Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kiuwan Logo

Kiuwan Reviews

Vendor: Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Kiuwan?

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

Get the Kiuwan Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan, SonarQube, Snyk and more!
Kiuwan is the #26 ranked solution in AST tools and #28 ranked solution in application security solutions. PeerSpot users give Kiuwan an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Kiuwan is most commonly compared to SonarQube: Kiuwan vs SonarQube. Kiuwan is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 52% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a university, accounting for 10% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Kiuwan
March 2026
Get the report
Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Featured Kiuwan reviews

Read more reviews

Kiuwan mindshare

Product category:
Application Security Tools
As of March 2026, the mindshare of Kiuwan in the Application Security Tools category stands at 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kiuwan1.2%
SonarQube16.3%
Checkmarx One9.9%
Other72.6%
Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Kiuwan reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Security ToolsMar 29, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 29, 2026Download
ComparisonKiuwan vs SonarQubeMar 29, 2026Download
ComparisonKiuwan vs Checkmarx OneMar 29, 2026Download
ComparisonKiuwan vs VeracodeMar 29, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SonarQube4.016.3%84%135 interviewsAdd to research
Snyk4.15.5%100%51 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Kiuwan offers valuable features such as seamless Jenkins and JIRA integration, intuitive UI, and detailed reporting. Users appreciate its security support, rapid scan times, and effective action plans for resolving issues. The software's capability to analyze multiple programming languages, including legacy systems, is noteworthy. Its ability to identify vulnerabilities efficiently, support automated lifecycle management, and enhance code quality are also highlighted. Users benefit from modularity, local and cloud scanning, and precise feedback on technical debt.
  • "Kiuwan has enabled us to give our customers peace of mind through early identification of code vulnerabilities and remediation before delivery to the customer."
  • "I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."
  • "I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

Room for Improvement

Kiuwan needs enhancements in integration with various IDEs and code repositories, broader language support, and improved handling of false positives. Users mention a need for better user interface design and more effective vulnerability scanning, especially in open-source projects. Additional clarity in rules and a streamlined process for updating them are desired. Issues with report downloading, especially under the insights tab, should be addressed. Technical support responsiveness is also a concern.
  • "Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country."
  • "We faced a lot of problems with the initial setup and support gave us difficulties around the installation."
  • "The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically, but I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports because in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

ROI

Organizations have seen a 20% improvement in time to market and enhanced code quality from using Kiuwan. Despite some not yet experiencing direct ROI due to current business dependencies, they anticipate future benefits. Users acknowledge that without such tools, companies face increased costs due to errors. They find Kiuwan essential for preventing expensive issues, making it a wise investment despite varying current financial returns. Faster app development is a noted advantage.

Pricing

Enterprise users report that Kiuwan's pricing strategy is competitive, with costs dependent on the number of lines of code scanned. While some find it affordable compared to other solutions, others recommend consulting sales for customized plans. The pricing model incorporates subscription fees, but overall perception varies, with some suggesting comparable open-source alternatives. Though pricing details can vary, many highlight its value relative to market options.
  • "The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."
  • "Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."
  • "It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

Service and Support

Customer service is consistently praised for being helpful and knowledgeable, providing solid documentation and in-app support. Technical support is often rated highly, with many praising its responsiveness and knowledge. Some users find email-based support and the lack of a dedicated phone line or chat outside their country limiting. Though most have positive experiences, indicating prompt replies and valid answers, some users suggest improvements for quicker resolution and additional support channels.

Deployment

Users generally find Kiuwan's initial setup straightforward and simple, especially when deploying in the cloud. Some experience challenges, mainly due to unfamiliarity or technical issues that require support. While many mention the ease of integration with tools like Jenkins, a few note that setup complexity can vary based on the user's experience level. Though most setups are quick, more complex deployments exist, especially for companies seeking comprehensive installations.

Scalability

Kiuwan scales effectively with no reported issues from multiple organizations using varied user numbers. Many mention its cloud-based flexibility, handling diverse portfolio sizes without concerns. Although adaptable to growing demands, some note budget limitations for larger analysis needs. Several companies employ it actively, incorporating it within their processes and teams. It efficiently manages multiple applications monthly, supporting significant data volumes. Some suggest potential enhancements for scalability, yet consider it adequate for current usage.

