Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Imprivata OneSign comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and Imprivata are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Fortinet is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.1, while Imprivata is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. Fortinet holds a 3.7% mindshare in SSO, compared to Imprivata’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Imprivata users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Imprivata OneSign and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are leading authentication management solutions. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator stands out for its comprehensive security features, gaining user preference despite its higher cost.

Features: Imprivata OneSign is valued for single sign-on capabilities, streamlined user access, and user-friendliness. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is praised for robust multi-factor authentication, extensive integration options, and advanced security measures.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Imprivata OneSign could improve reporting features, customization options, and usability. For Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, feedback highlights the need for a more intuitive setup process, easier deployment, and a simplified user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imprivata OneSign is noted for its quick deployment and responsive customer service. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is perceived as more complex during deployment but offers robust support once implemented.

Pricing and ROI: Imprivata OneSign is seen as cost-effective with a quick ROI due to lower initial setup costs. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, while more expensive to implement, is considered worth the investment for its comprehensive feature set and long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Imprivata OneSign Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Imprivata OneSign

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Duo

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Cisco Duo is 3.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is 3.7%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imprivata OneSign is 2.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Duo	3.2%
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator	3.7%
Imprivata OneSign	2.5%
Other	90.6%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Charles Slaustas

Information Technology Contractor at Insight global

Supports seamless authentication for users across multiple organizations and personal portals

The features I use in Cisco Duo include Duo Pushes to confirm my identity to the device, and eventually as MFA security was increased, I actually had to use exchange passcodes. Sometimes, I have to go into the site and get into Cisco Duo to retrieve the passcode, and many of them have been two-factor, where the sites send a passcode that I have to enter into Cisco Duo. It has been more of the latter. I have not seen issues with lagging or crashing on Cisco Duo's end; it was usually on the client end, often because someone set up a bad upgrade or there were connection issues with the Cisco Duo cloud through the administrative site.

Read full review

reviewer2848395

Technical Business Development Manager at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Multi-factor security has improved device protection but still needs broader application coverage

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator could be improved in its cost structure. Although it is not expensive, other solutions offer more value for less money. Cisco Duo provides better value in this regard and connects to web applications much more easily, scaling effectively in that sense. While I have never used Cisco Duo to secure other devices in IoT environments, I know Cisco Duo is capable of doing so, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator cannot. Additionally, Cisco Duo is also cheaper. These are the main reasons why we switched away from Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, as it was very limited compared to other solutions available. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator was primarily missing the ability to scale to web applications.

Read full review

Rohit Yamsani

Senior Consultant at HCLSoftware

Single sign-on saves time by seamlessly managing passwords and improving workflow efficiency

What I appreciate best about Imprivata OneSign are the single sign-on and the Confirm ID features. The single sign-on works seamlessly for all the nurses or the end users out there. You just have to log in to the application once and the single sign-on clicks in and works for everyone. Users don't have to manually remember all their passwords. Imprivata OneSign helps by remembering and storing all passwords. The integration capabilities of Imprivata OneSign offer many possibilities, and there are numerous upgrades Imprivata has been implementing. At this point, they are growing rapidly. There are new tools coming out for reporting and generating real-time analysis. Imprivata E-PAM is a new feature that I've been reading about in articles, which is going to help administrator people and enterprise administrator personnel to view real-time records and views for all end customers. Reporting and looking at logs for the users will be seamlessly efficient. I use the reporting tools available in Imprivata OneSign. The admin console itself has a reporting feature, which gives us a list of pre-built templates of reports where you can see how many users have been added, the user policy, the users who have last logged in in specific amounts of days, and the reporting for the EPCS users. There are numerous reporting options available which help with troubleshooting issues. I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses. As a nurse or doctor, you don't have to spend time remembering passwords or signing into computers. You just need to grab the nearest machine and tap in. You can use the machine anytime if you want. It saves time when dealing with patients. For doctors who might not be tech-savvy, Imprivata OneSign helps them sign in seamlessly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature of Cisco Duo that I value the most is that it's easy to use; it monitors all our devices to ensure everything is updated before we're given access to those applications."

"The benefit of the features of Cisco Duo is that it secures our environment; nobody can access or join the network without it, and Cisco Duo will recognize and ensure that only people who are allowed in our environment can access our devices."

"I can say that it is difficult to measure the direct return on investment, but what I can say is that we are safer and feel more comfortable having this security implemented than before."

"Duo allowed us to greatly enhance our security."

"Regarding the stability and reliability of Cisco Duo, it is very good."

"The deployment and installation process for Cisco Duo is quite straightforward, which is an advantage."

"The biggest overall impact of Cisco Duo on our company has been the peace of mind it provides, helping us sleep a little more soundly at night knowing that we have that layer there, and operationally, it has fostered more trust when it comes to logging into systems."

"Since we onboarded it, since we started using Cisco Duo, we have never had any operational glitch."

More Cisco Duo pros

"We are using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator to implement token-based authentication for wireless network access."

"The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is easy."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the security; it's great."

"Using this product strengthens enterprise security."

