup that could incur higher fees.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Rapid7 InsightVM
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Rapid7 InsightVM
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightVM appeals to cost-conscious buyers with dynamic asset discovery and customizable reporting. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management attracts those invested in Microsoft environments through built-in threat intelligence and real-time risk assessment, despite a higher initial investment.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 InsightVM Report
Rapid7 InsightVM's setup cost is higher, indicating robust capabilities, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more cost-effective setup, focusing on streamlined processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightVM's setup cost is higher, indicating robust capabilities, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more cost-effective setup, focusing on streamlined processes.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Claroty Platform
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Claroty Platform
4.1 out of 5
Claroty Platform appeals to budget-conscious buyers seeking asset visibility and threat detection in operational technology environments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender suits organizations needing comprehensive features like integrated threat intelligence and automation with a higher budget. Claroty emphasizes ease and support, while Defender enhances integration and features.
Download Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
Claroty Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more comprehensive initial deployment package with higher pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Claroty Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more comprehensive initial deployment package with higher pricing.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Armis
4.3 out of 5
Armis offers advanced device management and seamless deployment, appealing for enterprises with diverse environments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender provides an integrated security suite with competitive pricing, ideal for organizations already within the Microsoft ecosystem seeking cost-efficient, comprehensive protection.
Download Armis vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
Armis offers straightforward setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has a more variable pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Armis offers straightforward setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has a more variable pricing structure.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
ThreatLocker excels in hands-on accessibility, offering remote issue resolution through mobile apps and strong training support. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management integrates well within Microsoft's ecosystem, providing detailed vulnerability assessments and remediation strategies for organizations heavily using Microsoft products.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost process, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management often requires more initial investment. The two solutions exhibit distinct differences in setup requirements and pricing models.
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost process, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management often requires more initial investment. The two solutions exhibit distinct differences in setup requirements and pricing models.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
XM Cyber
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
XM Cyber
4.0 out of 5
XM Cyber is valued for its real-time attack path remediation, providing high network visibility and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender's strength lies in its seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, offering comprehensive protection and extensive features that justify its higher pricing.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. XM Cyber Report
XM Cyber offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management often involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
XM Cyber offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management often involves higher initial expenses.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.2 out of 5
Amazon Inspector appeals with scalable assessments and flexible pricing, ideal for AWS-focused organizations. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides in-depth analytics integrated with Microsoft 365, suiting enterprises seeking comprehensive security insights within an existing Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
Amazon Inspector setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has higher initial expenses, indicating a larger upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon Inspector setup costs are minimal, making it budget-friendly, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has higher initial expenses, indicating a larger upfront investment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
4.0 out of 5
Rapid7 Metasploit is ideal for environments needing advanced penetration testing and exploit development with significant ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers real-time threat intelligence and seamless integration, benefiting those seeking comprehensive security within Microsoft ecosystems, emphasizing integration and seamless real-time capabilities over hands-on testing.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 Metasploit generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Adlumin Security Operations
1 out of 5
Adlumin Security Operations enhances threat detection and response with features like automated alerts and real-time monitoring. Users appreciate its integration capabilities, though there is room for improvement in report customization. Its efficiency aligns well with diverse cybersecurity requirements.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.6 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management excels in integration and risk prioritization. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management focuses on comprehensive asset discovery and management. Tech buyers may choose Defender for seamless Microsoft integration or Qualys for extensive asset intelligence and proactive management.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management incurs moderate setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management incurs moderate setup costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations offers competitive pricing and customer support, appealing to businesses with its flexible deployment and modular pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides extensive integration, making it attractive for organizations seeking comprehensive features within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward setup process, making them distinct in terms of initial investment and ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers a more straightforward setup process, making them distinct in terms of initial investment and ease of deployment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Wiz Code
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Wiz Code
1 out of 5
Wiz Code attracts budget-conscious buyers with its intuitive design and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers advanced integration and analytics, appealing to those invested in Microsoft products. Wiz Code excels in rapid deployment, while Microsoft Defender benefits from extensive support.
Wiz Code requires no initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management involves a moderate setup fee, marking a key contrast in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Wiz Code requires no initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management involves a moderate setup fee, marking a key contrast in their pricing strategies.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Nucleus
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Nucleus
1 out of 5
Nucleus enhances IT management by simplifying complex data tasks and providing robust security features. It offers seamless integration with existing systems and efficient data visualization. Users suggest that enhanced customization options could improve functionality.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ideal for seamless integration within Windows environments. In comparison, Vicarius vRx offers advanced patch management and adaptability across platforms. Tech buyers favor Microsoft Defender for cost efficiency, while Vicarius vRx appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive security features.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Vicarius vRx Report
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has a lower setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious users. Vicarius vRx offers added features that could justify its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has a lower setup cost compared to Vicarius vRx, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious users. Vicarius vRx offers added features that could justify its higher initial investment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk
4.3 out of 5
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is preferred for cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management excels in feature integration and ecosystem alignment, appealing to buyers seeking long-term security strategy benefits within the Microsoft environment.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which offers a more budget-friendly option.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Brinqa
3.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Brinqa
3.5 out of 5
Brinqa offers comprehensive risk management with valuable features like threat intelligence integration and customizable workflows. Users praise its analytics but mention room for improvement in ease of use and scalability. Brinqa's focus on security applications can enhance decision-making for organizations.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Unified Vulnerability Management
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is favored for cost-effectiveness and strong Microsoft ecosystem integration. In comparison, Unified Vulnerability Management offers more extensive features and superior cross-platform compatibility, appealing to those prioritizing advanced scanning capabilities and comprehensive support despite higher costs.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management involves moderate setup costs, while Unified Vulnerability Management offers more competitive setup pricing, highlighting a distinct cost advantage for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management involves moderate setup costs, while Unified Vulnerability Management offers more competitive setup pricing, highlighting a distinct cost advantage for initial deployment.
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
DefectDojo
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
DefectDojo
4.0 out of 5
DefectDojo supports vulnerability management with features like integration and automation. Users appreciate customizable dashboards and efficient tracking capabilities. Some seek enhanced reporting functionality and streamlined navigation. Ideal for teams aiming to improve security posture without overwhelming complexity.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Greenbone provides vulnerability assessment and management for IT networks. It offers valuable features like comprehensive scanning capabilities and detailed reporting. Some users mention room for improvement in customer support response times and ease of integration with other systems.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Balbix BreachControl
1 out of 5
Balbix BreachControl offers advanced threat intelligence and asset management, helping users understand cyber risk. It provides valuable features like automated risk scoring and real-time threat detection. Users suggest enhancement in integration capabilities with diverse tools and improving scalability for larger environments.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
SecureWorks Taegis VDR
4.5 out of 5

Automate vulnerability management with a cloud-based, machine learning-powered solution. Intelligently prioritize remediation efforts based on actionable recommendations that reflect the context of your environment.

View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Holm Security
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
Holm Security
1 out of 5
Holm Security addresses cybersecurity needs with features like vulnerability scanning and threat intelligence. It is recognized for its comprehensive reporting but could enhance its integration capabilities. Users appreciate easy deployment and management, finding it fit for varied security requirements. Potential for improvement includes more frequent updates.
View comparison
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
CYRISMA
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Logo
CYRISMA
1 out of 5
CYRISMA offers cybersecurity risk management features like risk assessment and asset management. Users find its dashboard intuitive, simplifying complex security tasks. It could improve by expanding integration options, which would enhance its flexibility in diverse tech environments.
View comparison

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)