Stability

Users report Kiuwan as stable, with no significant issues related to crashes or glitches. They note occasional loading issues but describe it as reliable, with the system up most of the time. Stability is highly rated, and the software is used routinely. Some mention minor disturbances during system maintenance, occurring infrequently. Stability capabilities are considered strong, receiving high marks, and performing well during usage, supporting daily operations without interruptions.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Kiuwan Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business70
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise101
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Performing Arts
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Government
6%
Consumer Goods Company
6%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Retailer
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Construction Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Printing Company
1%
Religious Institution
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare Kiuwan with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Kiuwan

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan customers

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Related questions

  • 174
If you had to both encrypt and compress data during transmission, which would you do first and why?
  • 86
When evaluating Application Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 187
What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
  • 143
What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?
  • 73
Which application security solutions include both vulnerability scans and quality checks?
  • 90
We're evaluating Tripwire, what else should we consider?
  • 336
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
  • 75
Why Do I Need Application Security Software?
  • 111
Which Email Security enterprise solution would you choose: Cisco Secure Email vs Forcepoint Email Security vs Barracuda Email Security Gateway?
  • 183
What is the difference between "data protection in transit" vs "data protection at rest"?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Security Tools
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
SonarQube vs Kiuwan Logo
SonarQube vs Kiuwan
Snyk vs Kiuwan Logo
Snyk vs Kiuwan
Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan Logo
Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan
GitLab vs Kiuwan Logo
GitLab vs Kiuwan
Veracode vs Kiuwan Logo
Veracode vs Kiuwan
Coverity Static vs Kiuwan Logo
Coverity Static vs Kiuwan
Acunetix vs Kiuwan Logo
Acunetix vs Kiuwan
Mend.io vs Kiuwan Logo
Mend.io vs Kiuwan
OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Kiuwan
Sonatype Lifecycle vs Kiuwan Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle vs Kiuwan
OWASP Zap vs Kiuwan Logo
OWASP Zap vs Kiuwan
HCL AppScan vs Kiuwan Logo
HCL AppScan vs Kiuwan
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Kiuwan Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Kiuwan
GitHub vs Kiuwan Logo
GitHub vs Kiuwan
Invicti vs Kiuwan Logo
Invicti vs Kiuwan
See all alternatives
 
Kiuwan Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees3.5I find Kiuwan useful for secure code reviews, detecting vulnerabilities, and protecting sensitive data. It quickly processes reports but needs UI improvements, as its interface resembles older Windows versions, making user experience less optimal.
Application Architect at IBM4.0I use Kiuwan to modify and enhance code, focusing on efficiency and comprehensive information. It effectively handles controllers and interfaces, but streamlining calls and improving transitions would enhance performance. Its functionality is crucial for our project's diverse code requirements.
Sr. Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Kiuwan for quick SaaS scans of web applications, valuing its speed and detailed vulnerability analysis. It beats competitors like Veracode. However, duplicate findings and download issues in reports need improvement, alongside broader programming language compatibility.
Security consultant at Entelgy Innotec Security4.0I use Kiuwan for code assessment and issue resolution, appreciating its modularity and efficient rule creation. However, integration with development frameworks could be improved. Despite time-consuming updates, Kiuwan is essential, preventing costly errors and offering valuable insights.
Information Security Manager at ITC SOLUCIONES TECNOLOGICAS S.A.S4.5I use Kiuwan for vulnerability testing, valuing its local scanning for security and early issue detection. I'd like better support (chat/phone) and usage-based pricing. Despite minor maintenance, I recommend this excellent, easy-to-setup platform.
Information Security Officer at Umniah4.0I value Kiuwan's stability, scalability, and good remediation. However, initial setup and support were problematic, its configuration assessment is weak, and free tools offer comparable quality, making its cost a concern.
Cyber Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I develop use cases to improve code quality and address vulnerabilities. Kiuwan offers valuable options for enhancing code quality and security, although limited library alternatives require extensive modifications. It is more user-friendly than Checkmarx, Veracode, and Fortify.
Information Security Specialist at a tech company with 51-200 employees4.0I use Kiuwan for FinTech code analysis, valuing its detailed reports on risk and vulnerability. However, integration needs improvement, and report effectiveness is questionable, as it missed key issues. I rate it an eight.