"It keeps track of users and their IPs no matter where they are in the network. When users roam, we don't have to worry about not mapping them to an IP."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is the fact that you can utilize your tokens across the whole Fortinet fabric once you have the FortiAuthenticator."

"Once you configure it properly, it runs fine."

"The solution is an integral part of our security for our email network, and like I said, we'll begin using it for other cloud applications."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator pros

"Imprivata supports single sign-on, providing a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using, and the deployment is very quick and not difficult to deploy."

"Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security."

"I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses."

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."

Cons

"I think Cisco Duo could be improved by including email authentication, as there is currently only SMS, SMS push, and code generation, but having email authentication could be beneficial when you don't have a phone."

"I think Cisco Duo can be improved. I found the onboarding was very difficult, even for engineers who have been using similar solutions before."

"I would appreciate seeing Cisco Duo improved with a tighter integration with Active Directory to secure not just Remote Desktop to a server, but all the remote levels of connection that you can make to a server."

"If I could improve Cisco Duo, I would suggest providing some notification back that the Cisco Duo system was not able to reach the remote device, because I was left in a situation where I did not know if it was actually my cell phone or something was wrong with Cisco Duo."

"Cisco Duo is generally easy to use, but there are a few areas where it could be improved."

"Cisco Duo can be improved because people have their own personal mobile devices."

"I think Cisco Duo could improve the dashboard to make logging in and credential management more visible."

"I have not seen ROI with Cisco Duo; probably the opposite, because it impedes productivity time to be able to get into the system. You have to authenticate and do your regular login and your Active Directory logins."

More Cisco Duo cons

"Initially, we deployed Fortinet FortiAuthenticator on VMware and faced challenges when migrating to an OpenStack environment, which required reconfiguration. I recommend Fortinet make its images migratable between environments."

"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."

"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The one thing they used to include was the SMS gateway from the ISP; Fortinet used to sell that but they don't anymore and I think it would be helpful for end-users if they brought it back."

"There have been numerous support tickets sent to Fortinet since this does not appear to be a mature product."

"The integration with other products, for example, some SAML authentications, would make it more flexible."

"I would like to see more integration and inclusion of features for ransomware protection directly within the FortiAuthenticator without requiring additional devices."

"The solution's command line interface could be improved to provide better support for low-level debugging and advanced configurations."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator cons

"Imprivata OneSign should have a landing page because most customers prefer this feature, which is currently a strong point for competitors."

"Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefront connectivity."

"They should have a landing page."

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was very reasonable."

"Cisco's licensing is always a bit complicated to understand, but the price is fair. It could be more expensive than others, but the way they integrate everything, it has a fair price."

"Their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing costs."

"Price wise, it's not cheap, but it's not expensive at all either. It's in the middle."

"It's very simple. Its price is fair. We use the hardware tokens as well. You get what you pay for. In terms of licensing, Cisco has very complicated products, but Duo Security was surprisingly easy."

"You pay per user when using this solution and the pricing is fair."

"My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Cisco Duo has been great. We've been there for 10 years. While we haven't gone through the setup part for a while, licensing is straightforward and convenient for higher education because student populations are included. So, we don't have to pay extra for it. We just pay for our knowledge workers, which has been great, and the cost is reasonable."

"Cisco has the most expensive products because market leaders tend to charge a lot."

More Cisco Duo pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the license could be less expensive. The license is paid on a yearly basis."

"The licensing structure is cost-effective for us compared to some of the other solutions that have recurring monthly costs."

"FAC is an affordable solution for Middle Range (200E/400E) and also needs a package of mobility agents (2,000) perpetual."

"I rate the product price as two or three on a one-to-ten scale, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"You can pay as you go with them. You purchase a base license and add to it as needed."

"The customers need to pay for licenses, and some pay on a yearly basis while others pay on a three-yearly or five-yearly basis. Also, it is not an expensive solution."

"It's not expensive."

"I price of the solution is expensive."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator pricing and cost advice

"The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."

"At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

22%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	82

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Du...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Duo Security?

Regarding the pricing, what actually happened was that we got the product purchased through our HQ, so the costing as...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Duo Security?

I do not have a straight answer for how Cisco Duo can be improved at this time. With the implementation that we are g...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

My experience with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's pricing found the pricing to be good. There are better solutions ava...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator could be improved in its cost structure. Although it is not expensive, other solutions of...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator was implemented as a multi-factor authentication solution to serve as a second barrier fo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Imprivata OneSign?

Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for V...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Imprivata OneSign?

I have experience with Imprivata OneSign and Imprivata Confirm ID. For the past three and a half years, I've been usi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Imprivata OneSign?

As an end user, it's easy to use Imprivata OneSign. Users don't have to rely much on knowledge to use that tool. It's...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Cisco Duo

Compared 7% of the time

Okta Platform vs Cisco Duo

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Cisco Duo

Compared 3% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Cisco Duo

Compared 3% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Cisco Duo

Compared 2% of the time

More Cisco Duo Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiToken vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 3% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Competitors

Okta Platform vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 12% of the time

BlueFletch vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Evidian Enterprise SSO vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 3% of the time

More Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Duo

November 2026

Download Cisco Duo product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

November 2026

Download Fortinet FortiAuthenticator product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

November 2026

Download Imprivata OneSign product report

Also Known As

Duo Security

FortiAuthenticator

OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management

Overview

Cisco Duo is a cloud-based identity security platform safeguarding critical resources for any user and device worldwide. Known for its ease of use, Duo offers seamless protection across multi-cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments.

Cisco Duo is designed to secure access with identity-first protection and provides extensive visibility throughout an organization's identity ecosystem. Offering multi-factor authentication, Duo facilitates easy integration and management, allowing teams to protect data effectively on VPNs, applications, and networks. Its single-pane management improves security processes while enhancing trust, making it suitable for diverse IT infrastructures.

What are the key features of Cisco Duo?

Multi-factor Authentication: Strengthens user verification with multiple methods.
Push Notifications: Simplifies authentication with quick approvals.
Single Sign-On: Enhances convenience by allowing one set of credentials.
VPN Access: Secures remote connections with reliable authentication.
User Activity Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights into access patterns.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Quick Deployment: Facilitates rapid integration within existing systems.
Effective Management: Streamlines IT operations with centralized control.
Regulatory Compliance: Aids in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Enhanced Trust: Strengthens security posture across networks.
User-friendly Approach: Simplifies authentication for non-technical users.

In industries like education and finance, Cisco Duo is widely employed to secure multi-factor authentication across platforms such as email, databases, and servers. Its integration capabilities with Microsoft 365, Active Directory, and VPNs like AnyConnect are instrumental in verifying user identities using mobile apps or OTPs, catering effectively to both remote and on-premise environments.

Cisco

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator enhances security through intuitive management and integration capabilities, offering two-factor authentication and seamless connectivity with FortiGate, LDAP, and AD. It provides robust OTP features and operates efficiently across diverse environments.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is designed to streamline two-factor and multi-factor authentication processes across diverse network environments. Its seamless integration with Active Directory optimizes secure user management and enhances VPN security. It facilitates multi-domain authentication and serves as a comprehensive identity and access management tool. Organizations leverage its capabilities for VPN and network access while utilizing tokens for increased security. Its single sign-on feature aids in simplifying identity management and authorization, supporting extensive network and application security demands. However, improvements could be made to its outdated interface, pricing strategy, and better integration with third-party applications. Streamlined command line configurations and bolstered technical support would enhance user experience further.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Simple FSSO configuration: Provides easy setup for secure single sign-on.
Flexible two-factor authentication: Offers varied authentication methods to enhance security.
Seamless integration: Works effortlessly with LDAP, AD, and FortiGate systems.
Intuitive management: Features a user-friendly interface for efficient management.
Robust OTP features: Supports diverse credentials for One-Time Passwords.

What benefits should users expect from Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Enhanced security: Through detailed logs and strong authentication measures.
Cost-effective management: Reduces administrative overhead and operational costs.
Global operation support: Provides reliable service worldwide.
Centralized management: Increases efficiency across devices and platforms.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and education, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is implemented to secure sensitive data and streamline access management. Its integration capabilities support compliance requirements, while its authentication features ensure authorized access across platforms, enhancing both security and operational efficiency.

Fortinet

Imprivata OneSign provides single sign-on, streamlining application access through AI-managed passwords. It supports legacy systems, enhances security, and saves time, especially valuable for healthcare. Confirm ID and reporting tools enable seamless integration and user activity tracking.

Imprivata OneSign is a comprehensive single sign-on and multi-factor authentication platform that simplifies password management and streamlines user access to over fifty applications. Designed primarily for healthcare, it integrates with both cloud and on-premises systems, offering upgraded versions like G4 23.7 with advanced security features such as MFA and Vasco tokens. Although its price point is higher and Mac OS compatibility is limited, it improves focus on patient care by reducing administrative burdens. Challenges include fast user switching, Citrix integration lag, and authentication slowness with published applications.

What are Imprivata OneSign's key features?

Single Sign-On: Access multiple applications with one ID, enhancing security and efficiency.
AI-Managed Passwords: Automates password entry, reducing manual input and errors.
Legacy System Integration: Enhances security and eases transitions with existing systems.
Confirm ID: Ensures seamless and secure end-user authentication.
E-PAM & Reporting Tools: Tracks user activity to optimize system use.

What benefits should users look for in OneSign reviews?

Enhanced Security: Combines single sign-on with MFA and Vasco tokens for improved data protection.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on administrative tasks, focusing resource allocation on patient care.
Scalability: Supports cloud and on-premises deployments, accommodating growing IT infrastructures.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT systems while offering advanced security features.

Imprivata OneSign is especially impactful in healthcare settings, where quick access to applications without sacrificing security is crucial. It facilitates e-prescribing and other clinical tasks through streamlined processes and advanced authentication measures, ensuring that patient care remains the primary focus.

Imprivata

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Imprivata OneSign

November 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Imprivata OneSign

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Imprivata OneSign and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Imprivata OneSign report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.